Skip to main content
Log in

Partial hyperbolicity and robust transitivity

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bonatti, Ch., Seminar, IMPA, 1996.

  2. Bonatti, Ch. &Díaz, L. J., Persistence of transitive diffeomorphisms.Ann. of Math., 143 (1995), 367–396.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —, Connexions hétérocliniques et généricité d’une infinité de puits ou de sources.Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 32 (1999), 135–150.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonatti, Ch. & Viana, M., SRB measures for partially hyperbolic atractors: the contracting case. To appear inIsrael J. Math.

  5. Carvalho, M., Sinai-Ruelle-Bowen measures forN-dimensional derived from Anosov diffeomorphisms.Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems, 13 (1993), 21–44.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Camacho, C. &Lins Neto, A.,Geometric Theory of Foliations, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Díaz, L. J., Robust nonhyperbolic dynamics at heterodimensional cycles.Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems, 15 (1995), 291–315.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. —, Persistence of cycles and nonhyperbolic dynamics at heteroclinic bifurcations.Nonlinearity, 8 (1995), 693–715.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Doering, C. I., Persistently transitive vector fields on three-dimensional manifolds, inDynamical Systems and Bifurcation Theory (Rio de Janeiro, 1985), pp. 59–89. Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., 160, Longman Sci. Tech., Harlow, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Díaz, L. J. &Rocha, J., Noncritical saddle-node cycles and robust nonhyperbolic dynamics.Dynamics Stability Systems, 12 (1997), 109–135.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Díaz, L. J. &Ures, R., Persistent homoclinic tangencies and the unfolding of cycles.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 11 (1994), 643–659.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Franks, J., Necessary conditions for the stability of diffeomorphisms.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 158 (1971), 301–308.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Grayson, M., Pugh, C. &Shub, M., Stably ergodic diffeomorphisms.Ann. of Math., 140 (1994), 295–329.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi, S., Connecting invariant manifolds and the solution of theC 1-stability and Ω-stability conjectures for flows.Ann. of Math., 145 (1997), 81–137.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirsch, M., Pugh, C. &Shub, M.,Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math., 583. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mañé, R., Contributions to the stability conjecture.Topology, 17 (1978), 386–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. —, Persistent manifolds are normally hyperbolic.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 246 (1978). 261–283.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. —, An ergodic closing lemma.Ann. of Math., 116 (1982), 541–558.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. —, A proof of theC 1 stability conjecture.Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 66 (1988), 161–210.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Morales, C., Pacífico, M. J. &Pujals, E. R., OnC 1 robust singular transitive sets for three-dimensional flows.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 326 (1998), 81–86.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Newhouse, S., Codimension one Anosov diffeomorphisms.Amer. J. Math., 92 (1970), 761–770.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Pugh, C., The closing lemma.Amer. J. Math., 89 (1967), 956–1009.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Palis, J. &Viana, M., High-dimensional diffeomorphisms displaying infinitely many sinks.Ann. of Math., 140 (1994), 207–250.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Romero, N., Persistence of homoclinic tangencies in higher dimension.Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems, 15 (1995), 735–759.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Shub, M., Topologically transitive diffeomorphism ofT 4, inSymposium on Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (University of Warwick, 1968/69), pp. 39–40. Lecture Notes in Math., 206. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smale, S., Differentiable dynamical systems.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 73 (1967), 147–817.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams, R. F., The “DA” maps of Smale and structural stability, inGlobal Analysis (Berkeley, CA, 1968), pp. 329–334. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 14. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work is partially supported by CNPq, PRONEX-Dynamical Systems and FAPERJ (Brazil), and CSIC and CONICYT (Uruguay).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Díaz, L.J., Pujals, E.R. & Ures, R. Partial hyperbolicity and robust transitivity. Acta Math 183, 1–43 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392945

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392945

Keywords

Navigation