Skip to main content
Log in

A phylogenetic study of titi monkeys, genusCallicebus, based on cranial measurements: I. Phyletic groups ofCallicebus

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examinations of 23 forms ofCallicebus were made to elucidate their phylogenetic relationships based on cranial measurements. Multivariate statistical methods of distance analysis utilizing Q-mode correlation coefficients and principal component analysis were employed. As a result, the following five distinct groups were recognized morphometrically among the 23 species and subspecies: theDonacophilus, Cupreus, Moloch, Personatus, andTorquatus groups. Moreover, the phenetic characters of cranial size, karyotype, pelage coloration, and geographic range were consistent with the results of this group classification. It could be safely concluded therefore that these groups represented phylogenetically independent groups, in view of the fact that the rate of character differentiation was not appreciably different among closely related groups. Of the five groups, thePersonatus andTorquatus groups were respectively considered to maintain a higher peculiarity of character differentiation within theCallicebus phylogeny, since these two groups individually displayed the higher magnitudes of differentiation in both their craniometric shape and some phenetic features. Conversely, the other three groups were considered to be closer to each other in theCallicebus phylogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, G. H., 1978. The craniofacial morphology of the Sulawesi macaques: multivariate approaches to biological problems. In:Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 13,F. S. Szalay (ed.), S. Karger, New York, pp. 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corruccini, R. S., 1973. Size and shape in similarity coefficients based on metric characters.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 38: 743–753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, L. E. M., 1974. Cytotaxonomy of the Platyrrhini (primates).Genen Phaenen, 17(1–2): 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egozcue, J., E. M. Perkins, F. Hagemenas, &D. M. Ford, 1969. The chromosomes of some Platyrrhini (Callicebus, Ateles, andSaimiri).Folia Primatol., 11: 17–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S. M., 1980. Phylogenetic relationships of the Platyrrhini: the evidence of the femur. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P., 1963. A systematic and zoogeographic account of the monkeys of the genusCallicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco River basins.Mammalia, 27(1): 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1988. Origin, speciation, and distribution of South American Titi monkeys, genusCallicebus (family Cebidae, Platyrrhini).Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelph., 140(1): 240–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----, 1990. Titis, New World monkeys of the genusCallicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): A Preliminary Taxonomic Review.Fieldiana, Zool. New Series, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, pp. 1–109.

  • Ichihara, K., 1990.Statistics for Bioscience. Nanedo, Tokyo. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W. G., 1981. The Titi monkeys, genusCallicebus. In:Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1,A. F. Coimbra-Filho &R. A. Mittermeier (eds.), Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 241–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &A. H. Gentry, 1979. Habitat utilization in two species ofCallicebus. In:Primate Ecology: Problem Oriented Field Studies,R. W. Sussman (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, S., 1990. A morphological study of upper first and second molars in the genusCallicebus.J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 98(2): 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1991. A cranial size difference in the genusCallicebus. In:Primatology Today, Proceedings of the XIIIth Congress of the International Primatological Society,A. Ehara,T. Kimura,O. Takenaka, &M. Iwamoto (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 535–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. &K. Saller, 1957.Lehrbuch der Anthropologie, Vol. 1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minezawa, M., O. C. Jordan C., &C. J. Valdivia B., 1989. Karyotypic study of Titi monkeys,Callicebus moloch brunneus.Primates, 30: 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natori, M. &T. Hanihara, 1988. An analysis of interspecific relationships ofSaguinus based on cranial measurements.Primates, 29: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieczarka, J. C. &C. Y. Nagamachi, 1988. The karyotype ofCallicebus moloch moloch (Cebidae, Primates).Rev. Brasil. Genet., 11(3): 653–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., 1982. Forest refuges: evidence from woody angiosperms. In:Biological Diversification in the Tropics,G. T. Prance (ed.), Columbia Univ. Press, New York, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. &R. R. Sokal, 1965. Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy.Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 45: 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. &R. R. Sokal, 1973.Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T., 1977.Jintai Keisoku. Ningen to Gijyutsusha, Tokyo. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kobayashi, S. A phylogenetic study of titi monkeys, genusCallicebus, based on cranial measurements: I. Phyletic groups ofCallicebus . Primates 36, 101–120 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381918

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381918

Key Words

Navigation