Skip to main content
Log in

Plant morphological characteristics and resistance to simulated trampling

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The relationship between responses of plants to trampling and their morphological characteristics was studied in a glasshouse experiment. Thirteen species with four different growth forms were used in this experiment. They were five tussock species.Chloris gayana, Eragrostis tenuifolia, Lolium perenne, Panicum maximum, andSporobolus elongatus; three prostate grasses,Axonopus compressus, Cynodon dactylon, andTrifolium repens, two herbaceous species,Daucus glochidiatus andHypochoeris radicata; and three woody species,Acacia macradenia, Acrotriche aggregata, andSida rhombifolia. These species were subjected to three levels of simulated trampling. For each species, measurements were taken of aboveground biomass, root biomass, leaf length, leaf width, leaf thickness, leaf number, broken leaf number and plant height. Overall, these measurements were greatest in the control plants, moderate in the level of light trampling, and the lowest in the level of heavy trampling. Biomass was used as a basis of the assessment of plant resistance to trampling. Three tussock species,Eragrostis tenuifolia, Lolium perenne, andSporobolus elongatus had a high resistance. Woody and erect herbaceous plants were more intolerant to trampling. There appear to be two processes involved in the reduction of the plant parameters: direct physical damage with portions of the plants detached, and physiological changes, which slow down vegetative growth rates. Plant height was found to be the most sensitive indicator of trampling damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bates, G. H. 1935. The vegetation of wayside and hedgerow.Journal of Ecology 23:470–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, J. M., and M. A. Maun. 1982. A study of the effects of trampling on the vegetation of Lake Huron sand dunes at Pinery Provincial Park.Biological Conservation 24:273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, S. P. 1985. Effects of disturbance by visitors on two woodland orchid species in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA.Biological Conservation 31:211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrkit, D. R. 1987. Statistics Today, A comprehensive introduction. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canaway, P. M. 1975. Turf wear: A literature review.The Journal of Sports and The Turf Research Institute 51:92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1988. Disturbance and recovery of trampled montane grassland and forests in Montana. Research paper. INT-389. US Department of agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.

  • Deans, J. D. 1968. Some aspects of the influence of treading on grasses. PhD thesis. Napier College of Science and Technology, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmond, D. B. 1964. Some effect of sheep treading on the growth of 10 pasture species.New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 7:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, R. E. 1972. Trampled vegetation and floristic convergence in the tropics.Association of Pacific Coast Geographers Yearbook 34:87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fushtey, S. G., D. K. Taylor, and D. Fairey. 1983. The effect of wear stress on survival of pure stands and on mixtures.Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63:317–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goryshina, T. K. 1983. The effect of trampling caused by recreation on the internal structure of the leaf and thallus of some plants.Ekologiya 2:11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr, G. 1982. The impact of trampling by tourists on a high altitudinal grassland in the Tyrolean Alps, Austria.Vegetation 48:209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, E. J. 1966. Sand and water culture method used in the study of plant nutrition, 2nd ed. Commonealth Bureau Horticultural and Plantation Crops. Technical Communication 22. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Farnham Royal, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurko, A. 1983. Trampling effects on species diversity and leaf characteristics of vegetation in the high Tatras mountains.Ekologia (CSSR) 2:281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellomaki, S., and V.-L. Saastamoinen. 1975. Trampling tolerance of forest vegetation.Acta Forestalia Fennica 147:5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, F. R. 1986. A review of major factors influencing plant responses to recreation impacts.Environmental Management 10:637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, M. J. 1973. The effects of trampling and vehicles on natural vegetation. PhD thesis. University College of North Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, M. J. 1975a. A selective review of the ecological effects of human trampling on natural ecosystem.Biological Conservation 7:17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, M. J. 1975b. A theoretical relationship between productivity of vegetation and its ability to tolerate trampling.Biological Conservation 8:251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naito, T. 1969. Changes of alpine vegetation in Mt. Hakkoda due to human treading.Ecological Review 17:171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. F. 1956. Influences of treading on grasslands. PhD thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardhan, P., and R. S. Tripathi. 1983. Competition betweenTrifolium repens andPaspalum dilatatum as related to trampling.Acta Oecologica 4:345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey, J., and H. Mackworth-Praed. 1969. Headley Warren Reserve in 1968. The survey naturalist: Annual report for 1968.

  • Shearman, R. C., and J. B. Beard. 1975. Turf wear tolerance mechanisms: III. Physiological, morphological, and anatomical characteristics associated with turfgrass wear tolerance.Agronomy Journal 67:215–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, J. P. 1974. A comparison of three seedling turf products.The Journal of Sports and The Turf Research Institute 50:95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., and M. J. Liddle. 1991. Field occurrence, recovery and simulated trampling resistance and recovery of two grasses.Biological Conservation 57:187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tothill, J. C., and J. B. Hacker. 1973. The grasses of southeast Queensland. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Horst, J. P., and H. A. Kamp. 1974. Sports turf research in the Netherlands.The Journal of Sports and The Turf Research Institute 50:81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, B. E., and J. W. Marr. 1970. Effects of human activities on alpine tundra ecosystems in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado.Biological Conservation 2:267–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngner, V. B. 1961. Accelerated wear tests on turfgrasses.Agronomy Journal 53:217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, D., Liddle, M.J. Plant morphological characteristics and resistance to simulated trampling. Environmental Management 17, 511–521 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394666

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394666

Key words

Navigation