Skip to main content
Log in

Constitutional renegotiation: Impediments to consensual revision

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a post-constitutional context, restructuring of constitutional rights often fundamentally alters the role and scope of government. It is therefore important to assess the extent to which consensuality is likely to characterize the process of constitutional revision. This article provides theoretical and empirical grounds for concluding that nonconsensual constitutional revision is often the rule rather than the exception. The endogeneity of politically relevant transaction costs and their manipulation by self-interested political actors in a post-constitutional environment are central to the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. and Cukierman, A. (1990) “The Politics of Ambiguity.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105: 829–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. D. (1990)The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1990) “Information Transmission in Debate.”American Journal of Political Science 34: 124–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. and Riker, W.H. (1987) “Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation.”American Political Science Review 81: 897–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. and Riker, W.H. (1990) “Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation: A Correction.”American Political Science Review 84: 243–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J., Taylor, S., and Van Gaalen, R. (1985) “Bureaucratic Expertise Versus Legislative Authority: A Model of Deception and Monitoring in Budgeting.”American Political Science Review 79: 1041–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J., Taylor, S., and Van Gaalen, R. (1987) “Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Asymmetric Information.”American Journal of Political Science 31: 796–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso, C.J. (1987)Pesticides and Politics: The Life Cycle of a Public Issue. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1959) “Positive Economics, Welfare Economics, and Political Economy.”Journal of Law and Economics 2: 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1967)Public Finance in Democratic Process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975)The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1986) “Rights, Efficiency, and Exchange: The Irrelevance of Transactions Cost.” In: Buchanan, J.M.Liberty, Market and State: Political Economy in the 1980s. Washington Square, New York: New York University Press: 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962)The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M.A. and Rowley, C.K. (1988) “Toward a Public Choice Theory of Monopoly Regulation.”Public Choice 57: 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M.A. and Twight, C. (1990) “On the Efficiency of Law: A Public Choice Perspective.”Public Choice 66: 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, R. (1989)Voter Registration and Turnout: 1948–1988. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Library of Congress: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.”Journal of Political Economy 65: 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, T.H. (1986) “Agenda Control, Organizational Structure, and Bureaucratic Politics.”American Journal of Political Science 30: 379–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1987)Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1988) “Can the Constitution Protect Private Rights During National Emergencies?” In: J.D. Gwartney and R.E. Wagner (eds)Public Choice and Constitutional Economics. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press Inc.: 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1990) “Rational Man and All the Rest.”Liberty 4: 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1987a) “Chameleon Voters and Public Choice.”Public Choice 53: 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1987b) “Preference Falsification, Policy Continuity and Collective Conservatism.”Economic Journal 97: 642–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1989) “Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution.”Public Choice 61: 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C.M. (1976) “Pork Barrel Politics and the ‘Fog’ Factor.” Manuscript. University of California at Los Angeles: Arizona State University.

  • Lott, J. (1990) “An Explanation for Public Provision of Schooling: The Importance of Indoctrination.”Journal of Law & Economics 33: 199–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J.R. (1988) “Transaction Costs and the Normative Elements of the Public Choice Model: An Application to Constitutional Theory.”Virginia Law Review 74: 471–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T.M. (1980)The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Midway Reprint edition, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, E.A. (1981)On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965)The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982)The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M. (1981) “Bureaucratic Incentives, Social Efficiency, and the Conflict in Federal Land Policy.”Cato Journal 1: 585–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. (1972)Economic Analysis of Law. 2nd Ed. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971)A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1984) “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions.”American Journal of Political Science 28: 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1987) “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.”American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeck, J. (1952)East of Eden. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M.E. (1987) “Economic Order and Public Policy—Market, Constitution and the Welfare State.” In: R. Pethig and U. Schlieper (eds)Efficiency, Institutions, and Economic Policy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967) “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft.”Western Economic Journal 5: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987) “TheCalculus: Postscript After 25 Years.”Cato Journal 7: 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C.A.L. (1983)Government Manipulation of Constitutional-Level Transaction Costs: An Economic Theory and Its Application to Off-Budget Expenditure Through the Federal Financing Bank. Doctoral dissertation. Seattle: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C. (1988) “Government Manipulation of Constitutional-Level Transaction Costs: A General Theory of Transaction-Cost Augmentation and the Growth of Government.”Public Choice 56: 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C. (1989a) “Institutional Underpinnings of Parochialism: The Case of Military Base Closures.”Cato Journal 9: 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C. (1989b) “The Political Economy of the National Defense Stockpile.”Policy Studies Review 8: 774–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C. (1991) “From Claiming Credit to Avoiding Blame: The Evolution of Congressional Strategy for Asbestos Management.”Journal of Public Policy 11: 153–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C. (1992) “Political Transaction-Cost Manipulation: An Integrating Theory.” Forthcoming.

  • Weaver, R.K. (1986) “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.”Journal of Public Policy 6: 371–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R. (1981) “Regulation, Reregulation, and Deregulation: The Political Foundations of Agency Clientele Relationships.”Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R. and Marshall, W.J. (1988) “The Industrial Organization of Congress; Or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.”Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R., Shepsle, K.A., and Johnsen, C. (1981) “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.”Journal of Political Economy 89: 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, E.G. and Winer, S.L. (1980) “Optimal Fiscal Illusion and the Size of Government.”Public Choice 35: 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1989)Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. (1990) “Principles of Political Economy: An Outline Proposal, Illustrated by Application to Fiscal Federalism.”Constitutional Political Economy 1: 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. A. (1991/1988) “Tectonic Policies and Political Competition.” In: A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, and R. Wintrobe (eds)The Competitive State: Villa Colombella Papers on Competitive Politics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Robert Higgs and this journal's referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Twight, C. Constitutional renegotiation: Impediments to consensual revision. Constit Polit Econ 3, 89–112 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393234

Keywords

Navigation