Skip to main content
Log in

The adoption of bipedalism by the hominids: A new hypothesis

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

The hypothesis is advanced that the habitual adoption of the bipedal stance and of bipedal locomotion in the hominids arose from the development of a defence mechanism, namely, the throwing of stones. It is argued that for stone-throwing to become an effective weapon, modifications to the whole post-cranial skeleton and musculature, as well as to the central nervous system are required; including the development of a low centre of gravity and a «launching platform» of relatively high mass. It is represented that hominids, from the earliest Australopithecines to modern man, exhibit modifications to the post-cranial structures that are more consonant with this hypothesis than with the interpretation that the modifications were directed initially and principally towards bipedalism. Such an interpretation is shown to create several anomalies which disappear when viewed in the context of the stated hypothesis.

The importance of the hypothesis for the evolution of Homo and especially for his brain and higher thought processes is commented upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer H. R., 1977.Chimpanzee bipedal locomotion in the Gombe National Park, East Africa. Primates, 18(4): 913–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielicki T., 1984.Evolution of the intensity of feedbacks between physical and cultural evolution from man's emergence to present times. UNESCO Expert meeting on the Biological Aspects of Race, Moscow, 12–18 August 1964 (manuscript quoted by Tobias, P. V., 1982.q.v.).

  • Butynski T. M., 1982.Vertebrate predations by Primates: A review of Hunting Patterns and Prey. Journal of Human Evolution, 11: 421–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin W. H., 1982.Did throwing stones shape hominid brain evolution? Ethology and Sociobiology, 3: 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier D. R., 1984.The energetic paradox of human running and hominid evolution. Current Anthropology 25(4): 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dart R. A., 1950.Voluntary muscle in the human body. The double spiral arrangement. British Journal of Physical Medicine, 13: 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C., 1871.Descent of Man (2nd Edition, 1913, London, John Murray).

    Google Scholar 

  • Day M. H. &Napier J. R., 1964.Hominid fossils from Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanganyika. Fossil foot bones. Nature, 201: 967–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day M. H., 1986.Bipedalism: pressures, origins and modes. In: Major topics in primate and human evolution (ed. Wood, B., Lawrence, M., Andrews, P.), Cambridge University Press, 188–202.

  • Duchenne G. B. A., 1867.Physiologie des Mouvements (cited by Robinson, J. T., 1972q.v.).

  • Fleagle J. C., Stern Jr J. T., Jungers W. L., Susman R. L., Vangor A. K. &Wells, J. P., 1981.Climbing: A Biomechanical Link with Brachiation and with Bipedalism. Symposium of the Zoological Society, London, 48: 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J. van Lawick, 1964.Tool using and aimed throwing in a community of free-living chimpanzees. Nature, No. 4926: 1264–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goslin B. R. &Charteris J., 1982.The human elbow and knee: Functional relationships and phylogenetic considerations. Human Biology, 54: 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurov J. R., 1982.Surface electromyography of superficial back muscles in human children. Functions during vertical climbing and suspension and implications for the evolution of hominid bipedalism. Journal of Human Evolution, 11: 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortlandt A., 1980.How might early hominids have defended themselves against large predators and food competitors? Journal of Human Evolution, 9: 2, 79–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy C. D., Kingsbury G., Heiple, K. G. &Burstein A. H., 1973.The gait of Australopithecus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 38: 757–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy C. O., 1981.The Origin of Man. Science, 211: 4480, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times, September 9th 1974 (cited in The Complete Book of Baseball, ed. Brown, G., 1980, New York, Arno Press).

  • Poirier F. E., 1977.Fossil evidence — the Human, Evolutionary Journey. Saint Louis, C. V. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prost J. H., 1980.Origin of bipedalism. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 52: 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J. T., 1972.Early hominid posture and locomotion. Chicago/London, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J. T., Freedman L. Y., Sigmon B. A., 1972.Some aspects of human bipedality. Journal of Human Evolution, 1: 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M. D., 1984.A hominine hip bone, KMN-ER 3228, from East Turkana, Kenya. American Journal Physical Anthropology, 63: 371–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern Jr. J. &Susman R., 1983. The locomotor anatomy ofAustralopithecus afarensis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 60(3): 279–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias P. V., 1982.Man the tottering biped. New South Wales Committee in Postgraduate Medical Education, University of New South Wales.

  • Washburn S. L. &Howell F. C. 1960. Human evolution and culture. In: Evolution after Darwin (editor Tax, E.), 2, Chicago, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J. S., 1973.Charles Darwin's Descent of Man—after 100 years. In: Human Evolution (ed. Day, M. H.), Symposium of the Society for the Study of Human Biology, 11: 1–12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fifer, F.C. The adoption of bipedalism by the hominids: A new hypothesis. Hum. Evol. 2, 135–147 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436402

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436402

Key words

Navigation