Abstract
A review of recent attempts of biological control of small moth borers of sugar caneDiatraea spp in the various contries in the West Indies, North and South America is given. In several areas where successful biological control has been achieved, the relative costs of the campaigns and the resultant added revenue are discussed.
Résumé
Il est procédé à une revue des récents essais de lutte biologique contre les petits foreurs de la Canne à sucre,Diatraea spp., dans diverses régions des Antilles et de l'Amérique du Nord et du Sud.
Dans plusierus cas où des succès ont été obtenus, le bilan économique de l'intervention biologique est établi: frais occasionnés et bénéfices dus aux augmentations de récolte.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alam, M. M., Bennett, F. D. & Carl, K. — 1971. Biological control ofDiatraea saccharalis (F.) in Barbados byApanteles flavipes Cam. andLixophaga diatraene T. T. —Entomophaga,16 (2).
Bates, J.F. — 1954. The status of moth borer in British Guiana. —Proc. british. W. Indies Sug. Technol. 1954, 126–136.
— — 1967. Investigations on moth borrers in British Guiana. —Proc. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol.,12, 1349–1367.
Bennett, F. D. — 1969. Tachinid flies as biological control agents for sugar cane moth borers. Chapter 5, Pests of sugar cane byJ. R. Williams and others. —Elsevier, Amsterdam, 117–148
Bennett, F. D. & Beg, M. M. — 1970. Report on a visit to the Cauca Valley, Colombia, to collect,Jaynesleskia jaynesi [Tachinidae] a parasite ofDiatraea spp., May 1970. —Commonw. Inst. biol. Contr. Unpubl. report, 13 pp.
Bennett, F. D. & Pschorn-Walcher, H. — 1970. Recent investigations on the biological control ofDiatraea spp. in Trinidad, The Lesser Antilles and Barbados. —ISSCT Proc. 13thCongress, 1321–1330.
Bergamin, J. — 1964. Pragas e molestias in Cultura e adubaçao de cana-de-açuear. —Sao Paulo, Inst. Bras. Potassa, 191–207.
Box, H.E. — 1938. Observations on sugar cane moth borers (Diatraea spp.) in St. Lucia — III. The introduction and establishment of the Amazon fly (Metagonistylum minense Townsend) and control ofDiatraea saccharalis Fabricius by means of this parasite. —Castries, St. Lucia, Govt. Print. Office, 25 pp.
— — 1952. Biological control of insect pests of sugar cane with special reference to the West Indian region. —Proc. agric. Soc. Trinidad,52, 183–200.
— — 1953. The control of sugar cane moth borers (Diatraea) in Venezuela. 1 A preliminary account. —Trop. Agric., Trinidad,30, 97–113.
— — 1956. The biological control of moth-borers (Diatraea) in Venezuela. Battle against Venezuela's cane borer., —Sugar. N. Y. 51 (5), 25–27, 30, 45; (6), 34–36, 57; (7), 30–34.
— — 1960. Status of the moth-borer,Diatraea saccharalis (F.), and its parasites in St. Kitts, Antigua and St. Lucia; with observations on Guadeloupe and an account of the situation in Haiti. —Proc. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol.,10, 901–914.
Carl, K. — 1967. Report on a survey of mowth-borer parasites in Guadeloupe, July 17–22, 1967. —Commonw. Inst. Biol. Contr. Unpubl. report, 13 pp.
Cleare, L. D. — 1939. The Amazon fly (Metagonistylum minense,Towns.) in British Guiana. —Bull. ent. Res.,30, 85–102.
Costa, J. A. — 1965. Actividades de la seccion de Entomologia del Instituto para el Fomento de la Productividad azucarera (IFPA) desde su iniciation en Noviembre de 1963. Hasta el 31 de Agosto de 1965. —Bol. Inst. par. Fomento Productividad Azucarera, 8, 44 pp.
Fernandez, O.J.E — 1960. Estudio de los taladradores de la cana de azucar del generoDiatraea [Pyralididae: Lepidoptera] y su importancia economia en Costa Rica. —Unpubl. Thesis, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de Costa Rica, 166 pp.
Flores, C., S. & Abarca, R. M. — 1961. Principales plagas de la cana de azucar en Mexico. —Inst. par. Mejoriemento Proc. Azucar, Bol. 4, 101 pp.
Fretay, E. — 1960. Contribution à la lutte contre le borer de la canne (Diatraea saccharalis). —Proc. british W. Indies Sug. Technol, 1960, 141–146.
Gaviria, M., J. D. — 1967. Biologia y ecologia del barrendor de la cana de azucarDiatraea saccharalis Fabr. [Lep. Pyralididae]. Su control mediante la cria y propagacion artificial del parasitoParatheresia claripalpis Wulp. [Dip. Tachinidae], en el Ingenio «San Carlos», Prov. del Guayas — Ecuador. —Unpubl. Thesis, Facultad de Agronomia y Veterinaria de la Universidad de Guayaquil, 229 pp.
Gifford, J. R. &Mann, G. A. — 1967. Biology, rearing and a trial release ofApanteles flavipes in the Florida Everglades to control the sugar cane borer. —J. econ. Entomol.,60, 44–47.
Guagliumi, P. — 1962. Las plagas de la cana de Azucar en Venezuela,2, Maracay,Minist. Agric. Cria, 850 pp.
Hensley, S. D. — 1969. Current status of sugar cane borer control in Louisiana. —Proc. amer. soc. Sug. Cane Technol.,16, 39–60.
Jaynes, H. A. — 1939. Further attempts to establishLixophaga diatraeae (Towns.) and other sugar cane borer parasites in Louisiana and Florida, with recoveries in 1936 and 1937. —Proc. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol.,6, 245–248.
Jaynes, H. A. & Bynum, E. K. — 1941. Experiments withTrichogramma as a control of the sugar cane borer in Louisiana. —Tech. Bull. USDA, No. 743, 42 pp.
Jepson, W.F. — 1954. A critical review of the world literature on the Lepidopterous stalk borers of tropical Graminaceous crops. —London, Commonw. Inst. Ent., 127 pp.
Lemaire, Y. — 1966. Infestation status of sugar cane plantations in Guadeloupe byDiatraea saccharalis, importance ofLixophaga andMetagonistylum parasitism. —Proc. british. W. Indies Sug. Technol, 1966, 304–307.
Metcalfe, J.R. — 1960. The introduction of larval parasites of mothborer [Diatraea saccharalis (F.)] into Barbados, a progress report. —Bridgetown, Dep. Sci. Agric., Barbados, 9 pp. (mimeo.)
Metcalfe, J. R. & vanWhervin, L. W. —1967. Studies of mass-liberation and natural populations of the egg parasites of moth borer,Diatraea saccharalis (F.) in Barbados. —ISSCT Proc. 12th Congress, 1420–1434.
Metcalfe, J.R. &Brenière, J. — 1969. Egg parasites for control of sugar cane moth borer. Chapter 4, Pests of sugar cane byJ. R. Williams and others. —Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Miskimen, G. W. — 1962. Studies of the biological control ofDiatraea saccharalis F. [Lepidoptera: Crambidae] on St. Croiz, U.S. Virgin Islands. —J. Agric. Univ. P. Rico,46, 135–139.
Myers, J. G. — 1934. The discovery and introduction of the Amazon fly. A new parasite for cane borersDiatraea spp. —Trop. Agric., Trinidad,11, 191–195
Naranjo, H. N. — 1965. Evaluacion de los daňos causados por elDiatraea saccharalis Fabr. a la industria azucarera del valle geografico del Rio Cauca. Agronomia V de Caldas. —Fac. Agr. Manizales, Colombia,2, 1–56.
Negm, A. A. &Hensley, S. D. — 1967. The relationship of arthropod predators to crop damage inflicted by the sugarcane borer. —J. econ. Entomol.,60, 1503–1506.
Negm, A. A. &Hensley, S. D. — 1969. Evaluation of certain biological control agents of the sugarcane borer in Louisiana. —J. econ. Entomol.,62, 1008–1013.
Pschorn-Walcher, H. & Bennett, F. D — 1970. Host suitability experiments with three Tachinid parasites ofDiatraea spp. in Barbados and Trinidad, W. I. —ISSCT Proc. 13th Congress, 1331–1341.
Risco, S. H. — 1958. La utilización deParatheresia claripalpis W. para el control biológico deDiatraea saccharalis Fabr. con especial referencia a los resultados obtenidos en los Valles de Pativilca y Huaura. —Revta peru. Ent. agric.,1, 24–29.
— — 1960., La situation actual de los barrenadores de la cana de azúcar del geneèroDiatraea y otros taladradores en el Perú, Panamá y Ecuador. —Revta peru. Ent agric.,3, 6–10.
— — 1964. Los barrenodores del generoDiatarea y otros taladradores de la cana de azucar en Santa Cruz (Bolivia). —Revta. peru. Ent. agric.,7, 13–18.
Scaramuzza L.C. — 1945. Biological control of the sugar cane borer in Cuba by means of the flyLixophaga. —Revta peru. Ent. agric.,19, 11–16.
— — 1951. El control biologico y sus resultados en el lucha contra el barrenador a perforador de la cana,Diatraea saccharalis (Fabr.), en Cuba por medio de la mosca,Lixophaga diatraeae (Towns.). —Asambl. latinoamer. Fitoparasitologia,1, 282–292.
Simmonds, F. J. — 1955. Establishement of parasites ofDiatraea saccharalis F. in Dominica (British West Indies) and Guadeloupe (French West Indies). —Asambl. latiuoamer. Fitoparasitologia,32, 198–200.
— — 1960. The successful biological control of the sugar cane moth-borer,Diatraea saccharalis F. [Lepidoptera: Pyralidae], in Guadeloupe, F.W.I. —Proc. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol.,10, 914–919.
Van Whervin, L. W. — 1963. The biological control of the moth-borer, saccharalis (F.), with special reference toLixophaga diatraeae Tns. A preliminary report. —Bull. Dep. Sci. Agric., Barbados,35, 22 pp.
Van Whervin, L. W. — 1966. Ecology, biology and behaviour ofLixophaga diatraeae Tns. and reslts of attempts (1958–1963) to establish it in Barbados for the control of the moth borer,Diatraea saccharalis (F.). —Bull. Dep. Sci. Agric.,43, 38 pp.
Zenner, J., I., Janamillo C., T. & Carcia A., C. — 1965. Determination del parasitisma natural delDiatraea spp., en dos Ingenios del Valle Geografico del Rio Cauca. —U. Nal de Colombia, Fac. Agr., 100 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennett, F.D. Current status of biological control of the small moth borers of sugar caneDiatraea spp. [Lep. Pyraeididae]. Entomophaga 16, 111–124 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370694
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370694