Skip to main content
Log in

A review of attempts to condition operantly alloprimate vocalizations

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A central issue in the study of alloprimate vocalizations concerns the extent of the animal's control over vocalization production. Two competing models are the semanticity model which states that vocalizations contain an environmental referent, and the level-of-arousal model which states that vocalizations are an emotional product of differential internal states of arousal. One source of evidence bearing on this issue is the operant control of vocalizations by alloprimates. This paper presents a comprehensive review of 12 attempts to condition operantly alloprimate vocalizations. These 12 experiments are analyzed in terms of various subject and procedural variables, including the age, species and sex of the subject, and the type of task and reward used. The results of this analysis indicate the following: Primates are able to control their own vocal output with considerable success; species, age and sex variables place no restriction upon this ability. In addition, the appropriateness of the reinforcer influenced the success rate of the experiment. These results are interpreted as supporting evidence for the semanticity model of vocal production. Results are discussed in terms of an “ecologically-appropriate hypothesis.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, P. G. &D. A. Wilson, 1979. Discriminative vocal conditioning in Rhesus monkeys: Evidence for volitional control?Brain and Language, 8: 227–240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, D. J., 1972. The siamang and the gibbon in the Malay Peninsula.Gibbon and Siamang, 1: 103–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E. &C. A. Logan, 1979.The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: A Biological Perspective. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J., L. Clarke &W. Hankins, 1973. Natural responses to scheduled rewards. In:Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 1,P. Bateson &P. Klopfer (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. R. L. &I. DeVore, 1965. Baboon social behavior. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 53–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, M. M., E. G. Maples &S. Tolson, 1981. Taped vocalization as a reinforcer of vocal behavior in a siamang gibbon (Symphalangus syndactylus).Psychol. Reports, 49: 995–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A., 1972. Comments on Part A. In:Non-verbal Communication,R. A. Hinde (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, London, pp. 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. B., 1968. Primate communication systems and the emergence of human language. In:Primates,P. J. Jay (ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 439–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, J. D., M. A. Milan, K. B. Jasper &K. L. Heaton, 1972. Schedule control of the vocal behavior of Cebus monkeys.JEAB, 17: 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leger, D. W., D. H. Owings &D. L. Gelfand, 1980. Single-note vocalizations of California ground squirrels: Graded signals and situation-specificity of predator and socially evoked calls.Z. Tierpsychol., 52: 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maples, E. G. &M. M. Haraway, 1982. Taped vocalization as a reinforcer of vocal behavior in a female agile gibbon.Psychol. Reports, 51: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P., 1959. Developments in the study of animal communication. In:Darwin's Biological Work,P. R. Bell (ed.), University Press, London, pp. 150–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1977. Primate vocalizations: Affective or symbolic? In:Progress in Ape Research,G. H. Bourne (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &P. Mundinger, 1971. Vocal learning in birds. In:Ontogeny of Vertebrate Behavior,H. Moltz (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 389–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. E., 1976. Comparative neurology of vocalization and speech: Proof of a dichotomy. In:Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech,S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis & J. Lancaster (eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 280: 745–757.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————,J. A. Horel &H. S. Pennypacker, 1965. Operant control of vocal behavior in the monkey.Psychonomic Science, 3: 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owings, D. H. &R. A. Virginia, 1978. Alarm calls of California ground squirrels.Z. Tierpsychol., 46: 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. &D. Ploog, 1973. Communication among primates.Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58: 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, M. C. &B. A. Brooks, 1967. Conditioning of a vocal response in a chimpanzee through social reinforcement.Folia Primatol., 5: 70–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. E. &R. A. Hinde, 1962. Vocal communication by the rhesus monkey.Proc. Zool. Soc., Lond., 138: 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, K., 1973. Animal communication. In:Comparative Psychology: A Modern Survey,D. A. Dewsbury &D. A. Rethlingshafer (eds.), McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp. 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M., D. L. Cheney &P. Marler, 1980. Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate.Anim. Behav., 28: 1070–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirek-Ellefson, J., 1972. Social communication in some Old World monkeys. In:Primate Patterns,P. Dolhinow (ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F., 1938.Behavior of Organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1957.Verbal Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T., 1967. Auditory communication among vervet monkeys. In:Social Communication Among Primates,S. A. Altmann (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 281–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, D., C. Larson, E. M. Taylor &R. C. Lindeman, 1973. Vocalization in rhesus monkeys: Conditionability.Brain Research, 52: 225–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ————,H. H. Samson &C. R. Larson, 1978. Brain mechanisms in learned phonation ofMacaca mulatta. In:Recent Advances in Primatology: Vol. 1, Behavior,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 769–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————,R. E. Trachy &R. C. Lindeman, 1981. Vocal and nonvocal discriminative performance in monkeys.Brain and Language, 14: 93–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. R., 1968. Fixed ratio punishment by time-out of concurrent variable interval behavior.JEAB, 11: 609–616.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. A., Jr., 1975. Discriminative conditioning of vocalizations inLemur catta.Animal Behavior, 23: 432–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S. I. &R. E. Myers, 1972. Failure of discriminative vocal conditioning in rhesus monkeys.Brain Research, 37: 109–114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M., 1943.A Laboratory Colony. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was first presented at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association in April of 1984.

About this article

Cite this article

Pierce, J.D. A review of attempts to condition operantly alloprimate vocalizations. Primates 26, 202–213 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382019

Key Words

Navigation