Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Circular motion: Some post-instructional alternative frameworks

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference note

  1. ‘Junior Secondary’ section,The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 1983,29,(3), 67.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. DEAKIN, M. & TROUP, G. Centrifugal force: An elucidation.The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 1982,28(3), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. GARDNER, P.L. On centrifugal force.The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 1981,27,(3), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GARDNER, P.L. Centrifugal force: A reply to Deakin and Troup.The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 1982,28,(3), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. GUNSTONE, R. Circular motion: Some pre-instruction alternative frameworks.Research in Science Education, 1984,14, 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCLOSKEY, M., CARAMAZZA, A., & GREEN, G. Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects.Science, 1980,210, 1139–41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. VIENNOT, L. Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics.European Journal of Science Education, 1979,1, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  7. WARREN, J.W.Understanding force. London, John Murray, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. WATTS, D.M. A study of schoolchildren's alternative frameworks of the concept of force.European Journal of Science Education, 1983,5(2), 217–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Paul Gardner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardner, P. Circular motion: Some post-instructional alternative frameworks. Research in Science Education 14, 136–145 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356799

Keywords

Search

Navigation