Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathways to aggression: A factorial survey of “Routine conflict”

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on data collected in 1994 from a factorial survey of 2052 respondents, this paper examines how routine conflict may escalate into aggression taking into account social context and characteristics of the victim and offender. Following Luckenbill and Doyle's (1989) suggestion, we developed a series of scenarios to examine the influence of structural position on the emergence of disputes and the legitimation of aggression. The analysis reveals a direct relationship between the intensity of an attack with the emergence of a dispute and the legitimation of aggression. Results indicate that situational aspects of structural position do not extend beyond sex differences. This emphasizes the generalizing effect of male on male confrontation in the legitimation of aggression. The strengths and limitations of scenario-based research for understanding violence in society are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball-Rokeach, S. (1973). Values and violence: A test of the subculture of violence thesis.Am. Sociol. Rev. 38: 736–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R., and Richardson, D. (1994).Human Aggression, 2nd ed., Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, T. (1990). Angry aggression among the “truly” disadvantaged.Criminology 28: 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.Psychol. Bull. 106: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkbeck, C., and LaFree, G. (1993). The situational analysis of crime and deviance.Annu. Rev. Sociol. 19: 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B., and Collins, J. (1985).Crime Victimization in the District of Columbia, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In: Eck, J. E., and Weisburd D. (eds.),Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 4, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felstiner, W., Abel, R., and Sarat, A. (1980–1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, and claiming.Law Soc. Rev. 15: 631–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974).Frame Analysis, Doubleday, Garden City, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff-Corzine, L., Corzine, J., and Moore, D. (1991). Deadly connections: Culture, poverty, and the direction of lethal violence.Social Forces 69: 715–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L. (1988). Going it alone: Unreported crime and individual self-help.J. Crim. Just. 16: 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L., and Forde, D. (1990). Risky lifestyles and dangerous results: Routine activities and exposure to crime.Sociol. Social Res. 74: 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbill, D. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction.Social Problems 25: 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbill, D., and Doyle, D. (1989). Structural position and violence: Developing a cultural explanation.Criminology 27: 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., and Danner, M. (1993). Offense seriousness scaling: An alternative to scenario methods.J. Quant. Criminol. 9: 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1995)Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. (1982). Societal development, social inequality and homicide: A cross-national test of a Durkheimian model.Social Forces 61: 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T., and Meier, R. (1994).Crime and Its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen, C., Corzine, J., and Huff-Corzine, L. (1994). The violent West reexamined: A research note on regional homicide rates.Criminology 32: 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D., and Pravatiner, M. (1989). Additional evidence that taverns enhance nearby crime.Sociol. Social Res. 73: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P., and Berk, R. (1982).Measuring Social Judgments, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, V., and Kennedy, L. (1996).The Criminal Event, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, L., Kumar, K., and Zahn, M. (1991). Quantifying Luckenbill.Deviant Behav 12: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research.J. Res. Crime Delinq 21: 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J., and Felson, R. (1994).Violence, Aggression, & Coercive Actions, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., and Herrnstein, R. (1985).Crime and Human Nature, Simon and Shuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillman, D. (1988). Cognition-excitation interdependencies in aggressive behavior.Aggress. Behav. 14: 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, L.W., Forde, D.R. Pathways to aggression: A factorial survey of “Routine conflict”. J Quant Criminol 12, 417–438 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354426

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354426

Key Words

Navigation