Skip to main content
Log in

New palaeomagnetic data from Central Iran and a Triassic palaeoreconstruction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geologische Rundschau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New pole positions for Triassic and Cretaceous times have been obtained from volcanic and sedimentary sequences in Central Iran. These new results confirm the general trend of the Apparent Polar Wander Path (APWP) of the Central-East-Iran microplate (CEIM) from the Triassic through the Tertiary as published by Soffel and Förster (1983, 1984). Two new palaeopoles for the Triassic of the CEIM have been obtained; limestones and tuffs from the Nakhlak region yield a mean direction of 094.0°/25.0°, N=12, k=4.1,α 95=24.7°, after bedding correction, corresponding to a palaeopole position of 310.8°E; 3.9°S, and volcanic rocks from the Sirjan regions yield a mean direction of 114.5°/35.1°, N=44, k=45.9,α 95=3.2° after bedding correction and a palaeopole position of 295.8°E; 10.3°N. Combining these with the two previously published results yields a new palaeopole position of 317.5°E; 12.7°N, for the Triassic of the CEIM, thus confirming that large counterclockwise rotations of the CEIM have occurred since the Triassic time. New results have also been obtained from Cretaceous limestones from the Saghand region of the CEIM. The mean direction of 340.7°/26.3°, N=33, k=44.3,α 95=3.8°, and the corresponding palaeopole position of 283.1°E; 64.4°N, is in agreement with previously determined Cretaceous palaeopole positions of the CEIM. Furthermore, results have also been obtained from Triassic dolomite, limestone, sandstone and siltstone from the Natanz region, which is located to the west of the CEIM. A total of 161 specimens from 44 cores taken at five sites gave a mean direction of the five sites at 033.3°/25.1°, N=5, k=69.0,α 95=9.3° and a palaeopole position of 167.2°E; 53.7°N. They pass the positive fold test of McElhinny (1964) on the level of 99% confidence. This pole position is in fairly good agreement with the mean Triassic pole position of the Turan Plate (149°E; 49°N). It indicates that the area of Natanz has not undergone the large counterclockwise rotation relative to the Turan plate since the Triassic, which has been shown for the CEIM. A Triassic palaeogeographic reconstruction of Iran, Arabia (Gondwana) and the Turan Plate (Eurasia) is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adib D (1978) Geology of the metamorphic complex at the south-western margin of the Central-East Iran microplate (Neyriz area). N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 156:393–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker H, Förster H, Soffel HC (1973) Central Iran, a former part of Gondwanaland? Palaeomagnetic evidence from Infracambrian rocks and iron ores of the Bafq area, Central Iran. Z Geophys 39:953–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunn JH (1976) Über die Entstehung gefalteter Ketten: Kollisions-Tektonik und induzierte Bögen. Z Dtsch Geol Ges 127:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudzadeh M, Seyed-Emami K (1972) Stratigraphy of the Triassic Nakhlak Group Anarak region, Central Iran. Geol Surv Iran Rep 28:5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudzadeh M, Schmidt K (1982) Zur Trias des Iran. Geol Rundsch 71:1021–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudzadeh M, Weber-Diefenbach K (1987) Contribution to the paleogeography, stratigraphy and tectonics of the Upper Paleozoic of Iran. N Jahrb Geol Paläont Abh 175:121–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudzadeh M, Soffel HC, Schmidt K (1981) On the rotation of the Central-East-Iran microplate. N Jahrb Geol Paläontol MH 3:180–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Khramov AN, Rodionov VP (1980) Palaeomagnetism and reconstruction of the palaeogeographic positions of the Siberian and Russian Plates during the Late Proterozoic and Palaeozoic. J Geomagn Geol 32 (Suppl III):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny MW (1964) Statistical significance of the fold test in Paleomagnetism. Geophys J R Astr Soc 8:338–340

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden P, McElhinny MW (1990) Classification of the reversal test in palaeomagnetism. Geophys J Int 103:725–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolf C (1991) Paläo- und gesteinsmagnetische Untersuchungen an Proben aus dem Zentraliran und Reinterpretation paläomagnetischer Ergebnisse aus der Zentral-Ost-Iran Mikroplatte (CEIM) unter Berücksichtigung geologischer Modelle. Dissertation, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften, Universität München, pp 1–125

  • Schmidt S (1992) Paläomagnetische und gesteinsmagnetische Untersuchungen an Gesteinen aus dem NW Iran. MSc. Thesis, Institut für Allgemeine und Angewandte Geophysik, Universität München, pp 1–110

  • Schmidt K, Soffel HC (1983) Mesozoic-Cenozoic geological events in Central-East-Iran and their relation to palaeomagnetic results. Geol Surv Iran Rep 51:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K, Soffel HC (1984) Mesozoic-Cenozoic geological events in Central-East-Iran and their relation to palaeomagnetic results. N Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 168:173–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffel HC, Förster HG (1980) Apparent polar wander path of Central Iran and its geotectonic interpretation. J Geomagn Geoelectr (Suppl III):117–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffel HC, Förster HG (1983) Polar wander path of the Central-East-Iran microplate including new results. Geol Surv Iran Rep 51:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffel HC, Förster HG (1984) Polar wander path of the Central-East-Iran microplate including new results. N Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 168:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffel HC, Förster H, Becker H (1975) Preliminary polar wander path of Central Iran. J Geophys 41:541–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffel HC, Davoudzadeh M, Rolf C (1989) Palaeomagnetic investigations on Phanerozoic formations from Iran: reinterpretation of measurements between 1972 and 1982. Münchner Geophys Mitt Münchner Univers Schriften 4:23–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffel HC, Davoudzadeh M, Rolf C (1992) A New Polar Wander Path of the Central East Iran Microplate (CEIM) and its tectonic interpretation. Geosci Sci Q J Geol Surv Iran 2 (5):2–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöcklin J (1974) Possible ancient continental margins in Iran. In: Burk CA, Drake CL (eds) The geology of continental margins, pp 873–887

  • Stöcklin J (1977) Structural correlation of the Alpine ranges between Iran and Central Asia. Mem Soc Geol France Ser H 8:333–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Takin M (1972) Iranian geology and continental drift in the Middle East. Nature 235 (5334):147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Voo R (1993) Palaeomagnetism of the Atlantic, Tethys and Iapetus Oceans. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensink H (1979) The implication of some palaeomagnetic data from Iran for its structural history. Geol Mynbouw 58:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensink H (1982) Tectonic inferences of palaeomagnetic data from some Mesozoic formations in Central Iran. J Geophys 51:12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensink H (1983) Palaeomagnetism of Red Beds of Early Devonian age from Central Iran. Earth Planet Sci Lett 63:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wensink H, Varekamp JC (1980) Palaeomagnetism of basalts from Alborz: Iran part of Asia in the Cretaceous. Tectonophysics 68:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi M (1973) Etude géologique de la région de Soh (W de l’Iran Central). Geol Surv Iran Rep 27:1–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soffel, H.C., Schmidt, S., Davoudzadeh, M. et al. New palaeomagnetic data from Central Iran and a Triassic palaeoreconstruction. Geol Rundsch 85, 293–302 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422235

Key words

Navigation