Abstract
In February, 1972, a troop of 150 Japanese macaques was tranplanted from Kyoto, Japan, to Laredo, Texas, USA, after 20 years of study in Japan. As part of the general adaptation of the troop to its new environment, spacing behavior was observed in the central adult males [by independent rank, (1)Dai, (2)W, (3)Bus 62, and (4)Kojiwa 59]. Spot checks of locations, vertical space use, mobility patterns, and paths to and from a box of apples suggested that the major influences on spacing were rank, personality and history, social interactions, and several environmental factors (availability of vertical space, water, and shade, extreme heat, daily provisioning, etc).Dai exceeded the other males in use of vertical space, rate and distance of travel, and proximity to the apple box.W confined his high use of vertical space use primarily to one structure. His distance and rate of travel were low, and he maintained the greatest distance from the apple box.Bus 62 ranked second in use of vertical space, distance and rate of travel, and proximity to the apple box.Kojiwa 59 frequently changed sites in his use of vertical space. His distance and rate of travel were low, and he maintained long distances from the apple box.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, J. D. &J. I. Baldwin., 1974. The dynamics of interpersonal spacing in monkeys and man.Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 44: 790–806.
Clark, T. W., 1975. Transplantation and adaptation of a troop of Japanese macaques to a Texas brushland habitat.Submitted to Milwaukee Public Mus. Monogr. Series, 415 p.
Demment, M. W., 1974. Feeding ecology of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) in South Texas. M. S. Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin,
DeVore, I. &K. L. R. Hall, 1965. Baboon ecology. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston Inc., New York, pp. 20–52.
Hall, K. L. R., 1964. Aggression in monkey and ape societies. In:The Natural History of Aggression,J. D. Carthy &F. J. Ebling (eds.), Academic Press, New York, p. 159.
Imanishi, K., 1957. Identification a process of enculturation in the subhuman society ofMacaca fuscata.Primates, 1: 1–29.
Itani, J., 1954. Japanese monkeys in Takasakiyama. In:Nihon-Dobutsuki,K. Imanishi (ed.),II. Kobun-sha, Tokyo, 284 p.
Kawai, M., 1965. Newly-acquired precultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima Islet.Primates, 6: 1–30.
Kawamura, S., 1959. The process of subculture propagation among Japanese macaques.Primates, 2: 43–60.
Koyama, N., 1967. On dominance rank and kinship of a wild Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama.Primates, 8: 189–216.
————, 1970. Changes in dominance rank and division of a wild Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama.Primates, 11: 335–390.
Kummer, H., 1971. Spacing mechanisms in social behavior. In:Man and Beast,J. Eisenberg (ed.), Smithsonian Press, Washington, D. C.
Mason, W. A. 1968. Naturalistic and experimental investigations of the social behavior of monkeys and apes. In:Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability,P. Jay (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 200–216.
Rasmussen, D., 1973. Spatial relations among adult male Japanese macaques.Primate News: 11–15.
Rowell, T., 1967. Social organization in primates. In:Primate Ethology,D. Morris (ed.), Aldine, London, pp. 219–235.
Southwick, C. H., 1969. An experimental study of intragroup agonistic behavior in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Behaviour, 28: 182–209.
Yamada, M., 1966. Five natural troops of Japanese monkeys in Shodoshima Island (I): distribution and organization.Primates, 7: 315–362.
————, 1971. Five natural troops of Japanese monkeys in Shodoshima Island (II): a comparison of social structure.Primates, 12: 125–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Casey, D.E., Clark, T.W. Some spacing relations among the central males of a transplanted troop of Japanese macaques (Arashiyama west). Primates 17, 433–450 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382906
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382906