Skip to main content
Log in

The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of a single Node of Ranvier to short duration biphasic stimulating currents was studied. Such stimulus patterns are known to be less likely to induce tissue damage than are longer monophasic stimuli. The presence of the anodic phase of a pulse pair was found to abolish excitation in cases where the cathodic phase alone was near threshold. In addition, peak twitch force from the tibialis anterior muscle of cat was found to be reduced by the use of biphasic motor nerve stimulation in place of monophasic stimulation. The abolition phenomenon could be eliminated by the introduction of a delay of 100 μs between the phases of a biphasic stimulus waveform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brummer, S. B. and M. Turner. Electrochemical aspects of neuromuscular stimulation.Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation: Report of a Workshop. Washington, D. C., National Academy of Sciences, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crago, P. E., P. H. Peckham, J. T. Mortimer and J. P. Van Der Meulen. The choice of pulse duration for chronic electrical stimulation via surface, nerve, and intramuscular electrodes.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2:252–264, 1974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dodge, F. A. and B. Frankenhaeuser. Membrane currents in isolated frog nerve fiber under voltage clamp conditions.J. Physiol. 143:76–90, 1958.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frankenhaeuser, B. A method for recording resting and action potentials in the isolated myelinated nerve fiber of the frog.J. Physiol. 135:550–559, 1957.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankenhaeuser, B., and A. F. Huxley. The action potential in the myelinated nerve fiber ofXenopus Laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data.J. Physiol. 171:302–315, 1964.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frankenhaeuser, B., and A. Persson. Voltage clamp experiments on the myelinated nerve fibre.Acta Physiol. Scand. 41(Suppl. 145):45–46, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mortimer, J. T., D. Kaufman, and U. Roessmann. Tissue reaction to intramuscular electrical stimulation. Presented in Atlantic City, at 58th FASEB Meeting. Abstract inFed. Proc. 33(No. 3, Part 1):312, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pudenz, Robert H., L. A. Bullara, Denise Dru, and M. D. Talhalla. Electrical stimulation of the brain II. Effects on the blood-brain barrier.Surg. Neurol. 4:265–270, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tasaki, I. Initiation and abolition of the action potential of a single node of Ranvier.J. Gen. Physiol. 40:859–885, 1957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, Grant No. NINCDS NO1-NS-2-2314 (Neural Prosthesis Program) and GM 01090-15 Training Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Honert, C., Mortimer, J.T. The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents. Ann Biomed Eng 7, 117–125 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02363130

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02363130

Keywords

Navigation