Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of soil contamination with copper, lead and arsenic on the growth and composition of plants

II. Effects of source of contamination, varying soil pH, and prior waterlogging

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of soil pH and a prior waterlogging treatment on the uptake of copper, lead and arsenic by radish and silver beet were investigated in a glasshouse experiment. Eight soils were compared, two of which were former orchard soils, two existing orchard soils, two dosed with copper, lead and arsenic, and two affected either by mining or by orebody mineralisation.

Both the lead and copper concentrations of the plants decreased with increasing soil pH, the effect being more marked in the more highly contaminated soils. Relatively more copper than lead was translocated to the tops of the radish plants. Arsenic concentrations were less sensitive to changes in soil pH. Lower yields, lower copper concentrations in silver beet and toxicity symptoms in some acid soil treatments were more likely due to aluminium and/or manganese than to excess copper, lead or arsenic. The prior waterlogging treatment had few effects that were interpretable in terms of soil analysis or plant composition.

The soils used behaved similarly no matter what the source of contamination, with two exceptions. Soils dosed with copper, lead and arsenic did not always behave in the same manner as did soils contaminated with orchard sprays in the field and some toxic elements may be occluded or locked away in a mineral form that is not available to plants. The findings emphasize problems of interpretation of results obtained with freshly amended soils compared to soils contaminated in the field.

Under some conditions in contaminated soils, DTPA extractions for copper and lead may be inappropriate as the amounts extracted increased with increasing soil pH while plant uptake decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abd-Elfattah A and Wada K 1981 Adsorption of lead, copper, zinc, cobalt, and cadmium by soils that differ in cation exchange materials. J. Soil Sci. 32, 271–283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow, N J 1974 The slow reactions between soil and anions: 1 Effects of time, temperature, and water content of a soil on the decrease in effectiveness of phosphate for plant growth. Soil Sci. 118, 380–386.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blevins R L and Massey H F 1959 Evaluation of two methods of measuring available soil copper and the effects of soil pH and extractable aluminium on copper uptake by plants. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 23, 296–298.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fordham A W and Norrish K 1979 Arsenate-73 uptake by components of several acidic soils and its implications for phosphate retention. Aust. J. Soil Res. 17, 307–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keaton C M 1937 The influence of lead compounds on the growth of barley. Soil Sci. 43, 401–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Korcak R F and Fanning D S 1978 Extractability of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc by double acidversus DTPA and plant content at excessive soil levels. J. Environ. Qual. 7, 506–512.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liebig G F, Vanselow A P and Chapman H D 1942 Effects of aluminium on copper toxicity, as revealed by solution culture and spectrographic studies of citrus. Soil Sci. 53, 341–351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsay W L and Norvell W A 1978 Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 421–428.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McKenzie R M 1978 The effects of two manganese dioxides on the uptake of lead, cobalt, nickel, copper and zinc by subterranean clover. Aust. J. Soil Res. 16, 209–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Merry R H, Tiller K G and Alston A M 1983 Accumulation of copper, lead and arsenic in some Australian orchard soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 21, 549–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Merry R H, Tiller K G and Alston A M 1985 The effects of contamination of soil with copper, lead and arsenic on the growth and composition of plants. I. Effects of season, genotype, soil temperature and fertilizers. Plant and Soil 91, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merry R H and Zarcinas B A 1980 Spectrophotometric determination of arsenic and antimony by the silver diethyldithiocarbamate method. Analyst 105, 558–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Northocote K H 1979 A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils. Third Edition Rellim Technical Publications, Adelaide. 124 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norrish K 1975 Geochemistry and mineralogy of trace elements. pp. 55–81.In Trace Elements in Soil-Plant-Animal Systems. Eds. D J D Nicholas and A R Egan. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soil Survey Staff 1975 Soil Taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Soil Conservation Service, USDA. US Government Printing Office. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh L M, Ernhardt W H and Seibel H D 1972 Copper toxicity in snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Environ. Qual. 1, 197–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merry, R.H., Tiller, K.G. & Alston, A.M. The effects of soil contamination with copper, lead and arsenic on the growth and composition of plants. Plant Soil 95, 255–269 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02375077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02375077

Key words

Navigation