Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of polyploidy in cultivatedNarcissus subgenusNarcissus

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the availability of vegetatively-propagated ancestral cultivars ofNarcissus together with their modern descendants, the majority of which have known dates of introduction, the evolution of polyploidy in cultivation during the past hundred years is traced using previously published chromosome counts. From an original range of largely diploid species triploid cultivars arose initially, followed later by tetraploids. After an early gradual increase which was similar to those of diploids and triploids the rate of introduction of new tetraploid cultivars accelerated rapidly from the 1920's onwards, with the result that tetraploids now comprise nearly 75% of the cultivars of which the chromosome numbers are known. Higher polyploid cultivars are very rare (5x) or unknown (6x, 8x etc.). The horticulturally optimal tetraploid level inNarcissus differs from the optimal levels of ploidy inHyacinthus (3x–4x) andTulipa (2x) which have growth habits that are similar to those ofNarcissus and which are also subject to similar breeding and propagation methods, but the optimal chromosome numbers of all three genera are comparable (2n=24−31). As their chromosomes are of an equivalent order of size there is thus an optimal DNA amount affecting growth rate and horticultural value in these genera which must be approximately the same in each one, but which is reached at different levels of ploidy depending on differences in basic chromosome number. A loss of vigour and/or growth rate rate with a consequent lack of favourable artificial selection probably occurs if the optimal DNA amount is greatly exceeded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Daffodil Society, 1981. Daffodil Data Bank. Iowa Methodist Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. D., 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 181: 109–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandham, P. E., 1982. Inter-embryo competition in the progeny of autotriploid Aloineae (Liliaceae). Genetica 59: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandham, P. E. & Bhattarai, S., 1977. The effect of B chromosome number on chiasma frequency within and between individuals of Gibasis linearis (Commelinaceae). Chromosoma 64: 343–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandham, P. E. & Kirton, P. R. The chromosomes of species, hybrids and cultivars of Narcissus L. (Amaryllidaceae). Kew Bull. 42 (in press).

  • Darlington, C. D., 1963. Chromosome botany and the origins of cultivated plants. 2nd edition. George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D., Hair, J. B. & Hurcombe, R., 1951. The history of the garden hyacinths. Heredity 5: 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mol, W. E., 1923. The disappearance of the diploid and triploid Magnicoronatae narcissi from the larger cultures and the appearance in their place of tetraploid forms. K. Akad. Amst. Proc. Sect. Sci. 25: 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A., 1950. La meiose chez Narcissus poetaz ‘Alsace’. Genet. Iber. 2: 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A., 1967. Contribution à la connaissance de la biosystematique de quelques espèces du genre Narcissus L. Portug. Acta. Biol. B 9: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. & De Almeidá, M. T., 1971. Sur les nombres chromosomiques de quelques formes horticoles du genre Narcissus L. Bol. Soc. Brot. Ser. 2 44: 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, B., 1983. Through the looking glass: a sceptical cytologist in a molecular wonderland. In: Kew chromosome conference II. Brandham, P. E. & Bennett, M. D. (eds), pp. 305–310. George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, S., 1929. Kariological studies of the Narcissus plant. I. Somatic chromosome numbers of some garden varieties and some meiotic phases of a triploid variety. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ. Ser. B 4: 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philp, J., 1934. Narcissus chromosome numbers. Roy. Hort. Soc. Daffodil Year Book 5: 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcova, O., 1969. Die Chromosomenzahlen bei Gartentulpen. Acta Pruhon. 21: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throckmorton, 1980. Daffodils to show and grow, and abridged classified list of daffodil names. Royal Horticultural Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upcott, M. & Philp, J., 1939. The genetic structure of Tulipa IV: balance, selection and fertility. J. Genet. 38: 91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. P., 1952. The history of the garden Narcissus. Heredity 6: 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandham, P.E. Evolution of polyploidy in cultivatedNarcissus subgenusNarcissus . Genetica 68, 161–167 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02424439

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02424439

Keywords

Navigation