Skip to main content
Log in

Differential responses to K deficiency among soybean cultivars

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seed yield per unit of potassium applied differed for five soybean cultivars which were grown to maturity under different K regimes in a glasshouse. Whereas Dodds was the most responsive cultivar to moderate increases in K supply, the cultivar Bragg was the most efficient in its ability to produce seed with low levels of available K; Lee and Forest were the least efficient cultivars while Bossier and Dodds were of intermediate efficiency. The basis for the efficiency of cv. Bragg was that the growth of its tops, as indicated by mature stem weights and its roots, were less affected by reduced K supply than those of other cultivars. This enabled it to produce more pods under K-deficient regimes, resulting in a greater seed yield per plant. The percentage reduction in oil/protein ratios in the seed of the five cultivars under moderate K deficiency correlated closely with reductions in seed yield. However, changes in this ratio were poorly related to the K percentages in the seed. All cultivars experienced an impairment of plant senescence under K deficiency as evidenced by a reduction in leaf abcission and a delay in pod maturity. The existence of genetic diversity in K-use efficiency means that breeding programmes could utilize K-efficient germplasm in developing new cultivars for soils not naturally high in potassium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley D A and Goodson R D 1972 Effect of time and plant K status on14C-labelled photosynthetic movement in cotton. Crop Sci. 12, 689–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baligar V C and Barber S A 1970 Genotype differences of corn in ion uptake. Agron. J. 71, 870–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber S A 1984 Soil Nutrient Bioavailability John Wiley and Sons, New York, 398 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J C and Jones W E 1979 Fitting plants nutritionally to soils. I. Soybeans. Agron. J. 69, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins F I, Alexander D E, Rodgers R C, and Silvela S 1967 Analysis of oil content of soybeans by wide-line NMR. J. Am. Oil Chemists. Soc. 44, 708–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO-UNESCO 1974 Soil Map of the World, Vol. 1, Legend, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerloff G C 1976 Plant efficiencies in the use of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.In Plant Adaptation to Mineral Stress. Ed. M J Wright, pp 161–173. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeder,H E, Mengel K and Forster H 1973 The effect of potassium on translocation of photosynthates and yield pattern of potato plants. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 24, 1479–1487.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartt C E 1969 Effect of potassium deficiency upon translocation of14C in attached blades and entire plants of sugarcane. Plant Physiol. 44, 1461–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heenan D P and Campbell L C 1980 Growth, yield components and seed composition of two soybean cultivars as affected by manganese supply. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31, 471–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heenan D P, and Campbell L C and Carter O G 1981 Inheritance of tolerance to high manganese supply in soybeans. Crop Sci. 21, 625–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindoo S J and Noodén L D 1976 The interrelation of fruit development and leaf senescence in ‘Anoka’ soybeans. Bot. Gaz. 137, 218–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K and Viro M 1974 Effect of potassium supply on the transport of photosynthates to the fruits of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Physiol. Plant. 30, 295–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pate J S 1976 Nutrients and metabolites of fluids recovered from xylem and phloem: significance in relation long-distance transport in plants.In Transport and Transfer Processes in Plants. Eds. I F Wardlaw and J B Passioura pp 251–281. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose I A, Felton W L and Banks L W 1981 Response of four soybean varieties to foliar zinc fertilizer. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 21, 236–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale P W G 1981 Seed Composition in Soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) with Reference to Mineral Nutrition. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney.

  • Sale P W G and Campbell L C 1986 Yield and composition of soybean seed as a function of potassium supply. Plant and Soil 96, 317–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shea P F, Gerloff G C and Gabelman W H 1968 Differing efficiencies of potassium utilization in strains of snapbeans,Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant and Soil 28, 337–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibles R, Anderson I C and Gibbon A H 1975 Soybean.In Crop Physiology, Ed. L J Evans. pp 151–190. Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Silverbush M and Barber S A 1983 Sensitivity analysis of parameters used in simulating K uptake with a mechanistic mathematical model. Agron. J. 75, 851–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R and de Wit C T 1975 Photosynthetic and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 189, 565–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Streeter J G 1979 Allantoin and allantoic acid in tissues and stem exudate from field-grown soybean plants. Plant Physiol. 63, 478–480.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida S, Forno D, Cock J H and Gomez K A 1972 Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice, pp 11–12. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los Bãnos, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sale, P.W.G., Campbell, L.C. Differential responses to K deficiency among soybean cultivars. Plant Soil 104, 183–190 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372531

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372531

Key words

Navigation