Skip to main content
Log in

“Reading” scientific diagrams: Characterising components of skilled performance

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The interpretation of scientific diagrams has been characterised as a complex process. This contrasts sharply with an apparently widespread view among producers and users of resources for science teaching that they are generally unproblematic and that their meaning is usually quite transparent. The continued currency of this view is a matter of concern, especially when resources for learning in science are now so heavily based on pictorial presentation. It is likely that students who are new to scientific diagrams as a pictorial genre will look at them in a manner that is quite different from the way they are seen by their teachers. What seems to a teacher to be a straightforward and clearly presented depiction of a scientific concept, process or structure may be a mysterious and impenetrable abstraction to a student. Whereas the teacher is able to identify readily the elements of a diagram and link them into a coherent, meaningful whole, the student may misunderstand what it is that is depicted and how the depicted entitles are related. A critical factor underlying such differences appears to be the extent and nature of the mental representation of student and teacher. Both of these aspects of the mental representation of scientific diagrams would probably have to be addressed if there are to be improvements in the development of students' diagram interpretation skills. It does not seem sufficient merely to give students a huge diet of diagrams and assume that the necessary reading skills are either present or will develop by themselves. Rather, a deliberate programme designed to develop well structured mental representations of scientific diagrams should accompany efforts to build up an extensive knowledge base about this highly specialised form of visual display. Such a programme should be accompanied by instruction that develops appropriate processing strategies that allow students to gain maximum value from the diagrams they encounter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANTES, J.R., CHANG, K., LENZEN, T. & MULLIS, C. (1985) Eye movements in map reading. In R. Groner, G.W. McConkie & C. Menz (Eds.)Eye movements and human information processing. (pp. 357–373). North Holland, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHASE, W.G. (1986) Visual information processing. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman & J.P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2) (pp. 28.1–28.71). New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPER, L.A. (1980) Recent themes in visual information processing: A selected overview. In R.S.Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII (pp. 319–345). Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DWYER, F.M. (1967) The relative effectiveness of varied visual illustrations in complementing programmed instruction.The Journal of Experimental Education, 36, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, J.R. (1985, August)Map inspection during reading. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Psychological Societies, Christchurch, N.Z.

  • KOTOVSKY, K., HAYES, J.R. & SIMON, H.A. (1985) Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi.Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEVIE, W.H. & LENTZ, R. (1982) Effect of text illustrations: A review of research.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOWE, R.K. (in press) Search strategies and inference in the exploration of scientific diagrams.Educational Psychology.

  • LOWE, R.K. (1987) Mental representation and diagram interpretation.Australian Educational Researcher, 15, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARLAND, M. (1977)Language across the curriculum. London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWELL, A. & SIMON, H.A. (1972)Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHEPARD, R.N. & COOPER, L.A. (1982)Mental images and their transformations. Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SLESS, D. (1984) Visual literacy: A failed opportunity.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 4, 224–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • VACCA, R.T. (1981)Content Area Reading. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • WINN, W. (1982) The role of diagrammatic representation in learning sequences, identification and classification as a function of verbal and spatial ability.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • YARBUS, A.L. (1967)Eye movements and vision New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lowe, R. “Reading” scientific diagrams: Characterising components of skilled performance. Research in Science Education 18, 112–122 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356586

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356586

Keywords

Navigation