Abstract
Mössbauer spectroscopy was used to compare Fe−Cr−Ni alloys prepared by different electrochemical as well as thermal methods. The main phase of the electrodeposits was ferromagnetic contrary to the thermally prepared alloys of same composition, which were paramagnetic. Obvious differences can be observed among the spectra of electrodeposited samples of different composition. Narrower line width and smaller paramagnetic contribution can be observed in samples electrodeposited onto A1 substrate compared to those in samples plated onto graphite with modified electrochemical parameters. Changes in hyperfine field distribution of as-deposited and aged samples indicate a precipitation process due to the heat treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.U. Chisholm, The structure and properties of ternary Ni−Cr−Fe electrodeposited alloys. Review, Paisley College of Technology (1985).
A. Watson, C.U. Chisholm and M.R. El-Sharif: Trans. Inst. Met. Finish, 64 (1986) 149.
A. Watson, C.U. Chisholm and M.R. El-Sharif: Trans. Inst. Met. Finish, 60 (1988) 34.
A. Vértes, A. Watson, C.U. Chisholm, I. Czakó-Nagy, E. Kuzmann, M.R. El-Sharif: Electrochimica Acta, 32 (1987) 1761.
A. Watson, E. Kuzmann, A. Vértes, C.U. Chisholm, M.R. El-Sharif, I. Czakó-Nagy: Trans. Inst. Met. Finish (1988) accepted for publication.
E. Kuzmann, R. Oshima and F. E. Fujita, Proc. Int. Conf. on the Appl. of the Mössbauer Effect. Jaipur (1981) 553.
S. Nagy, E. Kuzmann, A. Vértes, G. Szabó, G. Konczos: Nucl. Instr. Met. (1988) in press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzmann, E., Czakó-Nagy, I., Vértes, A. et al. Mössbauer study of electrodeposited Fe−Cr−Ni alloys. Hyperfine Interact 45, 397–402 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02405905
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02405905