Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral aspects of mass-rearing of insects

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present situation and objectives of mass rearing insects are reviewed under the aspect of behavior. The highest degree of “typical” behavior is required in those species that have to compete with their natural counterparts in the field. Selection pressure and conditioning during the process of mass rearing might alter the behavior of the organisms produced under artificial conditions and cause failures of field-releases. Problems that warrant more considerations are displacement failure to reach natural counterparts and the possibility of the evolution of new pest species. A sequence of actions is suggested for establishing a quality control program that elucidates the behavioral status of laboratory-reared strains.

Résumé

La situation présente et les buts de l’élevage en masse des insectes sont résumés sous l’aspect du comportement. Le plus haut degré de comportement «typique» est exigé pour les espèces qui doivent exercer une action intraspécifique dans la nature.

La pression de sélection et le conditionnement pendant l’élevage en masse peuvent changer le comportement des organismes élevés dans des conditions artificielles et provoquer des échecs de lâchers en plein champ. Les problèmes qui demandent plus de considérations au sujet des lâchers sont les facultés de déplacement, l’incapacité des insectes élevés en laboratoire d’atteindre leurs partenaires naturels et la possibilité d’évolution de nouvelles espèces nuisibles. Une série d’actions est suggérée pour examiner la qualité de la production au point de vue du comportement de souches élevées en laboratoires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley, D. A. &Hightower, B. G. — 1966. Mating behavior of the screw-worm fly as affected by differences in strain and size. —J. econ. Entomol.,59, 1499–1502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumhover, A. H. — 1965. Sexual aggressiveness of male screw-worm flies measured by effect on female mortality. —J. econ. Entomol.,58, 544–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. D. & Chippendale, G. M. — 1968. Environmental aspects of the massrearing of plant-feeding Lepidopterans. In: Radiation, Radioisotopes and Rearing Methods in the Control of Insect Pests,IAEA Panel Proceeding Series.

  • Boller, E., Haisch, A. & Prokopy, R. J. — 1971. Sterile insect release method againstRhagoletis cerasi L. Preparatory ecological and behavioural studies. —Proc. Symp. IAEA/FAO on «Sterility Principle for Insect Control or Eradication», 1970, Athens.

  • Bush, G. L. — 1969. Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genusRhagoletis [Diptera, Tephritidae]. —Evolution,23, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. L. &O’Connell, T.B. — 1969. A flight mill for studies with the Mexican fruit fly. —Ann. Ent. Soc. America,62, 917–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dame, A., Woodard, D. B., Ford, H. R. &Weidhaas, D. E. — 1964. Field behavior of sexually sterileAnopheles quadrimaculatus males. —Mosquito News,24, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. — 1937. Genetics and the origin of species (1st ed.). —Columbia University Press.

  • Ehrman, L. — 1964. Genetic divergence inM. Vetukhiv’s experimental population ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. I. Rudiments of sexual isolation. —Genet. Res. Camb.,5, 150–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, G. L. &Fisher, T. W. — 1964. Culture of entomophagous insects and their hosts. In: Biological control of insect pests and weeds (P. De Bach ed.) —Chapman & Hall, London, p. 344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, L. W., Claborn, H. V., Turner, J. P. &Lopez, E. — 1968. Difference in response of two strains of screw-worm flies to male pheromones. —J. econ. Entomol.,61, 1386–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fye, R. L. &La Brecque G. C. — 1966. Sexual acceptability of laboratory strains to male house flies in competition with wild strains. —J. econ. Entomol.,59, 538–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, R. T. — 1968. Mass rearing of insects: its concept, methods, and problems. In: Radiation, radioisotopes and rearing methods in the control of insect pests. —IAEA Panel Proceeding Series.

  • Hooper, G. H. S. — 1970. Use of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and cold to immobilize adults of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly. —J. econ. Entomol.,63, 1962–1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. D. — 1917. (a discussion ofC. G. Hewitt’s paper on “Insect Behaviour”). —J. econ. Entomol.,10, 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T., Hanson, F. E. &Dethier, V. G. — 1968. Induction of specific food preference in Lepidopterous larvae. —Ext. exp. & appl.,11, 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipling, E. F. — 1966. In: Insect colonization and mass production (C. N. Smith ed.). —Academic Press, p. 8.

  • Kishaba, A. N., Henneberry, T. J., Hancock, P. J. &Toba, H. H. — 1967. Laboratory technique for studying flight of cabbage looper moths and the effects of age, sex, food, and Tepa on flight characteristics. —J. econ. Entomol.,60, 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. &Birch, L. C. — 1966. Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. —Evolution,20, 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. — 1961. The effects of artificial selection for mating speed inDrosophila melanogaster. —Anim. Behaviour,9, 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— — 1967. “Pre-imaginal Conditioning” inDrosophila. —Nature,216, 338–340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. — 1963. Animal species and evolution. —Harvard University Press.

  • Monro, J. — 1966. Population “flushing” with sexually sterile insects. —Science,151, 1536–1538.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. — 1967. The genetic analysis of behaviour. Methuen’s monographs on biological subjects. —Methuen, London, 174 pp.

  • Parsons, P. A. &Kaul, D. — 1966. Mating speed and duration of copulation inDrosophila pseudoobscura. —Heredity,21, 219–225.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, K. S. — 1969. Status of the sterile-male technique for mosquito control. In: Sterile-male technique for eradication or control of harmful insects. —IAEA Proceeding Series.

  • Schoonhoven, L. M. — 1967. Loss of hostplant specificity byManduca sexta after rearing on an artificial diet. —Ent. exp. & appl.,10, 270–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spates, G. E. &Hightower, B. C. — 1967. Sexual aggressiveness of male screwworm flies affected by laboratory rearing. —J. econ. Entomol.,60, 752–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, L. F., Mitchell, W. C. &Baumhover, A. H. — 1962. Progress of fruit fly control by irradiation sterilization in Hawaii and the Mariana Islands. —Int. J. appl. Radiat. Isotopes,13, 427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W. H. — 1939. Further studies on pre-imaginal olfactory conditioning in insects. —Proc. Roy. Soc. B, London,127, 424–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W. H. &Jones, F. — 1937. Olfactory conditioning in a parasitic insect and its relation to the problem of host selection. —Proc. Roy. Soc. B. London,124, 56–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros, E. &Krimbas, C. B. — 1970. Frequency of female digamy in a natural population of the olive fruit fly,Dacus oleae as found by using enzyme polymorphism. —Ent. exp. & appl.,13, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boller, E. Behavioral aspects of mass-rearing of insects. Entomophaga 17, 9–25 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371070

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371070

Keywords

Navigation