Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of criminological research and public policy

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine here some of the interactions of research and policy over the past several decades. The “rehabilitation period” was effectively terminated by nulleffect evaluations of various rehabilitation techniques. The “just deserts-utilitarian period” was fed by research estimates of the deterrent and incapacitative effects of criminal justice activities. The more recent “overt politicization period” saw the earlier attempt to bring rational and theory-based perspectives to policy development replaced by much stronger emphasis on political concerns. We explore possible ways to reestablish the research-policy connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avi-Itzhak, B., and Shinnar, R. (1973). Quantitative models in crime control.J. Crim. Just. 1(3): 185–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1967). Crime and punishment: An economic approach.J. Polit. Econ. 78(2): 526–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1995). Youth violence, guns and the illicit-drug industry.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86(1): 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., and Cohen, J. (1979). Estimation of individual crime rates from arrest records.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 70: 561–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. (1978).Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating-the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, Report of the Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitative Effects, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Miller, H. D. (1980). Demographically disaggregated projections of prison populations.J. Crim. Just. 8: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, J. M., and Chaiken, M. R. (1982).Varieties of Criminal Behavior, Rand Report R-2814-NIJ. Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. (1975). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death.Am. Econ. Rev. 65(3): 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empey, L. T., and Rabow, J. (1961). Experiment in delinquency rehabilitation.Am. Sociol. Rev. 26: 679–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1965). Correctional research: An elusive paradise.J. Res. Crime Delina. 2: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D., Wilkins, L., and Hoffman, P. (1978).Guidelines for Parole and Sentencing, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W., Rydell, C. P., Abrahamse, A. F., Caulkins, J. P., Chiesa, J., Model, K. E., and Klein, S. P. (1994).Three Strikes and You're Out: Estimated Benefits and Costs of California's New Mandatory-Sentencing Law, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W., Model, K. E., Rydell, C. P., and Chiesa, J. (1996).Diverting Children from a Life of Crime: Measuring Costs and Benefits, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, K. (1982). Impact of the Minnesota sentencing guidelines on sentencing practices.Hamline Law Rev. 5: 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, K., Tift, R., Popplewell, F., Richardson, B., and Broucek, J. (1979).Development of Statewide Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota: Data Collection Instruments, Minesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D., Martinson, R., and Wilks, J. (1975).The Effectiveness of Correctional, Treatment: A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform.Public Interest 10: 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. (1974).The Future of Imprisonment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967).The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, J.O., and Smith, G. (1971). The effectiveness of correctional programs.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 17: 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, C. P., and Everingham, S. S. (1994).Controlling Cocaine: Supply Versus Demand Programs, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L., White, S., and Brown, E. (1979).The Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders: Problems and Prospects, Report of the Panel on Rehabilitative Techniques, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hirsch, A. (1976).Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments, Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. Q., Palmer, T. B., Neto, V. V., and Turner, J. K. (1966).Community Treatment Project: An Evaluation of Community Treatment for Delinquents, Fifth Progress Report, CIP Research Report No. 7, California Youth Authority, Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, L. T., Kress, J., Gottfredson, D. M., Calpin, J. C., and Gelman, A. M. (1978).Sentencing Guidelines: Structuring Judicial Discretion—Report on the Feasibility Study, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1975). Lock'em up and other thoughts on crime.N. Y. Times Mag. Mar. 9.

  • Zedlewski, E. W. (1987).Making Confinement Decisions, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was prepared for the Plenary Session,Journal of Quantitative Criminology 10-Year Anniversary, 1995 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Boston, MA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blumstein, A. Interaction of criminological research and public policy. J Quant Criminol 12, 349–361 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354423

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354423

Key Words

Navigation