Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of soil aggregate size on early shoot and root growth of maize (Zea mays L.)

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in plant growth arising from differences in aggregate size in the seedbed are normally atributed to limitations in nutrient or water supply during the early growth period. This study was initiated to determine if these were the only mechanisms by which aggregate size influences plant response.

Four different aggregate size fractions (less than 1.6 mm, 1.6 to 3.2 mm, 3.2 to 6.4 mm and 6.4 to 12.8 mm diameter) were sieved from a silt loam soil. Nutrients were added to the soil and maize was grown in the aggregates for eighteen days after seedling emergence. Soil matric potential was maintained between — 3 and −20 kPa.

Shoot dry weight declined by 18% as aggregate size increased from less than 1.6 mm to 1.6–3.2 mm. There was little further decline as aggregate size increased to 6.4–12.8 mm. Final leaf area showed a similar decline. The availability of nutrients or water were not limiting.

Total root length in the coarsest aggregate system was less than 60% of that in the finest system. Main axes of seminal and nodal roots were longer in the coarser aggregate systems, the length of primary laterals was not affected, and length of secondary laterals was lower in the coarser systems. A greater proportion of the roots penetrated the larger aggregates than the smaller aggregates; however, the larger aggregates offered greater resistance to penetration by a rigid micropenetrometer (150 μ diameter probe). Diameter of the main axes roots were greatest in the largest two aggregate fractions. it is speculated that a combination of increased endogenous ethylene in roots in the finest aggregate system due to entrapment by water and increased mechanical resistance in the coarsest aggregate system accounts for the observed effects on root norphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brewer R 1976 Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Soils. R E Kruger Publ. Co., Hungtinton, N.Y. 482 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth I S 1968 The effect of the size of soil aggregate on nutrient supply. J. Agric. Sci. 70, 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox E P 1927. A method of assigning numerical and percentage values to the degree of roundness of sand grains. J. Paleontology 1, 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmead O T and Shaw R H 1962 Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture content and meteorological conditions. Agron. J. 54, 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter A R and Hewitt J S 1978 The deflection of plant roots. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 23, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiès J C and Stengel P 1981 Densité texturale de sols naturels. I. Méthode de mesure. Agonomie 1, 651–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant C D, Kay B D, Groenevelt P H, Kidd G E and Thurtell G W 1985 Spectral analysis of micropenetrometer data to characterize soil structure. Can. J. Soil Sci 65, 789–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M B 1983 Regulation of root growth and morphology by ethylene and other externally applied growth substances.In Growth Regulators in Root Development. Eds. M B Jackson and A D Stead. pp 103–116. British Plant Growth Regulator Group, Monograph No. 10.

  • Jackson M B 1985 Ethylene and responses of plants to soil water-logging and submergence. Ann. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 36, 145–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain N K and Grawal J P 1970 Effect of clod size in the seedbed on development and yield of sugarcane. Soil Sci. Soc. Am 34, 795–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J B and Eck H V 1973 Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing corn and grain sorghum.In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Revised edition. Eds. L M Walsh and J D Beaton, 491 p. Soil Science Society of America Inc. Madison, Wisc., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre D S and Stirk G B 1953 A method for determination of apparent density of soil aggregates. Aust. J. Ag. Res. 5, 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier G, Stengel P and Fies J C 1973 Une méthode de mesure de la densité apparente de petits aggeomérats terreux. Application l’analyse des systémes de porosité du sol. Ann. Agron. 24, 533–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermueller A J and Mikkelsen D S 1974 Effects of water management and soil aggregation on the growth and nutrient uptake of rice. Agron. J. 66, 627–632.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell R S 1977 Plant root systems: their Function and Interaction with the Soil. McGraw-Hill Book Co. (UK) Ltd. London. 298 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statyer R S 1967 Plant-Water Relationships. Academic Press, New York, 366 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor G W and Cochran W G 1980 Statistical Methods. 7th ed. The Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai M A and Hanway J J 1968. Uptake of native potassium by plants from natural soil aggregates of different sizes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32, 546–549.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M S 1974 The effect of soil aggregate size on seedling emergence and early growth. E Afr. Agric. and For. J. 40, 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker P B 1976 Roots and water: Transport of water to plant roots in soil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. 273, 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R L, Sheard, R W and Moyer J R 1967 Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron. J. 59, 240–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donald, R.G., Kay, B.D. & Miller, M.H. The effect of soil aggregate size on early shoot and root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 103, 251–259 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370397

Key words

Navigation