Skip to main content
Log in

A call for greater attention to the role of employers in developing, transforming, and implementing family policies

  • Invited Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors contend that employer-initiated workplace policies should be considered as part of the patchwork that constitutes U.S. family policy. To provide a background, historical evidence of employer-initiated policies intentionally used as family policies is summarized. The view is then explicated that failure to take economic conditions and workplace policies into account may lead to faulty conclusions about the reasons for major changes in family life. The current status of selected employer-initiated workplace policies and recent trends is summarized. Next, some of the dilemmas inherent in considering connections between government- and employer-initiated policies are identified. Finally, suggestions for future directions are offered. The article should be considered with the following caveat in mind: the focus is exclusively on the influence of policies on families, but families are not merely reactive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldous, J., Dumon, W., with Johnson, K. (Eds.) (1980).The politics and programs of family policy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame and Leuven University Press, Center for the Study of Man.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. A. (1991). The future of family policy: A postscript. In E. A. Anderson & R. C. Hula (Eds.),The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 237–240). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. A., & Hula, R. C., (Eds.). (1991).The reconstruction of family policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. M. (1991).Between feminism and labor: The significance of the comparable worth movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Hamilton, J., & Medoff, J. (1990).Employers large and small. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J., Ed. (1988).The changing American family and public policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, R., D'Onofrio, C., Kurdas, C., Michl, T. R., Moseley, F., & Naples, M. I. (Eds.). (1987).The imperiled economy (Book 1). New York: Union for Radical Political Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, P. A. (1993). The sky is falling but Popenoe's analysis won't help us do anything about it.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 548–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1986).Prisoners of the American dream: Politics and economy in the history of the working class. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bie, P. J. L. (1980). The rationale and social context of family policy in Western Europe. In J. Aldous, W. Dumon, & K. Johnson (Eds.),The politics and programs of family policy (pp. 3–38). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame and Leuven University Press, Center for the Study of Man.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, I. K. (Ed.). (1983).Families, politics, and public policy: A feminist dialogue on women and the state. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, S. M., & Strober, M. H. (1988).Feminism, children and the new families. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. A., & O'Farrell, B., with Allen, L. (1991).Work and family: Policies for a changing workforce. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1983). Contemporary American families: Decline or transformation? In I. K. Diamond (Ed.),Families, politics and public policy: A feminist dialogue on women and the state (pp. 21–40). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984).What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., & Friedman, D. E. (1994).Highlights: The national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Googins, B. K. (1991).Work-family conflicts: Private lives—public responses. New York: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. R. (1980).The world of the worker: Labor in twentieth century America. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989).The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry in the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W. (1989). Effects of maternal employment in the two-parent family.American Psychologist, 44, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1992).The dispossessed: America's underclasses from the Civil War to the present. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. B., & Kingston, P. W. (1982). Employer responses to the family responsibilities of employees. In S. B. Kamerman & C. D. Hayes (Eds.),Families that work: Children in a changing world (pp. 144–208). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977).Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (1976). Women, work, and the social order. In B. A. Carroll (Ed.),Liberating women's history: Theoretical and critical essays (pp. 330–343). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (1982).Out to work: A history of wage-earning women in the United States. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, P. W. (1990). Illusions and ignorance about the family-responsive workplace.Journal of Family Issues, 11, 438–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. J. (1993). Workplace policies as social policy.Social Service Review, June, 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDermid, S. M. (1991, April).Changing families, changing workplaces. Paper presented at YWCA Spring Lecture Series, Lafayette, IN.

  • MacDermid, S. M., Williams, M., Marks, S., & Heilbrun, G. (1994). Is small beautiful? Work-family tension, work conditions, and organizational size.Family Relations, 43, 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. M. (1992). Family influences on work. In S. J. Bahr (Ed.),Family research: A sixty year review, 1930–1960. Vol 2. (pp. 115–166). New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. (1987). The historical problem of the family wage: The Ford Motor Company and the five dollar day. In N. Gerstel and H. E. Gross (Eds.),Families and work (pp. 111–131). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menaghan, E. G., & Parcel, T. L. (1990). Parental employment and family life: Research in the 1980's.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1079–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S., III (1981).The five dollar day: Labor management and social control in the Ford Motor Company, 1908–1921. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, L., & Frankel, D. M. (1991).The state of working America. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Schorr, A. L. (1987). Families and social policy. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.),Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 795–813). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hare, W. P. (1985). Poverty in America: Trends and new patterns.Population Bulletin, 40(3), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, T., & Preister, S., (Eds.). (1988).A strategy for strengthening families: Using family criteria in policymaking and program evaluation. Washington, DC: Family Impact Seminar, AAMFT Research and Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1970).The female labor force in he United States: Demographic and economic factors governing its growth and changing composition. (Population Monograph Series, 5). Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, C. C., Perrucci, R., Targ, D. B., & Targ, H. R. (1988).Plant closings: International context and social costs. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrkowski, C. S., Rapoport, R. N., & Rapoport, R. (1987). Families and work. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.),Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 251–283). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1993a). American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1993b). The national family wars.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 553–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1989). Can we make time for children? The economy, work schedules, and child care.Demography, 26, 523–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, P. H. (1990). The organizational effects of workplace family policies: Past weaknesses and recent progress toward improved research.Journal of Family Issues, 11, 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. M., & Riney, B. J. (1994).Working wives and dual-earner families. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, L. (1980).To work and to wed: Female employment, feminism, and the Great Depression. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E. E. (1994, June 17). Advantages of employer health plans are disappearing.The Wall Street Journal, pp. C1, C15.

  • Schwarz, J. E., & Volgy, T. J. (1992).The forgotten Americans. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service Employees International Union. (1989, July).Employer-paid health insurance is disappearing: A survey of benefit takeaways in contract bargaining. Service Employees International Union, Department of Public Policy.

  • Shaikh, A. (1987). The falling rate of profit and the economic crisis in the U.S. In R. Cherry, C. D'Onofrio, C. Kurdas, T. R. Michl, F. Moseley, & M. I. Naples (Eds.),The imperiled economy (Book 1, pp. 115–126). New York: Union for Radical Political Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, U. (1937).The flivver king: A story of Ford-America. Chicago: C. H. Kerr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spakes, P. (1991). A feminist approach to national family policy. In E. A. Anderson & R. C. Hula (Eds.),The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 23–42). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R., & Hartmann, H., with Clearwaters, D. (1992). Raising women's earnings: The family issue of the 1990's. In J. Greenberg & W. Kistler, (Eds.),Buying America back (pp. 384–395). Tulsa, OK: Council Oak Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1990).Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1993). Good riddance to “the family”: A response to David Popenoe.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 545–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrels, M. E. (1992). The evolution of workplace family policy research.Journal of Family Issues, 13, 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, M. H. (1988). Two-earner families. In S. M. Dornbusch & M. H. Strober (Eds.),Feminism, children and the new families (pp. 161–190). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, M. H., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1988). Public policy alternatives. In S. M. Dornbusch & M. H. Strober (Eds.),Feminism, children and the new families (pp. 327–355). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Targ, D. B. (1981). Ideology and utopia in family studies since the Second World War.Women's Studies International Quarterly, 4, 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Targ, D. B., & Perrucci, C. C. (1990). Plant closings, unemployment and families. In R. S. Hanks & M. B. Sussman (Eds.),Corporations, businesses and families (pp. 131–145). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzcinski, E. (1994). Family and medical leave, contingent employment, and flexibility: A feminist critique of the U.S. approach to work and family policy.Social Policy and Social Work Practice, 18, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzcinski, E., & Finn-Stevenson, M. (1991). A response to arguments against mandated parental leave: Findings from the Connecticut survey of parental leave policies.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1975).Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Bicentennial Edition (Part 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Statistical abstract of the United States (112th Edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993a). Poverty in the United States: 1992. (Current Population Report, Series P-60, No. 185). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993b).Statistical abstract of the United States (113th Edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congressional Budget Office. (1993).Displaced workers: Trends in the 1980's and implications for the future. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Small Business Administration. (1990).The state of small business: A report to the president. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, J. R. (1991). The decline in men's labor force participation and income and the changing structure of family economic support.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1994, May 29). Childless workers demanding equity in corporate world.New York Times, pp. 1, 11.

  • Winnick, A. J. (1988). The changing distribution of income and wealth in the United States, 1960–1985: An examination of the movement toward two societies, “separate and unequal”. In P. Voydanoff & L. C. Majka (Eds.),Families and economic distress: Coping strategies and social policy (pp. 232–260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, S. L. (1992).Family policies and family well-being: The role of political culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

She received her Ph.D. and M.B.A. from The Pennsylvania State University. Her research interests center on relationships between jobs and family life, with emphasis on work-family relationships in small businesses, and on adult workers as developing individuals.

Her research interests focus on the intersection of social problems and family problems, including families and work, coping with unemployment, and adult children as caregivers of dependent parents. She received her Ph.D. from Purdue University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDermid, S.M., Targ, D.B. A call for greater attention to the role of employers in developing, transforming, and implementing family policies. J Fam Econ Iss 16, 145–170 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353670

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353670

Key Words

Navigation