Abstract
In response to continued public concern sparked by the loss of open space and greenbelts around American cities, greenways have gained nationwide popularity as a land conservation strategy. This study examines the socioeconomic, demographic, and locational characteristics of greenway users. Three hundred twenty users on four trails of the Capital Area Greenway System in Raleigh, North Carolina, were surveyed. The Raleigh system is extensive, providing 43.7 km (27 mi) of trails, thus allowing examination of greenway use in a variety of settings. The survey findings indicated that most patrons were drawn from within an 8.05-km (5-mi) radius of the greenway. The typical Capital Area Greenway user is a white female between the age of 16 and 34 with no children. Socioeconomically, greenway users are employed, well-educated, and have above average incomes. A disproportionate share of greenway visitors belong to an environmental group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Airola, T. M., and D. Wilson. 1982. Recreational benefits of residual open space: A case study of four communities in Northeastern New Jersey.Environmental Management 6(6):471–484.
Espeseth, R. D. 1976. Linear recreation ways.Parks and Recreation 11(2):26–39.
Flink, C. 1989. President, Greenways, Inc., interview 18 April 1989.
Flourney, W. L., Jr. 1982. Capital area greenway, a report to the city council on the benefits, potential, and methodology of establishing a greenway system in Raleigh. Staff Report, Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department, Raleigh, North Carolina. 119 pp.
Furuseth, O. J. 1989. Greenway user characteristics and attitudes: A study of the McAlpine Greenway, Charlotte, North Carolina. Paper at International Conference on Parkways, Greenways, and Riverways. Asheville, North Carolina. 22 September 1989.
Knack, R., and R. Searns. 1990. The paths less traveled.Planning 56(1):6–10.
Hanson, S., and P. Hanson. 1981. The impact of married woman's employment on household travel patterns: A Swedish example.Transportation 10(2):165–183.
Holman, B. 1990. Interview with North Carolina environmental lobbyist. Raleigh, North Carolina. 15 February 1990.
Lea, D. 1990. Greenways move to forefront.Common Ground 2(2):4–5.
Mills, J. 1990. Clearing the path for all of us where trains once ran.Smithsonian 21(1):132–140.
National Planning Data Corporation. 1989. Estimates and projections of (Raleigh) population by age, sex, and race, per capita and average household income and detailed household income distribution. National Planning Data Corporation, Ithaca, New York. 35 pp.
Pas, E. I. 1984. The effects of selected sociodemographic characteristics on daily travel-activity behavior.Environment and Planning A 16(5):571–581.
Report of the President's Commission. 1987. Americans outdoors: The legacy. The Challenge Island Press, Covelo, California. 420 pp.
Schoolmaster, F. A. 1978. Spatial considerations in the planning of urban recreation facilities: A review and empirical example.In J. W. Frazier and B. J. Epstein (eds.), Applied Geography Conference. SUNY-Binghamton, Binghamton, New York.
Zacker, G., J. Bourey, B. Punochar, and Peter Lageway. 1987. Evaluation of the Burke-Gillman Trail's effect on property values and crime. Staff Report, Seattle Engineering Department and Office for Planning, Seattle, Washington, 42 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furuseth, O.J., Altman, R.E. Who's on the greenway: Socioeconomic, demographic, and locational characteristics of greenway users. Environmental Management 15, 329–336 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393879
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393879