Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of facilitation upon group meetings has been a topic of research and debate for over 40 years. However, with the emergence and increasing usage of Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS), the role of facilitators is once more being addressed. Facilitators aim to substantially increase the effectiveness of group working, making meetings more productive and efficient through the management of both content and process. However, while the benefit that facilitators can bring is acknowledged, developing the necessary skills and techniques is more problematic. There are few manuals for would-be faciliators to draw upon, and much of their ability is acquired through experience. This article therefore attempts to increase the knowledge available and to provide facilitators with some practical suggestions. The research focuses on a series of interviews with group members (participants) who had used a particular GDSS—Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA)—for organizational decision making. From the analysis of the interviews, a number of reoccurring issues were identified which are presented as a set of learning points. These cover not only the workshop/meeting itself, but also the pre-workshop and post-workshop stages. The article also reflects on the impact which these identified learning points have on design and future GDSS development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, F. (1991). “Consideration of a Specific Group Decision Support Methodology in the Light of the Group Decision Support Systems Literature.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • AckermannF. (1990). “The Role of Computers in Group Decision Support.” In C.Eden and J.Radford (eds.),Tackling Strategic Problems—The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • AckermannF. (1992). “Strategic Direction through Burning Issues,”OR Insight 5(3), 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AckermannF., S.Cropper, and C.Eden. (1992). “Moving between Groups and Individuals Using a DSS,”Journal of Decision Systems 1(1), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • AnsonR. (1990). “Facilitating Successful Electronic Meetings.” Unpublished working paper, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ApplegateL.M., R.B.Konsynski, and J.F.Nunamaker. (1987). “A Group Decision Support System for Idea Generation and Issue Analysis in Organizational Planning,”Journal of Management Information Systems 3, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J.M. (1988). “Strategic Planning and the Nature of Big Wins,”Public Money and Management (Autumn), 11–15.

  • BurgessF. (1982).Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual. London: George Allan and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaronR. (1986).Behavior in Organizations. London: Allyn and Bacon Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • BelbinR.M. (1981).Management Teams—Why They Succeed or Fail. Oxford: Heinemann Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • BostromB., R.Anson, and V.Clawson. (1993). “Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems.” In L.Jessup and J.Valacich (eds.),Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • BryantJ. (1989).Problem Management—A Guide for Producers and Players, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • CleggS. and D.Dunkerly. (1977).Critical Issues in Organizations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • CropperS.A. (1984). “Style and the Transferability of O.R. Methodologies.” Working paper, University of Sussex, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • CropperS., C.Eden, and F.Ackermann. (1990). “Keeping Sense of Accounts Using Computer-Based Cognitive Maps,”Social Science Computer Review 8, 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CropperS., W.Telford, and F.Ackermann. (1992). “Quality Assurance and Improvement—The Role of Strategy Making,”International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 5(3), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus, A. (1988). “Planning as Learning,”Harvard Business Review (March/April).

  • DicksonG.W., L.Robinson, R.Heath, and J.E.Lee. (1988). “Observations on GDSS Interactions: Chauffeured, Facilitated, and User-Driven Systems,”Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 3, 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiesingP. (1972).Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. (1988). “Cognitive Mapping,”European Journal of Operational Research 36, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. (1989). “Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA).” In J.Rosenhead (ed.),Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. (1990a). “The Unfolding Nature of Group Decision Support—Two Dimensions of Skill.” In C.Eden and J.Radford (eds.),Tackling Strategic Problems—The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. (1990b). “Managing the Environment as a Means to Managing Complexity.” In C.Eden and J.Radford (eds.),Tackling Strategic Problems—The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. (1991). “A Framework for Thinking About Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS),”Group Decision and Negotiation 1(2), 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1993). “From the Playpen to the Bombsite: The Changing Nature of Management Science,”Omega, in press.

  • EdenC. and D.Sims. (1979). “On the Nature of Problems in Consulting Practice,”Omega 7, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. and F.Ackermann. (1989). “Strategic Options in Development and Analysis (SODA)—Using a Computer to Help with the Management of Strategic Vision.” In G.Doukidis, F.Land, and G.Miller (eds.),Knowledge Based Management Support Systems. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdenC. and F.Ackermann. (1992). “Strategy Development and Implementation—The Role of a Group Decision Support System. In R.Bostrom, R.Watson and S.Kinney (eds.),Computer Augmented Teamwork—A Guided Tour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdenC., F.Ackermann, and S.Cropper. (1992). “The Analysis of Cause Maps,”Journal of Management Studies 29(3), 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • FriedmanP.G. (1989). “Upstream Facilitation—A Proactive Approach to Managing Problem-Solving Groups,”Management Communications Quarterly 3, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • FriendJ., and A.Hickling. (1987).Planning Under Pressure—The Strategic Choice Approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FordyceJ.K.W., and R.Weil, (1971).Managing with People: A Manager's Handbook of Organizational Development Methods. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • GlaserB.G., and A.L.Strauss. (1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrayP. (1985). “Group Decision Support Systems,”Decision Support Systems: A Decade in Perspective 3, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HastingsC. (1986).The Superteam Solution: Successful Teamworking in Organizations. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • HicklingA. (1990). “Decision Spaces: A Scenario about Designing Appropriate Rooms for Group Decision Management.” In C.Eden and J.Radford (eds.),Tackling Strategic Problems—The Role of Group Decision Support, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • HirokawaR., and D.Gouran. (1989). “Facilitation of Group Communication: A Critique of Prior Research and an Agenda for Future Research,”Management Communication Quarterly 3, 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • HuxhamC. (1990). “On Trivialities in Process.” In C.Eden and J.Radford (eds.),Tackling Strategic Problems—The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • HuberG. (1984). “Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems,”Management Information Systems Quarterly 8, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • JonesS. (1987). “Choosing Action Research: A Rationale.” In I.L.Mangham (ed.),Organizational Analysis and Development. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • JessupL.M., and J.S.Valacich. (1992). “On the Study of Group Support Systems: An Introduction to Group Support Systems Research and Development.” In L.M.Jessup and J.S.Valacich (eds.),Group Support Systems—New Perspectives. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • JudsonA. (1990).Making Strategy Happen—Transforming Plans into Reality. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • KellyG. (1955).The Psychology of Personal Constructs: A Theory of Personality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • KreamerK.L., and J.King. (1988). “Computer-Based Systems for Cooperative Work and Group Decision Making: Status of Use and Problems in Development,”ACM Computing Surveys 20, 115–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LewisF., and K.Keleman. (1990). “Experiences with GDSS Development: Lab and Field Studies,”Journal of Information Science 16, 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoflandJ. (1976).Doing Social Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrathJ. (1984).Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • MargerisonC. (1988).Managerial Consulting Skills—A Practical Guide. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • MasonR.O., and I.I.Mitroff. (1981).Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases and Techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoffC.J., and L.Ambrose. (1991). “Empirical Information from the Field: A Practitioner's View of Using GDSS in Business.” In theProceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 3. Los Alamitos, CA: Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MillerG. (1956). “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,”Psychological Review 63, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • MosvickR., and R.Nelson. (1987).We've Got to Start Meeting Like This! A Guide to Successful Business Meeting Management. Glenview IL: Scott Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • NunamakerJ.F., L.M.Applegate, and B.R.Konsynski. (1988). “Computer-Aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support,”Journal of Management Information Systems 3, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • PhillipsL.D. (1989). “People-Centered Group Decision Support.” In G.Doukidis, F.Land, and G.Miller (eds.),Knowledge Based Management Support Systems. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. and M.C. Phillips. (1990). “On Facilitating Groups.” Working paper, Decision Analysis Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science.

  • PinsenneaultA. and K.L.Kreamer. (1990). “The Effects of Electronic Meetings on Group Processes and Outcomes: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,”European Journal of Operational Research 46, 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReasonP., and J.Rowan. (1981).Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ScheinE.H. (1988).Process Consultation—Its Role in Organizational Development. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SengeP. (1990).The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • SteffikM., G.Foster, D.G.Borrow, K.Kahn, S.Lanning, and L.Suchman. (1987). “Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings.”Communications of the ACM 30, 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, 26 Richmond Street, G1 1XH, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

    Fran Ackermann

Authors
  1. Fran Ackermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ackermann, F. Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems. Group Decis Negot 5, 93–112 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404178

Key words

Search

Navigation