Abstract
This paper analyzes patterns of naming in the practices of research scientists who work with laboratory animals. The study is based on field work done in 23 biomedical and behavioral research laboratories over a period of nearly three years, as part of a broader investigation into the meaning of laboratory animals for contemporary scientists. Naming is viewed as a social practice that creates meaning of a particular kind, that of narrative coherence, which forms the essence of biography. Since laboratory animals are rarely given proper names, they provide a negative case that illuminates the significance of naming by showing what is entailed by its absence. I argue that the organization of scientific research creates conditions that foster the social construction of a distinct category of animal, the “laboratory animal,” that contrasts with nameable animals (e.g., pets) across every salient dimension. By virtue of this social construct, which is created and supported by naming practices as well as by other aspects of laboratory talk, the cat or dog in the laboratory is perceived by researchers as ontologically different from the pet dog or cat at home.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allerton, D. J., 1987. “The Linguistic and Sociolinguistic Status of Proper Names.”J of Pragmatics 11, 1 (Feb.):61–92.
Ariès, Philippe, 1981.The Hour of Our Death. Tr. by Helen Weaver. New York: Alfred B. Knopf.
Arluke, Arnold B., 1991. “Going Into the Closet With Science: Information Control Among Animal Experimenters.“J of Contemporary Ethnography 20, 3 (Oct.):306–330.
-- 1990. “Uneasiness Among Laboratory Technicians.”Lab Animal (May/June).
——, 1988. “Sacrificial Symbolism in Animal Experimentation: Object or Pet?”Anthrozoös 2, 2 (Oct. 5):97–116.
Bercoff, Ruth Perez, 1987. Letter.The Sciences 27, 4 (July/Aug.):11.
Browne, Malcolm W., 1985. “After 16 Years, Monkeys Are Back in Space.”New York Times (April 30):C9.
Davies, Nigel, 1981.Human Sacrifice in History and Today. New York: William Morrow.
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E., 1956.Nuer Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Michael Mulkay, 1984.Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
Green, Georgia M., 1989.Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hubert, Henri, and Marcel Mauss, 1964.Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function. Tr. by W. D. Halls. Chicago: U of Chicago Press. [orig. pub. 1898 inL'Année Sociologique].
Jasper, James M., and Dorothy Nelkin, 1991.Animal Crusades. New York: Free Press.
Johnson, Wayne, 1987. Letter.The Sciences 27, 4 (July/Aug.):11.
Kakutani, Michiko, 1989. “In the English Gulag.” Review ofIncline Our Hearts by A. N. Wilson.New York Times, Jan. 10.
Kanigel, Robert, 1987. “Specimen No. 1913: A Rat's Brief Life in the Service of Science.”The Sciences 27, 1 (Jan./Feb.):30–37.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D., 1981.The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Steven Woolgar, 1979.Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Leach, Edmund. 1970a. “Brian Twister.” In E. Nelson Hayes and Tanya Hayes, eds.,Claude Lévi-Strauss: The Anthropologist As Hero. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press, pp. 123–132.
Leach, Edmund, 1970b.Claude Lévi-Strauss. New York: Viking Press.
Lederer, Susan E. 1992. “Political Animals: The Shaping of Biomedical Research Literature in Twentieth-Century America.”Isis 83:61–79.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 1966.The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lynch, Michael, 1988. “Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object: Laboratory Culture and Ritual Practice in the Neurosciences.”Soc. Stud. Sci. 18, 2 (May):265–289.
——, 1985.Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Maybury-Lewis, David, 1970. “Science by Association.” In E. Nelson Hayes and Tanya Hayes, eds.,Claude Lévi-Strauss: The Anthropologist As Hero. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press, pp. 133–139.
McKinlay, Andrew, and Jonathan Potter, 1987. “Model Discourse: Interpretative Repertoires in Scientists' Conference Talk.”Soc. Stud. Sci. 17, 3 (Aug.):443–463.
“Monkey on Space Flight in 1959 Dies at 27,” 1984.New York Times, Nov. 30.
Phillips, Mary T., 1991.Constructing Laboratory Animals: An Ethnographic Study in the Sociology of Science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Rollin, Bernard E., 1990.The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain and Science. Oxford: Oxford U Press.
Rowsell, H. C., 1990. “Euthanasia: Acceptable and Unacceptable Methods of Killing.” In Bernard E. Rollin and M. Lynne Kesel, eds.,The Experimental Animal in Biomedical Research. Vol. 1. A Survey of Scientific and Ethical Issues for Investigators. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 381–391.
Searle, John R., 1971. “Proper Names.” In Jay F. Rosenberg and Charles Travis, eds.,Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 212–218.
Sperling, Susan, 1988.Animal Liberators: Research and Morality. Berkeley: U of California Press.
Strawson, P. F., 1971. “On Referring.” In Jay F. Rosenberg and Charles Travis, eds.,Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 175–195.
Terrace, Herbert S., 1979.Nim: A Chimpanzee Who Learned Sign Language. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
United Action for Animals (UAA), n.d. [c. summer, 1982]. “How ‘Unity’ Imperils Laboratory Animals on Earth and in Space.”UAA Newsletter.
-- n.d. [c. Jan., 1983]. “Stop Animal Suffering and Fear on Spacelab.” UAA pamphlet.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1965.The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper & Row. [1st ed. 1958].
——, 1958.Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. German and English text, English tr. by G.E.M. Anscomb. New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phillips, M.T. Proper names and the social construction of biography: The negative case of laboratory animals. Qual Sociol 17, 119–142 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393497
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393497