Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pairs of electrocutaneous codes suitable for dual-channel sensory communication systems were compared using a dual-channel electrocutaneous tracking task. The tracking task required the test subject to dynamically respond to changes in the tactile sensation being modulated by two independent pseudorandom signals, one for each channel. The rule (or method) by which the signals changed the tactile sensations was called an electrocutaneous code. Four frequency variation codes and two intensity variation codes were paired in different combinations and then checked as to their effectiveness for sensory communications. The experimental protocol used a balanced incomplete block design which involved 24 subjects testing 3 of 8 code pairs each. Although the variance in the tracking performances between subjects was larger than the differences between the code pairs, learning rates for the various pairs were significantly different. The easiest one to learn was the Low Pulse Rate Modulation Code paired with itself. Other findings included the general superiority of monophasic stimulation code pairs over biphasic stimulation code pairs, the need for placement of the two electrodes on different dermatomes in order to achieve satisfactory dual-channel communications, and the greater sensitivity to electrocutaneous stimulation of the ventral side of the forearm versus its dorsal side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beeker, T.W., J. During, and A. den Hertog. Artificial touch in a hand prosthesis.Med. Biol. Eng. 5:47–49, 1967.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cochran, W.G. and G.M. Cox.Experimental Designs. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1950, pp. 259–273 and 315–345.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, C.C. Tactile television: Mechanical and electrical image projection.IEEE Trans. Man-Mach. Syst., MMS-11(2):85–91, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, C.C. and J. Madey. Tactile sensory replacement. Proceedings of the San Diego Biomedical Symposium 13:15–26, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, C.C., L.A. Scadden, and A.B. Alden. Mobility studies with a tactile imaging device. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Systems and Devices for the Disabled. Seattle, Washington, 1977.

  6. Kato, I., M. Kumamoto, S. Tamura, and Y. Tsunekawa. Human cognitional ability for electric stimulation signals. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on External Control of Human Extremities, edited by M.M. Gavrilovic and A.B. Wilson. Belgrade, Yugoslavia: ETAN, August 1970, pp. 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kato, I., S. Yamakarra, K. Ichikawa, and M. Sano. Multifunctional myoelectrical hand prosthesis with pressure sensory feedback system. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on External Control of Human Extremities, edited by M.M. Gavrilovic and A.B. Wilson. Belgrade, Yugoslavia: ETAN, August 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Melen, R.D. and J.D. Meindl. Electrocutaneous stimulation in a reading aid for the blind.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-18 (1):1–3, 1971.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfeiffer, E.A., C.M. Rhode, and S.T. Fabric. An experimental device to provide substitute tactile sensation from the anesthetic hand.Med. Biol. Eng. 7:191–199, 1969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prior, R.E., P.A. Case, and J. Lyman. Hook opening feedback for the below elbow amputee. Proceedings of the San Diego Biomedical Symposium 16:357–368, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prior, R.E. and J. Lyman. Electrocutaneous sensory feedback for artificial limbs: Single electrode encoding of grasp force and hand position from an externally energized hand. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on External Control of Human Extremities. Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia: ETAN, August 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rollman, G.B. Electrocutaneous stimulation: Psychometric functions and temporal integration.Percept. Psychophys. 5:289–293, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saunders, F.A. An electrotactile sound detector for the deaf.IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 21:285–287, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saunders, F.A. Recommended procedures for electrocutaneous displays. In:Functional Electrical Stimulation: Applications in Neural Prostheses, edited by F.T. Hambrecht and J.B. Reswick. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1977, pp. 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saunders, F.A., W.A. Hill, and C.A. Simpson. Speech perception via the tactile mode: Progress report. In:Sensory Aids for the Hearing Impaired, edited by H. Levitt, J.M. Pickett, and R.A. Houde. New York: IEEE Press, 1980, pp. 278–281.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmid, H.P. and G.A. Bekey. Tactile information processing by human operators in control systems.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., SMC-8(12):860–866, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidl, H. The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs.Prosthet. Orthot. Inter. 1:21–24, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott, R.N., R.H. Brittain, R.R. Caldwell, A.B. Cameron, and V.A. Dunfield. Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control.Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 18:65–69, 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Solomonow, M., A. Freedy, and J. Lyman. Frequency modulated cutaneous orientation feedback for artificial limbs. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Manual control, NASA-Ames, Moffett Field, California, 1975.

  20. Solomonow, M., J.S. Herskovitz, and J. Lyman. Learning in the tactile sense.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 7:127–134, 1979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Solomonow, M., J. Lyman, and A. Freedy. Electrotactile two-point discrimination as a function of frequency, body site, laterality, and stimulation codes.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 5:47–60, 1977.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sparks, D.W., P.K. Kuhl, A.E. Edmonds, and G.P. Gray. Investigating the MESA (Multipoint electrotactile speech aid): The transmission of segmental features of speech.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 66:246–257, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Szeto, A.Y.J. and J. Lyman. Comparison of codes for sensory feedback using electrocutaneous tracking.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 5(4):367–383, 1977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Szeto, A.Y.J., J. Lyman, and R.E. Prior. Electrocutaneous pulse rate and pulse width psychometric functions for sensory communications.Hum. Factors 21(2):241–249, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Szeto, A.Y.J., R.E. Prior, and J. Lyman. Electrocutaneous tracking: A methodology for evaluating sensory feedback codes.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-26(1):47–49, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Szeto, A.Y.J. and F.A. Saunders. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-29(4):300–308, 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tachi, S., K. Tanie, and M. Abe. Experiments on the magnitude sensations of electrocutaneous stimuli.Bull. Mech. Eng. Lab., Japan. No. 30, 1978, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tanie, K., S. Tachi, K. Komoriya, and M. Abe. Study of electrocutaneous parameters for application to dynamic tactual communication systems. In: Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering, edited by F. Denoth. Sorento, Italy, September 12–17, 1977, pp. 17–65 to 17–68.

  29. Walpole, R.E. and R.H. Myers.Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd Edition. New York: MacMillan Publishing, 1978, pp. 374–377.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. La Jolla Technology, Inc, 11558 Sorrento Valley Road, 92121, San Diego, California

    Andrew Y. J. Szeto

Authors
  1. Andrew Y. J. Szeto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant, ENG7908197 and completed in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szeto, A.Y.J. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems. Ann Biomed Eng 10, 175–192 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367389

Keywords

Search

Navigation