Skip to main content
Log in

Thoughts on new approaches to combining the archaeological and historical records

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For decades, archaeologists have looked for an appropriate means to integrate archaeological findings with the textual record. Often, in the past, the written word has been privileged over material remains. In this summary, which draws in part from the individual papers in this special issue, a new, more balanced approach that gives increased weight and greater independence to archaeological data is proposed. A series of implications and suggestions for current theoretical development in archaeology are advanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Bernardini, W. (1996). Transitions in social organization: A predictive model from Southwestern archaeology.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 15: 372–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1972).An Archaeological Perspective, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, S. R., and Binford, L. R. (eds.) (1968).New Perspectives in Archeology, Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, E. A. (1994). Egalitarianism, hierarchy, and centralization in the pueblos. In Wills, W. H., and Leonard, R. D. (eds.),The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1972).The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. 2 vols. (S. Reynolds, trans.), Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, T. (1990). Medieval archaeology and the tyranny of the historical record. In Austin, D., and Alcock, L. (eds.),From the Baltic to the Black Sea, Studies in Medieval Archaeology, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1996). Empire of uniformity.Discover 17: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhausen, L. von. (1993). On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology.Antiquity 67: 839–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G. M. (1994) Toward an archaeology without polarization: Comments on contemporary theory. In Marcus, J. and Zeitlin, J. F. (eds.),Caciques and Their People: A Volume in Honor of Ronald Spores, Anthropological Papers, No. 89, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. V. (ed.), (1976).The Early Mesoamerican Village, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1987).An Urchin in the Storm: Essays About Books and Ideas, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1986).Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1940). The conceptual structure in Middle American studies. In Hay, C. L., Linton, R. L., Lothrop, S. K., Shapiro, H. L., and Vaillant, G. C. (eds.),The Maya and Their Neighbors, Appleton-Century, New York, pp. 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, A. B. (ed.) (1992).Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1935). History and science in anthropology.American Anthropologist 35: 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. O., Neff, H., Graybill, D. A., Michaelsen, J., and Ambos, E. (1996). Risk, climatic variability, and the study of Southwestern prehistory: An evolutionary approach.American Antiquity 61: 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R. D., and Reed, H. E. (1993). Population aggregation in the prehistoric American Southwest: A selectionist model.American Antiquity 58: 648–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. E. (1994). Ethnographic analogs: Strategies for reconstructing archaeological cultures. In Gumerman, G. J., and Gell-Mann, M. (eds.),Understanding Complexity in the Prehistoric Southwest, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, K. G., (1995). Culture contact studies: Redefining the relationship between prehistoric and historical archaeology.American Antiquity 60: 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, K. G., and Upham, S. (1989). Complex societies in the prehistoric American Southwest: A consideration of the controversy. In Upham, S., Lightfoot, K. G., and Jewett, R. A. (eds.),The Sociopolitical Structure of Prehistoric Southwestern Societies, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. H., and Saitta, D. J. (1996). Although they have petty captains, they obey them badly: The dialectics of prehispanic western Pueblo social organization.American Antiquity 61: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. W. (1987) The practice of archaeology in China today.Antiquity 61: 282–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, F. (1974).The Study of Prehistoric Change, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S. (1995). Equality and hierarchy: Holistic approaches to understanding social dynamics in the Pueblo Southwest. In Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. M. (eds.),Foundations of Social Inequality, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., and Bahn, P. (1996).Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice, 2nd ed., Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, S. H. (1987). Presidential address: State formation in Asia—Prolegmenon to a comparative study.The Journal of Asian Studies 46: 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1990). Review ofArchaeology as Long-term History.American Antiquity 55: 423–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1987).Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E. (1992). Rhythms of change in postclassic central Mexico: Archaeology, ethnohistory, and Braudelian model. In Knapp, A. B. (ed.),Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, pp. 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A. B. (1993). Concepts of time and approaches to analogical reasoning in historical perspective.American Antiquity 58: 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. W. (1964).A Study of Archeology, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale (originally published 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist.Man 19: 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1989).A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham, S. (1987). The tyranny of ethnographic analogy in Southwestern archaeology. In Gaines, S. W. (ed.),Coasts, Plains, and Deserts: Essays in Honor of Reynold J. Ruppé, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 38, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. M. (1988).Deliberate Acts: Changing Hopi Culture Through the Oraibi Split, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G. R., and Sabloff, J. A. (1993).A History of American Archaeology, 3rd ed, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, W. H., and Leonard, R. D. (eds.) (1994).The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, H. M. (1978). The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology.American Antiquity 43: 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feinman, G.M. Thoughts on new approaches to combining the archaeological and historical records. J Archaeol Method Theory 4, 367–377 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428069

Key Words

Navigation