Abstract
In this paper I examine exploratory behavior and learning in two groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus), both living under laboratory conditions. The main aim of my studies was to compare behavior occurring in an experimental testing situation with home-cage behavior, and to assess conditions under which exploration is enhanced. One group of marmosets was tested individually in an experimental room away from a larger animal holding room, and a second group was observed in their own home cages, surrounded by other marmosets. Marmosets in both groups were given the opportunity to learn simple tasks, such as pressing a lever for food or jumping on to a wire grid to open a door and see a neighbouring marmoset, and were provided with sets of novel or familiar objects to encourage play and exploration. In the isolated experimental cage, marmosets which learnt a lever-pressing task showed higher general activity levels than controls; in the home cages the mere addition of novel objects resulted in enhancements in exploratory behavior (measured in terms of contacts with the objects). Although the activities associated with learning tended to decline over time, the novel objects remained a constant interest throughout the experiment. The results have implications for maintaining marmosets in captivity, especially in situations when they are housed separately.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, D. H., 1978. The physical, hormonal and behavioural development of the common marmoset,Callithrix jacchus jacchus. In:Biology and Behaviour of Marmosets,H. Rothe,H. J. Wolters, &J. P. Hearn (eds.), Eigenverlag, Göttingen, pp. 99–106.
Azrin, N. H., R. R. Hutchinson, &D. F. Hake, 1966. Extinction-induced aggression.J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9: 191–204.
Beck, B. B. &M. I. Castro, 1994. Environments for endangered primates. In:Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research,E. F. Gibbons,Jr.,E. J. Wyers,E. Waters, &E. W. Menzel,Jr. (eds.), State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 259–270.
Berlyne, D. E., 1955. The arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 48: 238–246.
Box, H. O., 1978. Social interactions in family groups of captive marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). In:The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae,D. G. Kleiman (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 239–249.
Chamove, A. S., 1989. Environmental enrichment: a review.Anim. Technol., 40: 155–178.
———— &J. R. Anderson, 1989. Examining environmental enrichment. In:Housing, Care and Psychological Wellbeing of Captive and Laboratory Primates,E. F. Segal (ed.), Noyes, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp. 183–202.
Elton, R. H., 1979. Baboon behavior under crowded conditions. In:Captivity and Behavior: Primates in Breeding Colonies, Laboratories, and Zoos,J. Erwin,T. L. Maple, &G. Mitchell (eds.), van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 125–138.
Epple, G., 1968. Comparative studies on vocalization in marmoset monkeys (Hapalidae).Folia Primatol., 8: 1–40.
————, 1970. Maintenance, breeding, and development of marmoset monkeys (Callitrichidae) in captivity.Folia Primatol., 12: 56–76.
File, S. E., 1978. Exploration, distraction, and habituation in rats reared in isolation.Develop. Psychobiol., 11: 73–81.
Forster, F. C., 1986. The effects of extinction on exploratory behaviour in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Honours thesis, Univ. of Adelaide, South Australia.
————, 1990. Exploratory behaviour in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) under conditions of varying object novelty and training procedures. Presented at Australian Primate Society 9th Annual Scientific Meeting, December, Adelaide; see also 1991,Australian Primatol., 6: 8–9.
————, 1992. Exploration in the rat and the marmoset: relationships between learning and object novelty in an open field. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Adelaide, South Australia.
Foshee, D. P., C. J. Vierck, Jr., G. W. Meier, &C. Federspiel, 1965. Simultaneous measure of general activity and exploratory behavior.Percep. Motor Skills, 20: 445–451.
Fragaszy, D. M., 1979. Titi and squirrel monkeys in a novel environment. In:Captivity and Behavior: Primates in Breeding Colonies, Laboratories, and Zoos,J. Erwin,T. L. Maple, &G. Mitchell (eds.), van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 172–216.
Greenough, W. T., W. E. Wood, &T. C. Madden, 1972. Possible memory storage differences among mice reared in environments varying in complexity.Behav. Biol., 7: 717–722.
Halliday, M. S., 1968. Exploratory behaviour. In:Analysis of Behavioral Change,L. Weiskrantz (ed.), Harper & Row, New York, pp. 107–126.
Hampton, J. K., Jr., S. H. Hampton, &B. T. Landwehr, 1966. Observations of a successful breeding colony of the marmoset,Oedipomidas oedipus.Folia Primatol., 4: 265–287.
Hearn, J. P., S. F. Lunn, F. J. Burden, &M. M. Pilcher, 1975. Management of marmosets for biomedical research.Lab. Anim., 9: 125–134.
Huck, U. W. &E. O. Price, 1975. Differential effects of environmental enrichment on the open-field behavior of wild and domestic Norway rats.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 89: 892–898.
Hughes, R. N., 1969. Social facilitation of locomotion and exploration in rats.Brit. J. Psychol., 60: 385–388.
Ingram, J. C., 1975. Husbandry and observation methods of a breeding colony of marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) for behavioural research.Lab. Anim., 9: 249–259.
Izard, M. K. &M. E. Pereira, 1994. Design of indoor housing for a breeding and research colony of prosimian primates. In:Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research,E. F. Gibbons,Jr.,E. J. Wyers,E. Waters, &E. W. Menzel,Jr. (eds.), State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 111–125.
Janson, C. H., 1994. Naturalistic environments in captivity: a methodological bridge between field and laboratory studies of primates. In:Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research,E. F. Gibbons,Jr.,E. J. Wyers,E. Waters, &E. W. Menzel,Jr. (eds.), State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 271–279.
Kidman, M., 1990. Notes on supplementary feeding and stimulation of common marmosets.Thylacinus, 15: 2–3.
King, J. E. &V. R. Norwood, 1989. Free-environment rooms as alternative housing for squirrel monkeys. In:Housing, Care and Psychological Wellbeing of Captive and Laboratory Primates,E. F. Segal (ed.), Noyes, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp. 102–114.
Kingston, W. R., 1969. Marmosets and tamarins.Lab. Anim. Handbook, 4: 243–250.
Kvist, B., 1983. Open field activity after learning in mice.Scand. J. Psychol., 24: 313–324.
————, 1984. Strain differences in open field activity after learning in mice.Scand. J. Psychol., 25: 370–380.
————, 1986. Open field activity after learning and stress in mice.Scand. J. Psychol., 27: 58–63.
Lacher, T. E., Jr., G. A. B. da Fonseca, C. Alves, &B. Magalhaes-Castro, 1981. Exudate-eating, scent-marking, and territoriality in wild populations of marmosets.Anim. Behav., 29: 306–307.
Lagerspetz, K. Y. H., B. Kvist, &K. M. J. Lagerspetz, 1980. Several types of learning increase open field activity in mice.Scand. J. Psychol., 21: 215–222.
Leyland, M., T. Robbins, &S. D. Iverson, 1976. Locomotor activity and exploration: the use of traditional manipulators to dissociate these two behaviors in the rat.Anim. Learn. Behav., 4: 261–265.
Litchfield, C., 1991. Behavioural enrichment for chimpanzees in Australian zoos. Presented at Australian Primate Society 10th Annual Scientific Meeting. November, Perth.
Loizos, C., 1967. Play behaviour in higher primates: a review. In:Primate Ethology,D. Morris (ed.), Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, pp. 176–218.
Manosevitz, M., 1970. Early environmental enrichment and mouse behavior.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 71: 459–466.
Maple, T. L., 1979. Great apes in captivity: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In:Captivity and Behavior: Primates in Breeding Colonies, Laboratories, and Zoos,J. Erwin,T. L. Maple, &G. Mitchell (eds.), van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 239–272.
Menzel, C. R., 1980. Head-cocking and visual perception in primates.Anim. Behav., 28: 151–159.
Menzel, E. W., Jr. &C. R. Menzel, 1979. Cognitive, developmental and social aspects of responsiveness to novel objects in a family group of marmosets (Saguinus fuscicollis).Behaviour, 70: 251–279.
Millar, S. K., S. Evans, &A. S. Chamove, 1988. Older offspring contact novel objects soonest in Callitrichid families.Biol. Behav., 13: 82–96.
Mineka, S., M. Gunnar, &M. Champoux, 1986. Control and early socioemotional development: infant rhesus monkeys reared in controllable versus uncontrollable environments.Child Develop., 57: 1241–1256.
Molzen, E. M. &J. A. French, 1989. The problem of foraging in captive Callitrichid primates: behavioral time budgets and foraging skills. In:Housing, Care and Psychological Wellbeing of Captive and Laboratory Primates,E. F. Segal (ed.), Noyes, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp. 89–101.
Moser, M., E. I. Moser, B. Wultz, &T. Sagvolden, 1988. Component analyses differentiate between exploratory behaviour of spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar Kyoto rats in a two-compartment free-exploration open field.Scand. J. Psychol., 29: 200–206.
Novak, M. A., P. O’neill, S. A. Beckley, &S. J. Suomi, 1994. Naturalistic environments for captive primates. In:Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research,E. F. Gibbons,Jr.,E. J. Wyers,E. Waters, &E. W. Menzel,Jr. (eds.), State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 236–258.
Poswillo, D. E. &T. Richards, 1972. Maintaining an environment for marmosets in the laboratory.Engineering in Medicine, 1: 86–88.
Renner, M. J., 1988. Learning during exploration: the role of behavioral topography during exploration in determining subsequent adaptive behavior.Int. J. Comp. Psychol., 2: 43–56.
————, 1990. Neglected aspects of exploratory and investigatory behavior.Psychobiology, 18: 16–22.
————,A. J. Bennett, M. L. Ford, &P. J. Pierre, 1992. Investigation of inanimate objects by the greater bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii).Primates, 33: 315–327.
————, ————, &J. C. White, 1992. Age and sex as factors influencing spontaneous exploration and object investigation by preadult rats (Rattus norvegicus).J. Comp. Psychol., 106: 217–227.
———— &M. R. Rosenzweig, 1986. Object interactions in juvenile rats (Rattus norvegicus): effects of different experimental histories.J. Comp. Psychol., 100: 229–236.
———— &C. P. Seltzer, 1991. Molar characteristics of exploratory and investigatory behavior in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).J. Comp. Psychol., 105: 326–339.
Roder, E. L., J. A. Timmermans, &J. M. H. Vossen, 1989. Effects of rearing and exposure condition upon the acquisition of phobic behaviour in cynomolgus monkeys.Behav. Res. Therapy, 27: 221–231.
Rosellini, R. A. &D. R. Widman, 1989. Prior exposure to stress reduces the diversity of exploratory behavior of novel objects in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).J. Comp. Psychol., 103: 339–346.
Rosenzweig, M. R., 1971. Effects of environment on development of brain and behavior. In:The Biopsychology of Development,E. Tobach,L. R. Aronson, &E. Shaw (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 303–342.
Snowdon, C. T., 1994. The significance of naturalistic environments for primate behavioral research. In:Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research,E. F. Gibbons,Jr.,E. J. Wyers,E. Waters, &E. W. Menzel,Jr. (eds.), State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 217–235.
———— &Y. V. Pola, 1978. Responses of pygmy marmosets to synthesized variations of their own vocalizations. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 1,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 811–813.
———— &A. Savage, 1989. Psychological well-being of captive primates: general considerations and examples from Callitrichids. In:Housing, Care and Psychological Wellbeing of Captive and Laboratory Primates,E. F. Segal (ed.), Noyes, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp. 75–88.
———— &P. Soini, 1988. The tamarins, genusSaguinus. In:Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 2,R. A. Mittermeier,A. B. Rylands,A. F. Coimbra-Filho, &G. A. B. da Fonseca (eds.), World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C., pp. 223–298.
Stellar, E., 1960. The marmoset as a laboratory animal: maintenance, general observations of behavior, and simple learning.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 53: 1–10.
Stevenson, M. F., 1978. The ontogeny of playful behaviour in family groups of the common marmoset. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 1,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 139–143.
———— &T. B. Poole, 1976. An ethogram of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus): general behavioural repertoire.Anim. Behav., 24: 428–451.
———— &A. B. Rylands, 1988. The marmosets, genusCallithrix. In:Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 2,R. A. Mittermeier,A. B. Rylands,A. F. Coimbra-Filho, &A. B. da Fonseca (eds.), World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C., pp. 131–222.
Wong, P. T. P., 1977. A behavioral field approach to instrumental learning in the rat: I. Partial reinforcement effects and sex differences.Anim. Learn. Behav., 5: 5–13.
————, 1978. A behavior field approach to instrumental learning in the rat: II. Training parameters and a stage model of extinction.Anim. Learn. Behav., 6: 82–93.
Wyers, E. J., 1994. Comments on behavioral research in naturalistic settings. In:Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research,E. F. Gibbons,Jr.,E. J. Wyers,E. Waters, &E. W. Menzel,Jr. (eds.), State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 19–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, F.C. Exploratory behavior and learning in laboratory marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus): Comparisons between experimental-cage and home-cage activity. Primates 36, 501–514 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382872
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382872