Abstract
Despite apparently inadequate N levels throughout the Inland Northwest of the United States, trees on some sites showed no increased growth 6 yr after N fertilization. Nor did higher N application rates consistently produce higher response. These facts indicated that other factors are limiting tree growth at these sites. Results suggest that K status is one important factor, influencing N fertilization response in the following general ways: (1) for stands with low pretreatment foliar K levels, the amount and duration of growth response are reduced, and higher N fertilizer rates produce less response; and (2) for all stands, growth response declines when foliar K decreases after N fertilization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black, C.A. (ed.): 1965,Methods of soil analysis: Part II, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Blanchar, R.W., Rehm, G. and Caldwell, A.C.: 1965,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29, 71.
Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S.: 1982, pp. 595–624 in A.L. Page (ed)Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Agronomy 9, Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin.
Daubenmire, R. and Daubenmire, J.B.: 1968,Forest Vegetation of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho, Wash. Agri. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 60, Washington State Univ., Pullman, pp. 5–6.
Federer, W.T.: 1955,Experimental Design: Theory and Application, The Macmillan Co., New York, pp. 495–497.
Franklin, J.F. and Dyrness, C.T.: 1973,Natural Vegetation of Washington and Oregon, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-8, Pac. Northwest For. and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon, pp. 5–43.
Haig, I.T., Davis, K.P. and Weidman, R.H.: 1941, "Natural regeneration in the western white pine type," USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 767, Washington, D.C., 99 pp.
Ingestad, T.: 1967, "Methods for uniform optimum fertilization of forest tree plants," Proc. 14th IUFRO Congr.3, pp. 265–269.
Ingestad, T.: 1979,Physiol. Plant 45, 373.
Jarrel, W.M. and Beverly, R.B.: 1981, pp. 147–224 in N.C. Brady (ed)Advances in Agronomy 34, Academic Press, New York.
Monserud, R.A.: 1984,For. Sci. 30, 943.
Moore, J.A., Mika, P.G. and Vander Ploeg, J.: 1989, "Intermountain Forest Tree Nutrition Cooperative 9th Annual Report," College of FWR, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, 44 p.
SAS Institute, Inc.: 1985,SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, pp. 433–506.
Sommers, L.E. and Nelson, D.W.: 1972,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 902.
US-EPA: 1979,Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio.
van den Driessche, R.: 1979, pp. 214–220 in S.P. Gessel, R.M. Kenady and W.A. Atkinson (eds)Proc., Forest Fertilization Conference, Institute of Forest Resources Contribution No. 40, University of Washington, Seattle.
Webster, S.R. and Dobkowski, A.: 1983, "Concentrations of foliar nutrients for trees and the dosage and frequency of fertilizer trials," Weyerhaeuser Research Report No. 1, Project 050-3920/3.
Wykoff, W.R., Crookston, N.L. and Stage, A.R.: 1982, "User's Guide to
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mika, P.G., Moore, J.A. Foliar potassium status explains douglas fir response to nitrogen fertilization in the Inland Northwest, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut 54, 477–491 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385240
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385240