Abstract
There are currently several debates taking place in palaeoanthropological circles in which the issue of sexual dimorphism is crucial. During the 60th Jubilee of the discovery of the TaungAustralopithecus skull, the authors concurred that much of the debate was due to differences in perception concerning dimorphism, and it was suggested that a study session dealing principally with sexual dimorphism in Primates should be organised with a view to determining what, if anything, could be observed in extant primates that might be utilised for determining the existence of dimorphism in fossil species. An advertisement was placed in the Journal of Human Evolution, calling for papers. Response was encouraging, suggesting that there was indeed a need for such a meeting, which was organised to take place late in November in Italy. Seventeen scientists sent abstracts, but due to the rather short notice, several were unable to attend the meeting. Nevertheless, papers were received and read at the meeting which form the basis for this issue of the Journal of Human Evolution. What remains to be done now, is for a second meeting to be organised at which the findings of the first meeting can be extended backwards in time into the fossil record.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous, 1980. —Recommendations for age and sex diagnosis of skeleton. Journal of Human Evolution, 9: 517–549.
De Bonis L. andMelentis J., 1984. —La position phylétique d’Ouranopithecus. In: P. Andrews and J. Franzen (eds.)The early evolution of man. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg, Frankfurt, 69: 13–23.
Delson E., 1985. —The earlist Sivapithecus? Nature, 318: 107–108.
Frisch J., 1973. —Sexual dimorphism in canines of Hylobates lar. Primates, 4: 1–10.
Gaulin S. andSailer L., 1984. —Sexual dimorphism in weight among the Primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. International Journal Primatology, 5: 515–535.
Gingerich P., 1981. —Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. I. Sexual dimorphism in Adapis magnus and Adapis parisiensis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 56: 117–124.
Greenfield L., 1972. —Sexual dimorphism in Dryopithecus africanus. Primates, 13: 395–410.
Harvey P. andClutton-Brock T., 1985. —Life history variation in Primates. Evolution, 39: 559–581.
Leutenegger W. andCheverud J., 1985. —Sexual dimorphism in Primates: The effects of size. In Jungers W., (ed.). Size and scaling in Primate Biology. Plenum Press, New York 1985: 35–50.
Napier J. andNapier P., 1985. —The Natural History of the Primates. London, Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1–200.
Oxnard C., 1983. —Sexual dimorphisms in the overall proportions of Primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 4: 1–22.
Pickford M., 1985. —A new look at Kenyapithecus based on recent discoveries in Western Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 14: 113–143.
Pickford M., (in prep.) —Sexual Dimorphism in Proconsul.
Senut B., 1980. —New data on the humerus and its joints in Plio-Pleistocene hominids. Collegium Anthropologicum, 4: 87–93.
Simons E. L., 1981. —Man’s immediate forerunners. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 292: 21–41.
White T. D., Johanson D. andKimbel W., 1981. —Australopithecus afarensis. Its phyletic position reconsidered. South African Journal of Science, 77: 445–470.
Wu R. andOxnard C., 1983. —Ramapithecines from China: evidence from dimensions of teeth. Nature, 306: 258–260.
Zihlman A., 1984. —Body build and tissue composition in Pan panicus and Pan troglodytes, with comparisons to other hominoids. In: Sussman R., (ed.).The Pygmy Chimpanzee, pp. 179–200. Plenum, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pickford, M., Chiarelli, A.B. Sexual dimorphism in primates: Where are we and where do we go from here?. Hum. Evol. 1, 1–5 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437281
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437281