Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Archiving metadata forum: Report from the Recordkeeping Metadata Working Meeting, June 2000

  • Reports
  • Published:
Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  1. “Information which facilitates the management, accessibility and meaning of records through time by identifying, authenticating and contextualising records and the people, processes and systems that create and keep them.” See: http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/publicsector/erk/metadata/metadata-std/Body1.htm. Accessed March 15, 2001.

  2. International Organization for Standardization,Records Management (ISO/TC 46/SC 11). Draft dated November 10, 1999.

  3. Sue McKemmish, Glenda Acland, Nigel Ward and Barbara Reed, “Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: the Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema,” Archivaria 48 (Fall 1999): 3–43. See: http://www.sims.monash.edu.au/rcrg/publications/archiv01.htm. Accessed March 15, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. .

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taxonomies and classifications such as the “Nursing Intervention System”, which provides a classification system of 336 interventions further sub-divided into 6 domains and 26 classes, each comprised of a label, a definition, a set of activities, and background readings. See: Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star,Sorting Things, Out: Classification and its Consequences (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See: http://www.indecs.org/. Accessed March 15, 2001. See also: Godfrey Rust, “Metadata: The Right Approach — An Integrated Model for Descriptive and Rights Metadata in E-commerce”,D-Lib Magazine (July/August 1998). <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july98/rust/07rust.html>. Accessed March 15, 2001.

  7. See: http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/harmony/.Accessed March 15, 2001.

  8. See: http://dublincore.org/.Accessed March 15, 2001.

  9. U.S. National Historical Publications and Records Commission,Research Issues in Electronic Records (St. Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Historical Society, 1991). http://www. nara.gov/nhprc/erreport.html#research url. Accessed March 15, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See: http://www.sdsc.edu/NARA/. Accessed March 15, 2001.

  11. This has been done. See: http://www.archiefschool.nl/amf/. Accessed March 15, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information, University of Michigan, 304 West Hall 1092, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    David A. Wallace

Authors
  1. David A. Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The following narrative has been written to capture the flavor and nature of the Working Meeting's discussions. Attributions are generally not made to individual participants, except for individual session “resource persons” responsible for initiating and framing particular discussions, or when a graphic/illustration was offered for consideration. The author takes sole responsibility for any mis-renderings of the Working Meeting discussions. A more detailed account of this Working Meeting's proceedings is available at: www.archiefschool.nl/amf/.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, D.A. Archiving metadata forum: Report from the Recordkeeping Metadata Working Meeting, June 2000. Archival Science 1, 253–269 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437690

Keywords

Search

Navigation