Skip to main content
Log in

Complex geometry of convex domains that cover varieties

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Baily, W., On the quotient of an analytic manifold by a group of analytic homeomorphisms.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 40 (1954), 804–808.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cartan, H., Quotient d'un espace analytique par une groupe d'automorphismes, inAlgebraic Geometry and Topology, a Symposium in honor of Solomon Lefschetz, pp. 90–102. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1957; see alsoSeminaire H. Cartan, 1952–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, S. &Yau, S. T., On the existence of a complete Kähler metric.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980), 507–544.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fornaess, J. E. &Sibony, N., Increasing sequences of complex manifolds.Math. Ann., 255 (1981), 351–360.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankel, S., Stanford thesis, 1985.

  6. Frankel, S., Affine approach to complex geometry. To appear inContemporary Mathematics, Proceedings of November 1987AMS Meeting on Differential Geometry in Los Angeles. Ed. S. Y. Cheng and R. E. Greene.

  7. Goldman, W., Convex real projective structures on compact surfaces. Preprint.

  8. Greene, R., Private communication.

  9. Gromov, M., Lafontaine, J &Pansu, P.,Structures Metriques sur les Varietes Riemannienes. Cedic/Fernand Nathan, Paris, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hano, J. L., On Kählerian homogeneous spaces of unimodular Lie groups.Amer J. Math., 79 (1957) 885–900.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayman, W. K.,Multivalent Functions. Cambridge Tracts, 48. Cambridge University Press, 1958.

  12. Helgason, S.,Differential Geometry and Symmetric Spaces orDifferential Geometry, Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces. Acad. Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hochschild, G.,The Structure of Lie Groups. (Holden-Day) San Francisco, 1965.

  14. Iwasawa, K., On some types of topological groups.Ann of Math (2), 50 (1949), 507–558.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson, N.,Lie Algebras. Interscience tracts no. 10, John Wiley, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Katz, V. &Vinberg, E. B., Quasi-homogeneous cones.Mat. Zametki=Math. Notes, 1 (1967), 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kobayashi, S.,Hyperbolic Manifolds and Holomorphic Mappings. M. Dekker, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. —, Geometry of bounded domains.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 92 (1959), 267–290.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi, S. &Chu, H., The automorphism group of a geometric structure.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 113 (1964), 141–150.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodaira, K., On Kähler varieties of restricted type.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 40 (1954) 313–316; see alsoAnn. of Math. 60 (1954), 28–48.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. —, A certain type of irregular algebraic surfaces.J. Analyse Math., 19 (1967), 207–215.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kodaira, K. & Morrow, J.,Complex Manifolds. Holt-Rhinehart-Winston, 1971.

  23. Kohn J. &Nirenberg, L., A pseudoconvex domain not admitting a holomorphic support function.Math. Ann., 201 (1973), 265–268.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Milnor, J.,Characteristic Classes. Ann. of Math. Stud., 76. Princeton University Press, 1974.

  25. Mostow, G. D. &Siu, Y. T., A compact Kähler surface of negative curvature not covered by the ball,Ann. of Math. (2), 112 (1980), 321–360.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mok, N. & Yau, S. T., Completeness of the Kähler-Einstein metric on bounded domains and the characterization of domains of holomorphy by curvature conditions, inSymposia in Pure Math. The Mathematical Heritage of Henri Poincaré, vol. 39, part 1, 1983, AMS, pp. 41–60.

  27. Montgomery, D. & Zippin, L.,Topological Transformation Groups. Interscience tracts in Pure and Appl. Math. no. 1, 1955.

  28. Mosher, R. &Tangora, M.,Cohomology Operations in Homotopy Theory. New York Harper and Row New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Myers, S. B. & Steenrod, N., The group of isometries of a Riemannian manifold.

  30. Piiatetskii-Shapiro, I. I.,Automorphic Functions and the Geometry of Classical Domains. (English translation) Gordon Breach, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raghunathan, M.,Discrete subgroups of Lie Groups. Springer, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vey, J., Sur la division des domaines de Siegel.Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 3 (1970), 479–506.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wells, R., Deformations of strongly pseudoconvex domains inC n, inSymposia in Pure Math., 30, part 2 (1977), pp. 125–128.

  34. Wong, B., Characterisation of the ball by its automorphism group.Invent. Math., 41 (1977), 253–257.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. — The uniformization of compact Kähler surfaces of negative curvature.J. Differential Geom., 16 (1981), 407–420.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Yau, S. T., Nonlinear analysis in geometry.Enseign. Math. (2), 38 (1987), 109–158.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zimmer, R. J.,Ergodic Theory and Semi-Simple Lie Groups. Birkhäuser, 1984.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frankel, S. Complex geometry of convex domains that cover varieties. Acta Math. 163, 109–149 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392734

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392734

Keywords

Navigation