Skip to main content
Log in

Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of prehistoric weaponry remains an open question in North American archaeology. The traditional model argues for an early use of the throwing spear followed by the spearthrower and bow and arrow. A major difficulty in testing this model is, identifying the functional variables that characterize different weaponry. The evolution of prehistoric weaponry is reexamined here from an evolutionary perspective where projectile points are considered part of the complete weapon system and variation within that system is identified. The engineering of four weapon systems, the thrusting spear, throwing spear, spearthrower, and bow, are examined to identify those point variables that enhance the success of the system. These variables are then measured on a 9000-year sequence of projectile points from northwestern Wyoming to examine time/space patterns. The patterns reveal that the spearthrower was in use prior to 7500 years ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abler, W. L. (1992) The serrated teeth of Tyrannosaurid dinosaurs and biting structure in other animals.Paleobiology 18: 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertson, M. L., Barton, J. R., and Simons, D. B. (1960).Fluid Mechanics for Engineers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, L. (1987)Economy, Society and Warfare Among the Britons and Saxons, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, G. W. (1975)An Introduction to the Ecology of Early Historic Communal Bison Hunting Among the Northern Plains Indians, Archaeological Survey of Canada Paper No. 37, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, C. A., and Newcomer, M. H. (1983). Flint arrowhead breakage: Examples from Ksar Akil, Lebanon.Journal of Field Archaeology 10: 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, C. A., McEwen E., and Miller, R. (1983). Experimental archery: Projectile velocities and comparison of bow performances.Antiquity 62: 658–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, R., Janzon, B., Rybeck, B., and Seeman, T. (1979). Retardation of spherical missiles in live tissue.Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, Supplementum 489, Proceedings of the Symposium on Wound Ballistics, Stockholm, pp. 91–100.

  • Beyer, J. C. (ed.) (1962)Wound Ballistics, Medical Department, U.S. Army, United States Army Medical Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, J. H. (1988). Adoption of the bow in prehistoric North America.North American Archaeologist 9: 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, A. P. (1997). The bow and arrow in the Eastern Woodlands: Evidence for an Archaic origin.North American Archaeologist 18(3): 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. (1974) Comments on the lithic technology of the Casper Site materials. In Frison, G. C. (ed.)The Casper Site: a Hell Gap Bison Kill on the High Plains, Academic Press, New York, pp. 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J. (1940) Projectile points.American Antiquity 5: 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. H. (1954)Archery Handbook, Arco, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. F. (1973).The New Archery, A. S. Barnes, Cranbury, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, W. G. (1975). The atlatl: The physics of function and performance.,Plains Anthropologis 20: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cady, W. M. (1949). Remarks on the weighted atlatl.Masterkey 23: 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. (1990).The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition: A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts, Reprinted by the Eastern States Archaeological Federation.

  • Catlin, G. (1941).Letters and Notes on the Manner Customs, and Condition of the North American Indians I, Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, A. L. (1986). Projectile point size and projectile aerodynamics: An exploratory study.Plains Anthropologist 31: 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. M., and Glassow, R. B. (1968).Kinesiology 2nd ed., C. V. Mosby, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, D. W. (1972).Neck Width of Projectile Points: An Index of Cultural Continuity and Change, Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum, No. 29.

  • Cosgrove, C. B. (1947)Caves of the Upper Gila and Hueca Areas in New Mexico and Texas, Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 24, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterell, B., and Kamminga, J. (1992).Mechanics of Pre-Industrial Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundy, B. J. (1989).Formal Variation in Australian Spear and Spearthrower Technology. BAR International Series 546, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy.American Antiquity 43(2): 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1980). Evolutionary theory and archaeology. InAdvances in Archeological Method and Theory 3: 35–99.

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1989). Aspects of the application of evolutionary theory in archaeology. In Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (ed.),Archaeological Thought, in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1995). What is it that actually evolves? In Teltser, P. A. (ed.),Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. J. (1994). Factors influencing the use of stone projectile tips: An ethnographic perspective. Paper presented at the Society for American Archaeology Meetings, Anaheim, CA.

  • English, F. L. (1930). The exterior ballistics of the arrow.Journal of the Franklin Institute 210: 805–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, O. F. (1957). Probable use of stone projectile, points.American Antiquity 23: 83–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, W. B., Jr., and Kornfeld, M. (1980). Projectile point neck-width variability and chronology on the Plains.Wyoming Contributions to Anthropology 2: 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feathers, J. (1990).Explaining the Evolution of Prehistoric Ceramics in Southeastern Missouri, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenenga, F. (1953). The weights of chipped stone points: A clue to their functions.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 9: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenenga, F., and Wheat, J. B. (1940), An atlatl from the Baylor Rock Shelter, Culberson County, Texas,American Antiquity 5(3): 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. (1985). Hunting with flint-tipped arrows: Results and experiences from practical experiments. InBonsall, C. (ed.),The Mesolithic in Europe, John Donald Publishers, Edinburgh, England, pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flenniken, J. J., and Raymond, A. W. (1986). Morphological projectile point typology: Replication experimentation and technological analysis.American Antiquity 51(3): 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flenniken, J. J., and Wilke, P. J. (1989). Typology, technology, and chronology of Great Basin dart points.American Anthropologist 91: 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. E. (1983)Procurement and Utilization of Chipped Stone Raw Materials: A Case Study from the Bighom Mountains and Basin of North-Central Wyoming, Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazzetta, T. H. (1988). The mechanics of cutting and the form of shark teeth (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii).Zoomorphology 108: 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friis-Hansen, J. (1990). Mesolithic cutting arrows: Functional analysis of arrows used in the hunting of large game.Antiquity 64: 494–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (ed.) (1974).The Casper Site, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (1978).Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (1989). Experimental use of Clovis weaponry and tools on African elephants.American Antiquity 54: 766–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (1993). North American High Plains paleo-indian hunting strategies and weaponry assemblages. In Soffer, O., and Praslov, N. D. (eds.),From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic Rateo Indian Adaptations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A. (1970). Spears and spear-throwers of the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia.American Museum Novitates 2403: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guernsey, S. J. (1931). Explorations in northeastern Arizona, report on the archaeological fieldwork of 1920–1923.Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology No. 12, Cambridge, MA, pp. 71–72, 99, 107.

  • Guernsey, S. J., and Kidder, A. V. (1921). Basket-maker caves of Northeastern Arizona.Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology No. 8, Cambridge, MA, pp. 80–87.

  • Guthrie, R. D. (1983). Osseous projectile points: Biological considerations affecting raw material selection and design among Paleolithic and paleoindian peoples. In Clutton-Brock, J., and Grigson, C. (eds.),Animals and Archaeology: I. Hunters and Their Prey, BAR International Series 163, pp. 273–294.

  • Hames, R. B. (1979). A comparison of the efficiencies of the shotgun and the bow in neotropical forest hunting,Human Ecology 7: 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, T. M. (1982).Native American Bows, Missouri Archaeological Society, Special Publications No. 5, Columbia, MO.

  • Hanam, J. (1991).Bows and Arrows of the Native Americans, Lyons and Burford, Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, T. J., Col. (1938).Exterior Ballistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, C. N. (1929). Velocity and acceleration of arrows. Weight and efficiency of bows as affected by backing of bow.Journal of the Franklin Institute 208: 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, C. N., Nagler, F., and Klopsteg, P. E. (1947).Archery: The Technical Side, National Field Archery Association.

  • Higgins, G. J. (1933). The aerodynamics of an arrow.Journal of the Franklin Institute 216: 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. W. (1948). The atlatl or throwing stick. A recent study of atlatls in use with darts of various sizes.Tennessee Archaeologist 4: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, R. K., and Bleed, P. (1994). Each according to need and fashion: Spear and arrow use among !Kung hunters of the Kalahari. Paper presented at the 59th annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, Anaheim, CA

  • Howard, C. D. (1974). The Atlatl: Function and performance.American Antiquity 39: 102–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, M. (1984). Optimal javelin trajectories.Journal of Biomechanics 17: 777–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, M. (1989). The throwing events in track and field. In Vaughn, C. L. (ed.),Biomechanics of Sport, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 214–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, M., and Rust, H. J. (1984). Simulation of javelin flight using experimental aerodynamic data.Journal of Biomechanics 17: 769–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. S. (1981).Projectile Point Variability: A Study of Point Curation at a Besant Kill Site in Southcentral Wyoming, M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming, Laramie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. S. (1988). Mummy Cave revisited.Annals of Wyoming 60: 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, W., and Edgar, R. (n.d.).The Archaeology of Mummy Cave, Wyoming. Manuscript on file at the Buffalo Bill Historical Center, Cody, WY.

  • Jauhari, M., and Bandyopadhyay A. (1976) Wound ballistics: An analysis of a bullet in gel.Journal of Forensic Sciences 21: 616–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. T., Leonard, R. D., and Abbot, A. L. (1995). The structure of selectionist explanations in archaeology. In Teltser, P. A. (ed.),Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselyn, D. W. (1961). Paleo-ballistics.Tennessee Archaeologist 17: 51–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. J. (1973).Paleoindian occupation of the central Rio Grande Valley in New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellar, J. H. (1955).The Atlatl in North America, Indian Historical Society No. 3, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Klopsteg, P. E. (1939). The penetration of arrows.American Bowman Review, July, Albany, OR.

  • Klopsteg, P. E. (1943). Physics of bows and arrows.American Journal of Physics 11: 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, B. (1975). The dynamics of stab wounds.Forensic Science 6: 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, R. D. (1984).How to Make and Use the Atlatl, Atlatl Press, Saratoga, WY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. W. (1929).Modern Archery, A. S. Barnes, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenau, E. E., Jr. (1986). Factors associated with hunter retrieval of deer hit by Arrows and shotgun slugs.Leisure Sciences 8: 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larralde, S. L. (1990).The Design of Hunting Weapons: Archaeological Evidence from Southwestern Wyoming, Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. (1982).Indians of the Plains, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luedtke, B. E. (1992).An Archaeologist's Guide to Chert and Flint, Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoo, B. N., and Wani, A. K. (1969). Casualty criteria for wounds from firearms with special reference to shot penetration.Journal of Forensic Sciences 14: 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoo, B. N., and Wani, A. K. (1979). An analysis of gunshot-wound production.Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, Supplementum 489, Proceedings of the Symposium on Wound Ballistics, Stockholm, pp. 27–34.

  • Mattoo, B. N., Wani, A. K., and Asgekar, M. D., (1974). Casualty criteria for wounds from firearms with special reference to shot penetration-Part II.Journal of Forensic Sciences 19: 585–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, C. (1963). Experiments with the spear thrower.New York State Archaeological Association Bulletin, No. 29, pp. 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, H. (ed.) (1978).The Mummy Cave Project in Northwestern Wyoming, Buffalo Bill Historical Center, Cody, WY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, D. J. (1995). Clocking the first Americans.Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. I., and Munro, C. F. (1983). Javelin position and velocity patterns during final foot plant preceding release.Journal of Human Movement Studies 8: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, F. R. (1962).Methods in Exterior Ballistics, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassaney, M. S. and Pyle, K. (n.d.).The adoption of the bow and arrow in eastern North America: a view from central Arkansas. Manuscript on file Department of Anthropology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

  • O'Brien, M. J. (1996). The historical development of an evolutionary archaeology: A selectionist approach. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.),Darwinian Archaeologies, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, M. J., and Holland, T. D. (1992). The role of adaptation in archaeological explanation.American Antiquity 57: 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, J. F., and Hawkes, K. (1988). Hadza hunting, butchering, and bone transport and their archaeological implications.Journal of Anthropological Research 44: 113–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H. (1988). Addressing prehistoric hunting practices through stone tool analysis.American Anthropologist 90: 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H., and Cowan, F. (1986). Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets.Journal of Field Archaeology 13: 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palter, J. L. (1977). Design and construction of Australian spear-thrower projectiles and hand-thrown spears.Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 12: 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, L. W. (1985). Distinguishing between arrow and spear points on the upper Texas coast.Lithic Technology 14(2): 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, L. W. (1993). Current data on early use of the bow and arrow in southern North America.Ohio Archaeology 43: 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peets, O. H. (1960). Experiments in the use of atlatl weights.American Antiquity 26: 108–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, W. R. (1992). The weighted atlatl and dart: A deceptively complicated mechanical system.Archaeology in Montana 33: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. T. (1962).Bows and Arrows, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, J. (1994). Gradual or step-wise change: The development of sedentary settlement patterns in Northeast MississippiAmerican Antiquity 59: 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratto, N. (1993). What and how did they hunt? Methodological essay to approach the question of prehistoric hunting techniques.Arqueologia Contemporaned 4: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausing, G. (1967).The Bow: Some Notes on its Origin and Development, Acta Archaeological Lundensia No. 8, CWK Gleerups Förlag, Lund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, A. (1986). Experiments in the function and performance of the weighted atlatl.World Archaeology 18: 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichart, N., and Keasey, G. (1940).Archery, A. S. Barnes, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roller, D., and Blum, R. (1981).Mechanics, Waves, and Thermodynamics, Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., and Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability.American Antiquity 62(1): 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, M. S. (1996). Elko or San Pedro? A quantitative analysis of Late Archaic projectile points from White Tanks, Yuma Counfy Arizona.Kiva 61(4): 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shames, I. H. (1962).Mechanics of Fluids, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1993). Spears, darts, and arrows: Late Woodland hunting techniques in the Upper Ohio Valley.American Antiquity 58: 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1996). Innovation and selection in prehistory: A case study from the American Bottom. In Odell, G. (ed.),Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, Plenum, New York, pp. 279–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1997). Stones and shafts redux: The metric discrimination of chipped-stone dart and arrow points.American Antiquity 62: 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, A. (1964).Early Greek Armour and Weapons, University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1984).The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollberger, J. B. (1977). Fracture theory, applied to flaking forces and lithic analysis. Paper presented to the Conference on Lithic Use-Wear, Vancouver, Canada, Mar.

  • Spencer, L. (1974). Replicative experiments in the manufacture and use of a Great Basin atlatl In Hester, T. R., Mildner, M., and Spencer, L. (eds.),Great Basin Atlatl Studies, Ballena Press, Ramona, CA, pp. 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperrazza, J., and Kokinakis, W. (1968). Ballistic limits of tissue and clothing.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 152: 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J. D. (1972). Mechanical basis of percussion flaking.American Antiquity 37: 34–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes, H. (1996).The Simple Science of Flight: From Insects to Jumbo Jets. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. H. (1978). Arrowheads and atlat darts: how the stones got the shaft.American Antiquity 43: 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, A. R., and Barnes, J. (1979). Reinventing the atlatl.Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society 10: 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, G. E. (1974).Arrowheads and Projectile Points, Arrowhead, Garden Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbicky-Todd, E. (1984).Communal Buffalo Hunting Among the Plains Indians, Archaeological Survey of Alberta Occasional Paper No. 24, Alberta, Canada.

  • Waldorf, D. C. (1979).The Art of Flintknapping, Litho, Cassville, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. S. (1980).Recent data bearing on the question of the origins of the bow and arrow in the Great Basin.American Antiquity 45(1): 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welty, J. R., Wicks, C. E., and Wilson, R. E. (1969).Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points.American Antiquity,48(2): 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, S.S. Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry. J Archaeol Method Theory 5, 345–408 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428421

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428421

Key Words

Navigation