In my opinion I think I failed completely, but I am quite happy with what I am trying to do. I just don't think I executed it well. So I was pretty unhappy with the whole experience in terms of the results, but I was not unhappy with the experience in terms of whether it was worth doing. I think it is important in science to develop free-thinking and being able to come to conclusions. Science is being able to reflect on the human condition, and being able to think about things you don't know about. (Miller)
Abstract
The education of prospective Elementary and Early Childhood (E&EC) teachers to teach science has been an on-going challenge for science teacher educators. Accordingly, a course in physical science was planned and implemented especially for prospective E&EC teachers. The purpose of this study was to understand the nature of the enacted curriculum and about the forces which constrained its evolution. Miller, the teacher of the course, had no prior experience in teaching prospective E&EC teachers and many of his experiences as a university level teacher were based on his teaching of physics majors. These experiences shaped his approach to teaching the course as did his years as a basketball coach. Miller was an expert in physics and constructed his role as teaching students significant scientific truths. Miller saw the purpose of the course as being to educate the students in science, not to prepare them to teach science. He was unwilling to address the goals of students that were oriented strongly toward becoming better teachers. The beliefs of the teacher constrained the enacted curriculum to an extent that gaps between the needs of students and the enacted curriculum were wider at the end of the course than they were at the beginning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrow, D. (1993).Restructuring college level physics for prospective elementary school teachers: A sociocultural analysis of the roles the instructor plays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
Berenson, S., Hodgin, K., Ward, C., Andrews, D., & Rudin, T. (1991). Needs assessment of elementary teachers in mathematics and science: A crucial step toward planning a Statewide inservice program.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(1), 16–22.
Brush, S. (1993).A case study of learning chemistry in a college physical science course developed for prospective elementary teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–161). MacMillan: New York.
Gardner, A. L., Cochran, K. F., & Tobin, K. (1993).Critical issues in reforming elementary teacher preparation in mathematics and science. Greeley, CO: University of Northern Colorado.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989).Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kahle, J., Anderson, A., & Damjanovic, A. (1991). A comparison of elementary teacher attitudes and skills in teaching science in Australia and the United States.Research in Science Education, 21, 208–216.
Manning, P., Esler, W., & Baird, J. (1982). What research says: How much elementary science is really being taught?Science and Children, 19(8), 40–41.
McRobbie, C. J., & Tobin, K. (1995). Restraints to reform: The congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 373–385.
Mechling, K., Stedman, C., & Donnellan, K. (1982). Preparing and certifying science teachers.Science and Children, 20(2), 9–14.
National Research Council. (1994).National science education standards (Draft). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (1983). Recommended standards for the preparation and certification of teachers of science at the elementary and middle/junior high school levels.Science and Children, 21(1), 65–70.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (in press). Aristotle and natural observation versus Galileo and scientific experiment: An analysis of lectures in physics for prospective elementary teachers in terms of discourse and inscriptions.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Shaw, K. (submitted). Integration or separation of mathematics and science? Problems in establishing the isomorphism of fundamental structure and mathematical form.International Journal of Science Education.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Hook, K. S. (1994). Referents for changing a science curriculum: A case study of one teacher's change in beliefs.Science & Education, 3(3), 245–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Armstrong College
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobin, K., Roth, WM. & Brush, S. Teaching physics to prospective elementary teachers: Bridging gaps or widening chasms. Research in Science Education 25, 267–281 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357401
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357401