Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present the results of a theoretical analysis of the intracranial fields produced by electrical stimulation of the unexposed motor cortex with surface electrodes in humans. Simulations of a first approximation model of the head indicate that the intensity and the spatial configuration of the intracranial fields can be controlled, to a great extent, by proper choice of the location and of the number of the stimulating electrodes. Fields are shown to be reasonably insensitive to changes of some crucial parameters, like the number of the stimulating electrodes and the ratio between the conductivity of the skull and that of the other tissues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, K.; Aimone-Marsan, C. Patterns of cortical discharges and their relation to routine scalp electroencephalography. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10:447–461; 1958.
Albers, B.A., Rutten, W.L.C.; Wallinga-de Jonge, W.; Boom, H.B.K. A model study on the influence of structure and membrane capacitance on volume conduction in skeletal muscle tissue. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 33:681–689; 1986.
Ary, J.P., Klein, S.A.; Fender, D.H. Location of source of evoked scalp potentials: corrections for skull and scalp thickness. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 28:447–452; 1981.
Barker, A.T.; Freeston, I.L.; Jalinous, R.; Jarratt, J.A. Motor responses to non-invasive brain stimulation in clinical practice. Electroencephalogr.. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:S70; 1985.
Boyd, S.G.; Rothwell, J.C.; Cowan, J.M.A.; Webb, P.J.; Morley, T.; Asselman, P.; Marsden, C.D. A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 49:251–257; 1986.
Brazier, M.A.B. A study of the electrical fields at the surface of the head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2:38–52; 1949.
Cohen, D.; Cuffin, B.N. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencefalograms and elettroencefalogram. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:38–51; 1983.
De Lucchi, M.R.; Garoutte B.; Aird, R.B. The scalp as an electroencephalographic averager. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 14:191–196; 1962.
Geisler, C.D. Average responses to clicks in man recorded by scalp electrodes. M.I.T. Technical Report, No. 380:1–158; 1960.
Geisler, C.D.; Gerstein, G.L. The surface EEG in relation to its sources. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 13:927–934; 1961.
Grandori, F. Potential fields evoked by the peripheral auditory pathway: inverse solutions. Int. J. Biomed. Comp. 13:517–528; 1982.
Grandori, F. Dipole localization methods (DLM) and auditory evoked brainstem potentials. Rev. Larying. Otol. Rhinol 105:171–178; 1984.
Grandori, F. Field analysis of auditory evoked brainstem potentials. Hearing Res. 21:51–58; 1986.
Grandori, F. Intracranial electric fields during transcranial brain stimulation. Modelling and simulations. In: Rossini, P.M.; Marsden, C.D. eds. Non-Invasive Stimulation of Brain and Spinal Cord: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications. New York: A.R. Liss; (in press).
Grandori, F. Modelling considerations for the stimulation of the motor cortex with transcranial electrodes. 7th Congr. of the Int Soc. of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, Enschede, June 20–23; 1988.
Jalinous, R.; Barker, A.T.; Freeston, I.L. The design, construction and performance of a magnetic nerve stimulator. Proc. of the IEE Int. Conf. on Electrical and Magnetic Fields in Medicine and Biology, Conf. Publ. Vol. No 257:59–63, London, IEE; 1985.
Kavanagh, R.N., Darcey, T.M.; Lehmann, D.; Fender, D.H. Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 25:421–429; 1978.
He, B.; Musha, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Homma, S.; Nakajima, Y., Sato, T. Electric dipole tracing in the brain by means of the boundary element method and its accuracy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34:406–414; 1987.
Henderson, C.J.; Butler, S.R.; Glass, A. The localization of equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electrical field theory. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39:117–130; 1975.
Heringa, A.; Stegeman, D.F.; Uijen, G.J.H.; de Weerd, J.P.C. Solution methods of electrical field problems in physiology IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 29:34–42; 1982.
Hosek, R.S.; Sances, A., Jr.; Jodat, R.W.; Larson, S.J. The contribution of intracerebral currents to the EEG and evoked potentials. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 25:405–413; 1978.
Levy, W.J.; York, D.H.; McCaffrey, M.; Tanzer, F. Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Neurosurgery 15:287–302; 1984.
Mejis, J.W.H.; Peters, M. The EEG and MEG, using a model of eccentric spheres to describe the head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 34:913–920; 1987.
Merton, P.A.; Morton, H.B. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact subject. Nature (Lond.) 285:227; 1980.
Merton, P.A.; Morton, H.B.; Hill, D.K.; Marsden, C.D. Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle. Lancet 11:597–600; 1982.
Mills, K.R.; Murray, N.M.F. Corticospinal tract conduction time in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 18:601–605; 1985.
Nicholson, P.W. Specific impedance of cerebral white matter. Exptl. Neurol. 13:386–401; 1965.
Pratt, H.; Har'El, Z.; Golos, E. Geometrical analysis of human three channel Lissajous' trajectory of auditory brainstem evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 58:83–88; 1984.
Rossini, P.; Di Stefano, E.; Stanzione, P. Nerve impulse propagation along central and peripheral fast conducting motor and sensory pathways in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60:320–334; 1985a.
Rossini, P.M.; Marciani, M.G.; Caramia, M.; Zarola, F. Nervous propagation along central motor pathways in intact man: characteristics of motor responses to “bifocal” and “unifocal” spine and scalp non-invasive stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:272–284; 1985b.
Rudy, Y.; Plonsey, R. The eccentric spheres model as the basis for a study on the role of geometry and inhomogeneities in the electrocardiography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 26:392–399; 1979.
Rush, S.; Driscoll, D.A. Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesthesia and Analgesia 47:717–723; 1968.
Rush, S.; Driscoll, D.A. EEG electrode sensitivity—An application of reciprocity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 16:15–22; 1969.
Scherg, M. Spatio-temporal modelling of early auditory evoked potentials. Rev. Laryng. Otol. Rhinol. 105:163–170; 1984.
Scherg, M.; von Cramon, D. A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I–V: results of a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62:290–299; 1985.
Schneider, M.R. A multistage process for computing virtual dipolar sources of EEG discharges from surface information. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 19:1–12; 1972.
Schneider, M. Effect of inhomogeneities on surface signals coming from a cerebral current-dipole source. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 21:52–54; 1974.
Sok, C.J. The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34:289–296; 1987.
Weinberg, H.; Brickett, P.; Coolsma, F.; Baff, M. Magnetic localisation of intracranial dipoles: simulation with a physical model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 64:159–170; 1986.
Witwer, J.G.; Trezek, G.J.; Jewett, D.L. The effect of media inhomogeneities upon intracranial electrical fields. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 19:352–362; 1972.
Wood, C.C. Application of dipole localization methods to source identification of human evoked potentials, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. vol. 388, pp. 139–155; 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grandori, F., Rossini, P. Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex: Theoretical considerations. Ann Biomed Eng 16, 639–652 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368019
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368019