Skip to main content
Log in

Grant monitoring by charities: The process of grant-making and evaluation

  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the results of a survey of grant monitoring in 170 UK charities. The monitoring and evaluation process is modelled and the extent to which donors follow this is explored. Although over 70 per cent of donors monitored grants, a much smaller percentage proceeded to evaluate results. Reasons for this and an indication of how the processes are carried out are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accounting Standards Committee (1975)The Corporate Report, Accounting Standards Committee, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, J.K. (1984) Accounting information and non-profit organisations, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (1988)Evaluation in the Voluntary Sector, The Forbhes Trust, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, P. and Morgan-Jones, P. (1981)Accounting by Charities, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, E.A. (1993) Voluntary agencies as development organisations: theorising the problem of efficiency and accountability,Development and Change, 24, 269–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, H. and Palmer, B. (1986)Value for Money in the Public Sector, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charities Aid Foundation (1993)Directory of Grant Making Trusts, Charities Aid Foundation, Tonbridge and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charitable Trusts' Administrators Group (1984)Monitoring and Evaluation for Grant-Givers. Report of a workshop organised jointly by the CTAG and the HOVSU, Home Office Voluntary Service Unit, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudbury, N. (1988) The seeking of accounting where it is not: towards a theory of non-accounting in organisation settings.Accounting, Organisations and Society, 13, 6, 549–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feek, W. (1988)Working Effectively: A Guide to Evaluation Techniques, Bedford Square Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling, T., Jones, R. and Karim, R.A. (1993) Credible organisations: selfregulation v. external standard setting in Islamic banks and British charities,Financial Accountability and Management, August, 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, R. & Rochester, C. (1993)Good Grant Making. A Practical Guide, Association of Charitable Foundations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1989)Efficiency Scrutiny of the Voluntary Sector, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, N. (1990) Charity accounting: an empirical study of the information needs of contributors to UK fund raising charities,Financial Accountability and Management in Governments, Public Services and Charities, 6, 4, Winter, 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (1989) Evaluation for voluntary organisations,Community Development Journal,24, October, 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D. (1988)Voluntary Organisations and Accountability, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D. (1992a)Trusts in Transition: The Policy and Practice of Grant-Giving Trusts, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D. (1992b)Grant Giving: A Guide to Policy Making, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J.B. (1981) Process accountability and the creative use of intergovernmental resources,Public Administration Review, Special Issue, 41, 144–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, N. (1991) Grant monitoring by charities, unpublished BA Honours disertation, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M. (1987)The Corporate Donors' Handbook: A Guide to Good Practice in Company Charitable Giving, Directory of Social Change, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the NCVO/Charity Commission Working Party on Trustee Training (1992)On Trust: Increasing the Effectiveness of Charity Trustees and Management Committees, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

  • Skousen, K.F., Smith, J.M. and Woodfield, L.W. (1975)User Needs: An Empirical Study of College and University Financial Reporting, National Association of College and University Business Officers, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E. (1992) Evaluating innovatory programmes: an external evaluator's views, in J. Batsleer, C. Cornforth and R. Paton (eds)Issues in Voluntary and Non-profit Management, Addison Wesley, Wokingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J.D. (1984) Information in public accountability, in A.G. Hopwood and C. Tompkins (eds)Issues in Public Sector Accounting, Philip Allan, Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (1989) Evaluation in the voluntary sector,Community development Journal, 24 October, 301–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. and Webb, A. (1992a)A New Approach to Public Sector Grantmaking, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. and Webb, A. (1992b)Outcome Funding: A new approach to Public sector Grantmaking, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashford, K., Clarke, J. Grant monitoring by charities: The process of grant-making and evaluation. Voluntas 7, 279–299 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354119

Keywords

Navigation