Skip to main content
Log in

A performance measure for mutual funds using the Connor-Korajczyk methodology: An empirical study

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the performance of a sample of bond, stock, and balanced funds. Close attention is paid to the bond versus equity composition of the mutual funds and how this asset composition affects the performance measure. This research includes the period from January 1977 through March 1984. The results of the analysis show that none of these mutual funds categories has outperformed the market. Fund managers in this sample are unable to predict security prices consistently to warrant the associated costs. In addition, the “goodness of fit” varied significantly between the types of funds examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banz, R.W., “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks,”Journal of Financial Economics 9, 3–18 (March 1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., “Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis,”Journal of Finance 32, 663–682 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Marshall E. and Irwin Friend, “A New Look at the Capital Asset Pricing Model,”Journal of Finance 28, 19–34 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, Gary, “Funds, Factors, and Diversification in Arbitrage Pricing Models,”Econometrica 51, 1305–1323 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, Gary and Michael Rothschild, “Arbitrage Factor Structure and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets,”Econometrica 51, 1281–1304 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Eric C. and Wilbur G. Lewellen, “Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment Performance,”Journal of Business 57, 57–72 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, Gregory and Robert A. Korajczyk, “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis,”Journal of Financial Economics 15, 373–394 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhrymes, Phoebus J., Irwin Friend, and N. Bukent Gultekin, “A Critical Re-examination of the Empirical Evidence on the Arbitage Pricing Theory,”Journal of Finance 39, 323–346 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, Phillip H. and Stephen A. Ross, “Yes, the APT is Testable,”Journal of Finance 40, 1172–1188 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabozzi, Frank J., Jack C. Francis, and Cheng F. Lee, “Generalized Functional Form for Mutual Fund Returns,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 15, 1107–1119 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F., “Components of Investment Performance,”Journal of Finance 27, 551–567 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, Roy D., “Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Business 57, 73–96 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C., “Optimal Utilization of Market Forecasts and the Evaluation of Investment Performance,” inMathematical Methods in Investment and Finance, G.P. Szego and K. Shell (eds.), Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C., “Risk the Pricing of Capital Assets and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios,”Journal of Business 42, 167–247 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C. “The Performance of Mutual Fund in the Period 1945–1964,”Journal of Finance 39, 389–416 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D.B., “Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Further Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Financial Economics 11, 13–32 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, Donald B., “Dividends Yields and Stock Returns: Implications of Abnormal January Returns,”Journal of Financial Economics 14, 473–489 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon, S.J. and F.C. Jen, “The Investment Performance of Mutual Funds: An Empirical Investigation of Timing, Selectivity, and Market Efficiency,”Journal of Business 52, 263–289 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Cheng F., Joseph E. Finnerty, and Donald H. Wort,Security Analysis and Portfolio Management, Glenview, IL, Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litzenberger, Robert H. and Krishna Ramaswamy, “The Effect of the Personal Taxes and Dividends on Capital Asset Prices,”Journal of Financial Economics 76, 163–195 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, John, “Objectives and Performance and Mutual Funds: 1960–1964,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 9, 311–333 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert C., “On Market Timing the Investment Performance. I. An Equilibrium Theory of Value for Market Forecasts,”Journal of Business 54, 363–406 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, M.R., “Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies Based on Earnings Yields and Market Values,”Journal of Financial Economics 8, 19–46 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, Richard, “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Test Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory,”Journal of Financial Economics 4, 129–176 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, Richard, “Ambiguity when Performance is Measured by the Securities Market Line,”Journal of Finance 33, 1051–1069 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, Richard and Stephen A. Ross, “An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory,”Journal of Finance 35, 1073–1103 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Stephen A., “Return, Risk, and Arbitrage,” in I. Friend and J.L. Bicksler,Risk and Return in Finance, Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Stephen, “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing,”Journal of Economic Theory 13, 341–360 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanken, Jay, “The Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Is it Testable?”Journal of Finance 37, 1129–1140 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, William F., “Mutual Fund Performance,”Journal of Finance 39, 119–138 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, Maurice M.,Multivariate Analysis: Techniques for Educational and Psychological Research, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frohlich, C.J. A performance measure for mutual funds using the Connor-Korajczyk methodology: An empirical study. Rev Quant Finan Acc 1, 427–434 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408401

Key words

Navigation