Skip to main content
Log in

Digital volume correlation including rotational degrees of freedom during minimization

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital volume correlation is a new experimental technique that allows the measurement of the full-field strain tensor in three dimensions. We describe the addition of rotational degrees of freedom into the minimization problem for digital volume correlation in order to improve the overall performance of the strain measurement. A parameterization of rotations that is particularly suited to the minimization problem is presented, based on the angle-axis representation of finite rotations. The partial derivative of both a normalized cross-correlation coefficient and the sum-of-squares correlation coefficient are derived for use with gradient-based minimization algorithms. The addition of rotation is shown to greatly reduce the measurement error when even small amounts of rigid body rotation are present in an artificially rotated test volume. In an aluminum foam sample loaded in compression, including rotational degrees of freedom produced smoother contours of minimum principal strain. Renderings of the aluminum foam architecture in areas of low, medium and high rotation showed material deformation pattern in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knauss, Wolfgang G., “Perspectives in Experimental Solid Mechanics,”Int. J. Solids and Structures,37,251–266 (2000).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldkamp, L.A., Goldstein, S.A., Parfitt, A.M., Jesion, G., andKleerekoper, M., “The Direct Examination of Three-dimensional Bone Architecture in Vitro By Computed Tomography,”J. Bone and Mineral Research,4 (1),3–10 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Müller, R., Koller, B., Hildebrand, T., Laib, A., Gianolini, S., andRüegsegger, P., “Resolution Dependency of Microstructural Properties of Cancellous Bone Based on Three-dimensional μ-tomography,”Technology and Health Care,4,113–119 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Odgaard, A., “Three-dimensional Methods for the Quantification of Cancellous Bone Architecture,” Bone,20 (4),315–328 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bay, Brian K., Smith, Tait S., Fyhrie, David P., andSaad, Malik, “Digital Volume Correlation: Three-dimensional Strain Mapping Using X-ray Tomography,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,39 (3),217–226 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutton, M.A., McNeill, S.R., Jang, J., andBabai, M., “Effects of Subpixel Image Restoration on Digital Correlation Error Estimates,”Optical Engineering,27 (10),870–877 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chu, T.C., Ranson, W.F., Sutton, M.A., andPeters, W.H., “Applications of Digital-image-correlation Techniques to Experimental Mechanics,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,25 (3),232–244 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruck, H.A., McNeill, S.R., Sutton, M.A., andPeters, W.H., “Digital Image Correlation Using Newton-raphson Method of Partial Differential Correction,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,29 (3),261–267 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu, K.S., Gonzalez, R.C., andLee, C.S.G., Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez, Rafael C. andWoods, Richard E., Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gill, Philip E., Murray, Walter, andWright, Margaret H., Practical Optimization, Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon, William J., Blending-function Methods of Bivariate and Multivariate Interpolation and Approximation, SIAM J. Numerical Analysis,8 (1),158–177 (1971).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lancaster, Peter andŠalkauskas, Kęstutis, Curve and Surface Fitting—An Introduction, Academic Press, San Deigo, CA (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geers, M.G.D., de Borst, R., andBrekelmans, W.A.M., “Computing Strain Fields from Discrete Displacement Fields in 2D-solids,”Int. J. Solids and Structures,33 (29),4293–4307 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, Y., Drangova, M., andPelc, N.J., “Estimation of Deformation Gradient and Strain from Cine-PC Velocity Data,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,16 (6),840–851 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reimann, D.A., Hames, S.M., Flynn, M.J., andFyhrie, D.P., “A Cone Beam Computed Tomography System for True 3D Imaging of Specimens,”Applied Radiation and Isotopes,48 (10),1433–1436 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, T.S., Bay, B.K. & Rashid, M.M. Digital volume correlation including rotational degrees of freedom during minimization. Experimental Mechanics 42, 272–278 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410982

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410982

Key Words

Navigation