Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous measurements of radon and radon progeny as a basis for management of radon as a hazard in a tourist cave

  • Radium and Radon Measurement
  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A six month survey of radon, radon progeny and condensation nuclei (CN) has been conducted in an Australian tourist cave. The measurements have been made continuously at two sites within the cave: one a small chamber with a high air exchange rate close to one entrance and connected to several other entrances by complex passages; the other a large chamber with a low air exchange rate 1 km from the nearest entrance. The measurements form a basis for evaluation of the accuracy with which dose due to radon can be determined for different monitoring strategies. It is shown that the estimate of dose based on the measurement of radon concentration and recommendations in ICPR-65, is low by a factor of 1.3 at the well ventilated site and 1.5 at the site with a low air exchange rate and low CN. At each site the weekly average equilibrium factor and unattached fraction were steady, leading to the possibility of establishing a cave system average of these factors. However, given the technical diffuculties involved, it may not be practicable to make enough unattached fraction measurements to fully represent the cave system. Therefore it may be necessary to use a conservative approach to the dosimetry and add 50% to values determined by the ICRP-65 conversion convention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Hakl, I. Hunyadi, A. Varhegyi, in: Radon measurements by etched track detectors,R. Iric andS. A. Darrawi (Eds), World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. J. Butterweck, J. Porstendorfer, A. Reineking, J. Keston, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 45 (1992) 167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. S. Cheng, T. R. Chen, P. T. Wasiolek, A. Vanengen, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 26 (1997) 74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. B. Solomon R. Langroo, J. R. Peggie, R. G. Lyons, J. M. James, Australian Radiation Laboratory, Australia, Tech. Report ARL/TR 119, 1996.

  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 65, Protection against Radon-222 at Home and at Work, Annals, of the ICPR 23, 1994.

  6. S. B. Solomon, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., in press.

  7. S. B. Solomon, M. B. Cooper, R. S. Obrien, L. Wilkenson, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 45 (1992) 171.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. W. Pollak, A. L. Metnieks, School of Cosmic Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin, Ireland, Tech. Note 9, 1960.

  9. J. L. Gras, J. Aerosol Sci., 15 (1984) 523.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahorowski, W., Whittlestone, S. & James, J.M. Continuous measurements of radon and radon progeny as a basis for management of radon as a hazard in a tourist cave. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 236, 219–225 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02386346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02386346

Keywords

Navigation