Abstract
The decisions involved in the institution of artificial feeding in patients with chronic and/or terminal illness are difficult. They are more complex when one is deciding if nutrition and hydration are to be withdrawn. In both instances the decision must be based on a combination of factors: the patient's right to self-determination; documented medical evidence demonstrating the need for artificial feeding, combined with a risk/benefit analysis if alternative alimentation is recommended; and an appreciation of prior legal decisions as they relate to the implementation of alternative forms of nutrients to sustain life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1983
The American Medical Association: Statement of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Withholding or with-drawing life prolonging medical treatment. Chicago, Illinois, 1986
In re: Rodas, No. 86PR 139 (Colo. Dist. Ct. Mesa County Jan. 22, 1987)
Brophy vs. New England Sinai Hospital Inc. 497 N.E. 2nd, 626 Mass., 1986
In re: Conroy, 98 NJ 321, 486 A 2d, 1209 (NJ, 1985)
In re: Guardianship of Estelle M. Browning, Case No. 87-1176-6D, Div. 003, Fla. 1989
In re: Hazelton, 6 Va. Cir. Ct. Op. at 417., 1987
Annas GJ: Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.Hastings Center Rep December 31, 1988
National Information Service Branch: The Bedside Evaluation of Dysphagia (videotape), Washington, D.C., 1989
Jones B, Donner MW: How I do it: examination of the patient with dysphagia.Radiology 167:319–326, 1988
Robbins JA et al.: A modification of the modified barium-swallow.Dysphagia 2:83–86, 1987
Groher ME: Bolus management and aspiration pneumonia in patients with pseudobulbar dysphagia.Dysphagia 2:215–216, 1987
Miller RM, Groher ME: General considerations in treatment, neurologic. In: Groher ME (ed):Dysphagia: Diagnosis and Management. Stoneham, MA: Butterworths, 1984
Campbell-Taylor I, et al.: Oro-esophageal tube feeding: an alternative to nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes.Dysphagia 2:200–201, 1988
Cohen EN, Cohen MM: Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendationsMed Staff Counselors 2:23–35, 1988
Ciocon JO et al.: Tube feedings in elderly patients.Arch Intern Med 148:429–443, 1988
Lo B, Dornbrand L: Understanding the benefits and burdens of tube feedings.Arch Intern Med 149:1925–1926, 1989
Lo B, McLeod, Saika: Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment.Arch Intern Med 146:1613–1620, 1986
Miskovitz P, Weg A, Groher M: Must dysphagic patients always receive food and water?Dysphagia 2:125–126, 1988
Zerwekh J: The dehydration question.Nursing 13:47–51, 1983
Printz LA: Is withholding hydration a valid comfort measure in the terminally ill?Geriatrics 43:84–87, 1988
Dresser RS, Boisaubin EV: Ethics, law, and nutrition support.Arch Intern Med 145:122–128, 1985
Quill TE: Nasogastric feeding tubes in a group of chronically ill elderly patients in a community hospital.Arch Intern Med 149:1937–1941, 1989
Spritz N: Personal communication, 1990
In re: Requena, 213 N.J. Super. 425, 517 A 2d 886, 1986
Ravitch WJ et al.: The swallowing center: concepts and procedures.Gastrointest Radiol 10:255–261, 1985
Bosma JF: Sensorimotor examination of the mouth and pharynx.Front Oral Physiol 2:77–107, 1976
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groher, M.E. Ethical dilemmas in providing nutrition. Dysphagia 5, 102–109 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412652
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412652