Skip to main content
Log in

Age differences in locomotion of two subtropical galaginae

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The locomotor behaviour ofGalago senegalensis andG. crassicaudatus (Primates: Lorisidae) was quantified in an 11-month field study in the Northern Transvaal of South Africa. This paper assesses the distinction between the behaviour of adults, and that of infants at the age when they first began foraging independently, taking into account seasonal variations in adult behaviour. Infants of both species differ significantly from adults in the types of locomotion they use, postures, activity, support use, height of observation and tree use. While all these factors are inter-connected, it is concluded that infants exploit a quantitatively different part of the arboreal habitat from adults, because of factors such as locomotor maturation and gross body size. Dietary differences are also possible but the present study cannot establish or deny this possibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bearder, S. K. &G. A. Doyle, 1974. Ecology of bushbabies,Galago senegalensis andGalago crassicaudatus, with some notes on their behaviour in the field. In:Prosimian Biology,R. D. Martin,G. A. Doyle &A. C. Walker (eds.), Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartmill, M. &K. Milton, 1977. The lorisiform wrist joint and the evolution of “brachiating” adaptations in the Hominoidea.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 47: 249–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. H., 1980.Galago locomotion. Unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard Univ., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----, in press. Foraging, habitat structure and locomotion in two species ofGalago. In:Foraging in Non-human Primates,J. Cant & P. Rodman (eds.), Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

  • Doyle, G. A., 1979. Development of behaviour in prosimians. In:The Study of Prosimian Behaviour,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 157–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G., 1977. Locomotor behaviour and muscular anatomy of sympatric Malaysian leaf-monkeys (Presbytis obscura andPresbytis melalophos).Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 46: 297–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. N., C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner &D. H. Bent, 1977.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemitz, C., 1974. A contribution to the postnatal behavioural development ofTarsius bancanus Horsfield, 1821, studied in two cases.Folia Primatol., 21: 250–276.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pough, F. H., 1973. Lizard energetics and diet.Ecology, 54(4): 837–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, S., 1967. The leaping of langurs: a problem in the study of locomotor adaptation.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 26: 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Crompton, R.H. Age differences in locomotion of two subtropical galaginae. Primates 24, 241–259 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381086

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381086

Keywords

Navigation