Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring biological diversity

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diversity of a set of species refers to the joint dissimilarity of the species in the set. This paper discusses the measurement of diversity from the set of pairwise distances between the species in the set. A measure called the effective number of species is developed from a non-parametric probability inequality and is shown to have a simple interpretation in terms of comparing linear experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eaton, M.L. (1992). A group action on covariances with applications to the comparison of linear normal experiments. Unpublished mimeo, Department of Statistics, University of Minnesota.

  • Eiswerth, M.E. and Haney, J.C. (1992). Allocating conservation expenditures across habitats: Accounting for inter-species genetic distinctiveness.Ecological Economics,5, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallot, S. (1966). A bound for the maximum of a number of random variables.Journal of Applied Probability,3, 556–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gantmacher, F.R. (1959). The Theory of Matrices. (Chelsea, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis.Biometrika,29, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, O.H. and Torgersen, E.N. (1974). Comparison of linear normal experiments.Annals of Statistics,2, 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kounias, E.G. (1968). Bounds for the probability of a union, with applications.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,39, 2154–2158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method.Psychometrika,29, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E.C. (1975).Ecological Diversity. (Wiley Interscience, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E. (1991). A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolate-producing plants, Part I: Phenetics.Systematic Botany,16, 598–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. (1973).Numerical Taxonomy. (Freeman, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, A.R., Polasky, S., and Broadus, J.M. (1993). On the measurement of biological diversity.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,24, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J., and Williams, P.H. (1991). What to protect — Systematics and the agony of choice.Biological Conservation,55, 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. (1992). On diversity.Quarterly Journal of Economics,107, 363–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1992).The Diversity of Life. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solow, A.R., Polasky, S. Measuring biological diversity. Environ Ecol Stat 1, 95–103 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426650

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426650

Keywords

Navigation