Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental assessment of packaging: Sense and sensibility

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The functions of packaging are derived from product requirements, thus for insight into the environmental effects of packaging the actual combination of product and package has to be evaluated along the production and distribution system. This extension to all related environmental aspects adds realism to the environmental analysis and provides guidance for design while preventing a too detailed investigation of parts of the production system. This approach is contrary to current environmental studies where packaging is always treated as an independent object, neglecting the more important environmental effects of the product that are influenced by packaging.

The general analysis and quantification stages for this approach are described, and the currently available methods for the assessment of environmental effects are reviewed. To limit the workload involved in an environmental assessment, a step-by-step analysis and the use of feedback is recommended. First the dominant environmental effects of a particular product and its production and distribution are estimated. Then, on the basis of these preliminary results, the appropriate system boundaries are chosen and the need for further or more detailed environmental analysis is determined. For typical food and drink applications, the effect of different system boundaries on the outcome of environmental assessments and the advantage of the step-by-step analysis of the food supply system is shown. It appears that, depending on the consumer group, different advice for reduction of environmental effects has to be given. Furthermore, because of interrelated environmental effects of the food supply system, the continuing quest for more detailed and accurate analysis of the package components is not necessary for improved management of the environmental effects of packaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ahbe, S., A. Braunschweig, and R. Müller-Wenk. 1990. Mcthodik für Oekobilanzen (in German). Schriftenreihe nr 133, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft. Bern, 39 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1984. Oekobilanzen von Packstoffen (in German or French). Schriftenreihe nr 24, Bundesamt für Umweltschutz (BUS). Bern, 79 pp.

  • Anon. 1987. Produktlinienanalyse, Bedürfnisse, Produkte und ihre Folge (in German). Projektgruppe Oekologische Wirtschaft. Kölner Volksblatt Verlag, Köln, 180 pp.

  • Anon. 1991. Packaging an environmental perspective. Report by Landbank Environmental Consultancy for Gateway Foodmarkets Ltd., Bristol, UK, 202 pp.

  • Bojkow, E. 1991. Basic considerations on the calculation of the trippage number for returnable containers.Packaging Technology and Science 4:315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boustead, I., and G. F. Hancock. 1989. Incpen study, EEC directive 85/339, UK data 1986, volume 1. Report Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, 166 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava, J. A., and others (eds.). 1990. A technical framework for life-cycle assessments. Workshop report Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vermont meeting. Washington, DC, 134 pp.

  • Franklin, W. E. and others. 1990. Comparative energy and environmental analysis of three interior packing materials. Report, Franklin Associates Ltd., —., Kansas, 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, P. 1991. Oeko-Wettkampf der Lebensmittelverpackungen (in German).Neue Verpackung 44 (4):70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersatter, K. 1991. Oekobilanzen für Packstoffen, Stand 1990 (in German). Schriftenreihe nr 132, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bern, 262 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerop van Eijs, F. G. 1990. Comparison of Tetra Brik and Tetra Rex packages (in Dutch). CPM/TNO organization, report 90.1199. Delft, 14 pp.

  • Kooijman, J. M., K. van Herk, M. Reuvers-Rijnders, A. P. R. van Seters, and G. C. J. Smink. 1991/1992. Life-cycle analysis of packaging (in Dutch).Voedingsmiddelentechnologie 22 (23);35–38: 22(24):18–21; 22(25):37–40; 22(26):37–40; 23(1):31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm, M. P., and G. Sundström. 1986. Tetra Brik Environmental Profile. Report Tetrapak, Malmö, 206 pp.

  • Mekel, O. C. L., and G. Huppes. 1990. Environmental aspects of different package systems for fresh milk. Centrum voor Milieustudies, report nr 70. Leiden, 104 pp.

  • Olabode, A. H. 1977. Total energy to produce food servings as a function of processing and marketing mode.Journal of Food Science 42:768–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehkugler, G. E. 1981. Dietary goals and energy demands for the food system.Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24:1381–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsdorp, I., J. Guinée, and G. Huppes. 1989. Environmental effects of household packages (in Dutch). Centrum voor Milieustudies, report nr 59. Leiden, 135 pp.

  • Singh, R. P. 1986. Energy in food processing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 375 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kooijman, J.M. Environmental assessment of packaging: Sense and sensibility. Environmental Management 17, 575–586 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393720

Key words

Navigation