Skip to main content
Log in

Dental agenesis as evidence of possible genetic isolation in the colobine monkey,Rhinopithecus roxellana

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a sample of 24 skulls of the rare colobine monkey of China,Rhinopithecus roxellana, agenesis of the permanent upper third premolar was observed in 8 specimens (33%). Two of the individuals (8% of the sample) showed unilateral agenesis, while six (25%) showed bilateral agenesis. All of the affected individuals appear to have originated from two areas in central Sichuan Province in China, Moupin (Baoxing) and Wen Chuan, that lie approximately 120 km apart on the western rim of the Sichuan Basin. In this species agenesis of the upper third premolar was generally accompanied by rotation of the upper fourth premolar, but not by any other observable variation in tooth size, morphology, or number. Further, dental agenesis in this species appears to have had no effect craniofacial morphology. In certain human populations, a high prevalence of dental agenesis has been associated with small population effects and genetic isolation. Premolar agenesis inR. roxellana can probably be traced to a similar origin. Reconstruction of the evolutionary history of the species indicates that a severe reduction of the geographic range of the species occurred as a result of climatic deterioration during the Late Pleistocene. Although large numbers of populations appear to have become extinct, others survived to give rise to the modern populations of the species that inhabit China today. The two populations showing a high prevalence of premolar agenesis appear to have originated from one that passed through a population bottleneck and suffered the consequences of founder effect in the Late Pleistocene. This interpretation is supported by evidence of dental agenesis in a population of an insectivore species from the same region and by the fact that premolar agenesis is not found in any of the other species ofRhinopithecus. There is no evidence to support the interpretation that dental agenesis inR. roxellana is due to natural selection, mutation or an evolutionary force other than a small population effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brace, C. L., K. R. Rosenberg, &K. D. Hunt, 1987. Gradual change in human tooth size in the Late Pleistocene and Post-Pleistocene.Evolution, 41: 705–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, E. H. &D. A. Hooijer, 1953. Pleistocene mammals from the limestone fissures of Szechuan, China.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 102: 1–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyer, F., 1936.Variations and Diseases of the Teeth of Animals. John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, L. W., 1978. Congenital absence of teeth: a review with emphasis on inheritance patterns.J. Amer. Dent. Ass., 96: 266–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grahnén, H., 1956. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition.Odont. Rev., 7 (Suppl. 3): 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooijer, D. A., 1952. Notes on the dentition of the golden monkey,Rhinopithecus.J. Mammal., 33: 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, W. L. &R. F. Kay, 1975. Maxillary premolar reduction in the golden monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellanae).J. Dent. Res., 54: 1242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N. G., 1991. Dental variations in species ofRhinopithecus and their relationship to the evolution of the genus.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., (Suppl. 12): 98. (Abstract)

  • ———— &Y.-M. Gu, 1991. A reassessment ofMegamacaca lantianensis, a large monkey from the Pleistocene of north-central China.J. Human Evol., 20: 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &Y.-R. Pan, 1988. The evolution and palaeobiogeography of monkeys in China. In:The Palaeoenvironment of East Asia from the Mid-Tertiary, Vol. II,P. Whyte,J. Aigner,N. G. Jablonski,G. Taylor,D. Walker,P.-X. Wang, andC. L. So (eds.), Centre of Asian Studies, Hong Kong, pp. 849–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johr, A. C., 1934. Reduktionserscheinungen an den oberen seitlichen Schneiderzflhnen.Arch. J. Klaus-Stiftung, 9: 6–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirveskari, P., H. Hansson, B. Hedegard, &V. Karlsson, 1978. Crown size and hypodontia in the permanent dentition of modern Skolt Lapps.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 48: 107–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, C. L. B. &W. J. Moore, 1973. The incidence of agenesis and polygenesis in the primate dentition.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 38: 671–680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaney, M. C., T. M. Fujiwara, &K. Morgan, 1990. Dental agenesis in the Dariusleut Hutterite Brethren: Comparisons to selected caucasoid population surveys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 82: 165–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, W. H., 1937. Variable dentition in a Chinese insectivore.Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Zool., 20: 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, B. K. &M. A. Spence, 1974. The genetics of hypodontia.J. Dent. Res., 53: 781–785.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, S. O., 1953. Missing teeth with special reference to the population of Tristan da Cunha.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 10: 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jablonski, N.G. Dental agenesis as evidence of possible genetic isolation in the colobine monkey,Rhinopithecus roxellana . Primates 33, 371–376 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381198

Key Words

Navigation