Skip to main content
Log in

Representation theoretic rigidity in PSL (2,R)

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Agard, S., A geometric proof of Mostow's rigidity theorem for groups of divergence type.Acta Math., 151 (1983), 231–252.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alhfors, L. V.,Conformal Invariants, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beardon, A. F., Inequalities for certain Fuchsian groups.Acta. Math., 127 (1971), 221–258.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. —,The Geometry of Discrete Groups. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Carleson, L.,Selected Problems on Exceptional Sets. Van Nostrand, 1967.

  6. Cowling, M. &Steger, T., Irreducbility of restrictions of unitary representations to lattices,J. Reine Angew. Math., 420 (1991), 85–98.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dehn, M.,Papers on Group Theory and Topology. Translated by John Stillwell. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Figà-Talamanca, A. &Nebbia, C.,Harmonic Analysis and Representation Theory for Groups Acting on Homogeneous Trees. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 162. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman, F., de la Harpe, P. &Jones, V.,Coxeter Graphs and Towers of Algebras. MSRI Publications, 14. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Keen, L., Canonical polygons for finitely generated Fuchsian groups.Acta. Math., 115 (1966), 1–16.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Knapp, A. W.,Representation Theory of Semisimple Groups. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhn, G. & Steger, T., Restrictions of the special representation of Aut (Tree3) to two cocompact subgroups. To appear inRocky Mountain J. Math.

  13. Kuusalo, T., Boundary mappings of geometric isomorphisms of Fuchsian groups.Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I, 545 (1973), 1–6.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lang, S.,SL 2(R). Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lyndon, R. C. &Schupp, P. E.,Combinatorial Group Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Margulis, G. A., Non-uniform lattices in semisimple algebraic groups, inLie Groups and Their Representations (I.M. Gelfand, ed.), Wiley, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. —, Discrete subgroups of motions of manifolds of non-positive curvature.Amer. Math. Soc. Transl., 109 (1977), 33–45.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mostow, G. D., Quasiconformal mappings inn-space and the rigidity of hyperbolic space forms.Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 34 (1968), 53–104.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. —,Strong Rigidity of Locally Symmetric Spaces. Ann. of Math. Studies, 78. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen, J., Die Isomorphismengruppe der freien Gruppen.Math. Ann, 91 (1924), 169–209.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. —, Untersuchen zur Topologie der geschlossenen zweiseitigen Flächen, I, II, III.Acta Math., 50 (1927), 189–358; 53 (1929), 1–76; 58 (1932), 87–167.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Patterson, S. J., The limit set of a Fuchsian group.Acta. Math., 136 (1976), 241–273.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Pensavalle, C., Spherical series and generators of a free group. Preprint, Università di Sassari, 1992.

  24. Prasad, G., Strong rigidity of Q-rank 1 lattices.Invent. Math., 21 (1973), 255–286.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Rachunathan, M. S.,Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Selberg, A., On discontinuous groups in higher-dimensional spaces, inContributions to Function Theory. Tata Institute, Bombay, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Series, C., The infinite word problem and limit sets in Fuchsian groups.Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems, 1 (1981), 337–360.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Stein, E. M.,Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sullivan, D., The density at infinity of a discrete group of hyperbolic motions.Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 50 (1979), 171–202.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Tukia, P., A rigidity theorem for Möbius groups.Invent. Math., 97 (1989), 405–431.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. —, Hausdorff dimension and quasisymmetric mappings.Math. Scand., 65 (1989), 152–160.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmer, R. J., Strong rigidity for ergodic actions of semisimple Lie groups.Ann. of Math., 112 (1980), 511–529.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. —, Argodic theory, group representations and rigidity.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 6 (1982), 383–416.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Both authors are partially supported by the NSF

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, C., Steger, T. Representation theoretic rigidity in PSL (2,R). Acta Math. 170, 121–149 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392456

Navigation