Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of honeydew and hosts on plant colonization by the aphid parasitoidEphedrus cerasicola

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Females ofEphedrus cerasicola Starý were released into small glasshouses (13.6 m3) or cages (0.125 m3) which contained paprika plants in 2 of the following categories: fresh plants (without honeydew and aphids), honeydew-contaminated plants (aphids removed) and aphid-infested plants (with honeydew). Two hundred females were released into each glasshouse with 20 plants, 10 of each category, while 10 females were released into the cages with 2 plants, one of each category. Control experiments with only fresh plants were conducted in both the glasshouses and the cages. The female parasitoids on each plant were counted at regular intervals for 24 or 48 h in the glasshouse and for 4 h in the cage experiments; this number was used as an indicator of plant preferences. The following preferences were established (preferred plant > less preferred plant): honeydew-plant > fresh plant, aphid-plant > fresh plant, aphid-plant > honeydew-plant. The number of females on the aphid-plants increased throughout the experimental period, whereas the number on the honeydew-plants tended to be more stable.

Résumé

Des femelles d'Ephedrus cerasicola Starý ont été lâchées dans des petites serres (13,6 m3) ou des cages (0,125 m3) qui contenaient des plants de paprika de 2 types: plants frais (sans miellat, ni pucerons), plants recouverts de miellat sans pucerons et plants infestés par les pucerons (avec miellat). Deux cent femelles ont été lâchées dans chaque serre avec 20 plants, dix de chaque type, tandis que 10 femelles étaient lâchées dans les cages avec 2 plants, un de chaque type. Les expériences de contrôle étaient menées avec uniquement des plants frais à la fois dans les serres et en cages. Les femelles de parasitoïde étaient dénombrées sur chaque plant à intervalle régulier de 24 heures ou 48 heures en serre et toutes les 4 heures dans les cages expérimentales; leur nombre était utilisé en tant qu'indicateur de choix. Les choix suivants ont été établis (plante préférée > plante moins visitée) miellat-plante > plante fraîche, puceron-plante > plante fraîche, pucerons-plante > miellat-plante. Le nombre de femelles sur les plants infestés de pucerons augmentait au cours de l'expérimentation, tandis que leur nombre sur les plants couverts de miellat tendait à demeurer plus stable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinlosotu, T. A. — 1978. Some aspects of the host finding behaviour of the femaleDiaeretiella rapae McIntosh [Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae] —Nigerian J. Entomol., 1, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayal, Y. — 1987. The foraging strategy ofDiaeretiella rapae. I. The concept of the elementary unit of foraging. —J. Anim. Ecol., 56, 1057–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, Y. &Cloutier, C. — 1984. Honeydew as a source of host-searching kairomones for the aphid parasitoidAphidius nigripes [Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae]. —Can. J. Zool., 62, 1513–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, Y. &Cloutier, C. — 1985. Role of olfaction in host finding by aphid parasitoidAphidius nigripes [Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae]. —J. Chem. Ecol., 11, 801–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, U. — 1986 Taxonomic and biological revision of PalearcticEphedrus Haliday [Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae]. —Entomol. scand. Suppl., 27, 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. &Dixon, A. F. G. — 1985. Plant structure and the foraging success ofAphidius rhopalosiphi [Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae]. —Ecol. Entomol., 10, 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. S. — 1987. Agricultural insect pests of temperate regions and their control. —Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 659 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hågvar, E. B. &Hofsvang, T. — 1987. Foraging by the aphid parasitoidEphedrus cerasicola for patchily distributed hosts. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 44, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M. &Starý, P; — 1967. Hym. Ichneumonoidea, World Aphidiidae. In: Index of entomophagous insects (V. Delucchi &G. Remaudière, eds.). —Le François, Paris, 1–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. &Zhang Zhi-Li. — 1983. The reactions of two cereal aphid parasitoids,Aphidius uzbekistanicus andA. ervi to host aphids and their food-plants. —Physiol. Entomol., 8, 439–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. P., Feeny, P. P. &Root, R. B. — 1970. Habitat selection by the aphid parasiteDiaeretiella rapae [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] and hyperparasiteCharips brassicae [Hymenoptera: Cynipidae]. —Can. Entomol., 102, 1567–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, D. J. &Starks, K. J. — 1974. Response ofLysiphlebus testaceipes in an olfactometer to a host and a non-host insect and to plants. —Environ. Entomol., 3, 1034–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starý, P; — 1976. Aphid parasites [Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae] of the Mediterranean area. —Dr. W. Junk B. V., The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B. L. — 1947. The generalization of “Student” problem when several different population variances are involved. —Biometrika, 34, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hågvar, E.B., Hofsvang, T. Effect of honeydew and hosts on plant colonization by the aphid parasitoidEphedrus cerasicola . Entomophaga 34, 495–501 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374387

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374387

Key-Words

Mots Clés

Navigation