Skip to main content
Log in

Bone histomorphometric reproducibility in normal patients

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To study bone histomorphometry reproducibility in normal subjects, we performed during orthopedic surgery bone biopsies in 16 post-menopausal women. Each woman had four bone biopsies, two at the usual site in the iliac crest, one on the left and one on the right side, and two other biopsies just behind the usual site, one at each side. We performed measurements of trabecular bone volume, relative osteoid volume, osteoid surfaces, osteoclastic resorption surfaces and calcification front. The average values of the 16 patients were compared, on the one hand, two by two, by a student test, and on the other hand, by a variance analysis. By these two methods the results showed no significant difference between the average values of the 16 patients at each location for any of the histomorphometric parameters studied. However, there was a location variation which was estimated by the intra-individual variation for a given patient. On the other hand, we calculated from the variance analysis the location variance for a group of 10 to 100 patients. In any case all the parameters had a location variation which was high for osteoclastic resorption surfaces and relative osteoid volume when expressed in % of the absolute value of these parameters. The variation of the trabecular bone volume was 0–46. 15% (95% confident limit interval) in a single patient and the hypothetical value of the location variation was 41.6% for a group of 10 patients and 13.0% for a group of 100 patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parfitt, A. M.: Some problems in measuring the amount of bone by histologic techniques. In P. Meunier (ed.): Bone Histomorphometry, pp. 103–113. Second International Workshop, Lyon, June, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giroux, J. M., Courpron, P., and Meunier, P.: Histomorphométrie de l'ostéopénie physiologique sénile. Thesis, Lyon, 1975

  3. Dequeker, J.: Bone Loss in Normal and Pathological Conditions. Leuwen University Press, 1972

  4. Visser, W. J., Niermans, H. J., Roelofs, J. M. M., Raymakers, J. A., Duursma, S. A.: Comparative morphometry of bone biopsies obtained by two different methods from the right and left iliac crest. In P. J. Meunier (ed.): Bone Histomorphometry, pp. 79–87. Second International Workshop, Lyon, June, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melsen, F., Melsen, B., Mosekilde, L.: An evaluation of the quantitative parameters applied in bone histology, Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. [A]86:63–69, 1978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritz, E., Krempien, B., Bommer, J., Jesdinski, J.: A critical analysis of microphotometry in metabolic osteopathy, Verh. Dtsch. Ges. Pathol. 363–365, 1974

  7. Bergot, C., Laval-Jeantet, Laval-Jeantet, M.: Etude critique des variations de la mesure de la masse osseuse par biopsie illiaque, Rev. Rhum.45:317–324, 1978

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bordier, P., Matraj, T. H., Miravet, L., Hioco, D.: Mesure histologique de la masse et de la résorption des travées osseuses, Pathol. Biol.12:1238–1243, 1964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck, J. S., Nordin, B. E. C.: Histological assessment of osteoporosis by iliac crest biopsy, J. Pathol. Bacteriol.80:391–397, 1960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, H. A., Peart, K. M.: Quantitative observation on mineralized and non mineralized bone in the iliac crest, J. Clin. Pathol.25n:277–286, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitehouse, W. J.: Cancellous bone in the anterior part of the iliac crest, Calcif. Tissue Res.23:67–76, 1977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyce, B. F., Courpron, P., Meunier, P. J.: Amount of bone in osteoporosis and physiological senile osteopenia. Comparison of two histomorphometric parameters, Metab. Bone Dis. Rel. Res.1:35–38, 1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Courpron, P.: Données histologiques quantitatives sur le vieillissement osseux humain. Thesis, Lyon, 1972

  14. Haas, H. G., Dambacher, M. A., Guncaga, J., Lauffen-Burger, Th., Olah, A. J.: Efficacy of 1–25 (OH)2 D3 in osteoporosis. IVth International Workshop on Calcified Tissue, Rhodes, April, 1979

  15. Malluche, H. H., Goldsteien, D. A., Massry, S. G.: Management of renal osteodystrophy with 1–25 (OH)2 D3, Mineral Electrolyte Metab.2:48–55, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maziere and Kuntz: In vivo analysis by bone calcium by local neutron activation of the hand: results in normal and osteoporotic subjects, J. Nucl. Med.20:85–92, 1979

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Vernejoul, M.C., Kuntz, D., Miravet, L. et al. Bone histomorphometric reproducibility in normal patients. Calcif Tissue Int 33, 369–374 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409458

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409458

Key words

Navigation