Skip to main content
Log in

Palato-facial comparison ofDryopithecus (Proconsul) with extant catarrhines

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multivariate shape analysis of 15 palato-facial measurements of the RusingaD. africanus and MorotoD. major specimens in comparison with apes and monkeys fails to support the hypothesis of special relationship between the dryopithecine species and extant African pongids. TheD. africanus shares with gibbons and cercopithecoids the primitive catarrhine metrical pattern, while chimpanzees and gorillas show a different, derived pattern. TheD. major shows partial convergence on the shape pattern typifying gorillas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, P., 1973. Miocene primates (Pongidae, Hylobatidae) of East Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge.

  • ————, 1974. New species ofDryopithecus from Kenya.Nature, 249: 188–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. E., Le Gros, & L. S. B. Leakey, 1951. The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa.Fossil Mammals of Africa, vol. 1.

  • Conroy, G. C. &J. Fleagle, 1972. Locomotor behavior in fossil and living pongids.Nature, 227: 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corruccini, R. S., 1975a, Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: some considerations.J. Hum. Evol., 4: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1975b. Morphometric affinities in the forelimb of anthropoid primates.Z. Morph. Anthrop., 67: 19–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ---- &R. L. Ciochon, 1976. Morphometric affinities of the human shoulder.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., in press.

  • ————, ————, 1975. Ostemetric shape relationships in the wrist joint of some anthropoids.Folia. primat., 24: 250–274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ----, ----Corruccini, R. S. R. L. Ciochon & ----H. M. McHenry, 1976. The postcranium of Miocene hominoids: were dryopithecines merely “dental apes”?Primates, 17: 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delson, E., 1975. Evolutionary history of the Cercopithecidae: In:Szalay Approaches to Primate Paleobiology, Karger, Basel, pp. 167–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1975. Evolution and interrelationships of the catarrhine primates. In:Luckett and Szalay Phylogeny of the Primates: A Multidisciplanary Approach, Plenum, New York, pp. 405–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C. P., 1971. Distribution and place of origin of the gorilla.Man, 6: 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Koenigswald, G. H. R., 1968. The phylogenetical position of the Hylobatidae. In:Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Old World Primates with References to the Origin of Man,B. Chiarelli (ed.), Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knussmann, R., 1967.Humerus, Ulna und Radius der Simiae. Bibliotheca Primatologica, No. 5, Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, G. W., 1973.Physical Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. &R. S. Corruccini, 1975. Distal humerus in hominoid evolution.Folia primat., 23: 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----McHenry, H. M. & ----R. S. Corruccini, 1976. The affinities of tertiary hominoid femora.Folia primat., 26: 139–150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morbeck, M. E., 1972. A re-examination of the forelimb of the Miocene Hominoidea. Ph.D. dissertation, Berkeley.

  • Pilbeam, D. R., 1967. Tertiary pongidae of east Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale.

  • ————, 1969a. Tertiary pongidae of east Africa: evolutionary relationships and taxonomy.Peabody Mus. Bull., 31: 1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1969b. Possible identity of Miocene tali from Kenya.Nature, 223: 648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich, V. M., 1971. A molecular approach to the question of human origins. In:Background for Man,Dolhinow &Sarich (eds.), Little Brown, Boston, pp. 60–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1973. Just how old is the hominid line?Yearb. Phys. Anthrop., 17: 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., 1972.Primate Evolution. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1965. Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea).Folia. primat., 3: 81–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ----Simons, E. L. & ----D. R. Pilbeam, 1972. Hominoid paleoprimatology. In:The Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates,Tuttle (ed.), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 36–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1963. The meaning of taxonomic statements. In:Classification and Human Evolution,Washburn (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, R., 1967. Knuckle-walking and the evolution of hominoid hands.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 26: 171–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C., 1966. Morphologische studien am gesichtsschadel catarrhiner primaten.Biblio. Primat., 4: 1–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, S. L., 1968.The Study of Human Evolution. Univ. Oregon Press, Eugene.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1972. Human evolution.Evol. Biol., 6: 349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. A., 1974. Locomotor affiinities of hominoid tali from Kenya.Nature, 246: 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwell, M. &G. C. Conroy, 1973. Multivariate analysis of theDryopithecus africanus forelimb.Nature, 244: 373–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Corruccini, R.S., Henderson, A.M. Palato-facial comparison ofDryopithecus (Proconsul) with extant catarrhines. Primates 19, 35–44 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373225

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373225

Keywords

Navigation