Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian individualization via sampling-based methods

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the situation where we wish to adjust the dosage regimen of a patient based on (in general) sparse concentration measurements taken on-line. A Bayesian decision theory approach is taken which requires, the specification of an appropriate prior distribution and loss function. A simple method for obtaining samples from the posterior distribution of the pharmacokinetic parameters of the patient is described. In general, these samples are used to obtain a Monte Carlo estimate of the expected loss which is then minimized with respect to the dosage regimen. Some special cases which yield analytic solutions are described. When the prior distribution is based on a population analysis then a method of accounting for the uncertainty in the population parameters is described. Two simulation studies showing how the methods work in practice are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. B. Sheiner, B. Rosenberg, and K. L. Melmon. Modeling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage.Comput. Biomed. Res. 5:441–459 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Vozeh and J. J. Steimer. Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimization: concepts, classifications and clinical application.Clin. Pharmacokin. 10:468–480 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Gaillot, J. J. Steimer, A. Mallet, J. J. Thebault, and A. Beider. A priori lithium dosage regimen using population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:579–628 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. W. Kelman, B. Whiting, and S. M. Bryson. OPT: a package of computer programs for parameter optimization in clinical pharmacokinetics.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 14:247–256 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Bayesian individualization of pharmacokinetics: simple implementation and comparison with non-Bayesian methods.J. Pharm. Sci. 71:1344–1348 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O. Richter and D. Reinhardt. Methods for evaluating optimal dosage regimens and their application to theophylline.Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 20:564–575 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Katz and D. Z. D'Argenio. Implementation and evaluation of control strategies for individualizing dosage regimens, with application to the aminoglycoside antibiotics.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 14:523–537 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Z. D'Argenio and D. Katz. Application of stochastic control methods to the problem of individualizing intravenous theophylline therapy.Biomed. Meas. Inform. Contr. 3:115–122 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Hu, W. S. Lovejoy, and S. L. Shafer. An efficient control strategy for dosage regimens.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 22:73–94 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Wakefield. An expected loss approach to the design of dosage regimens via sampling-based methods.Statistician 43:13–29 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. F. M. Smith and A. E. Gelfand. Bayesian statistics without tears: a sampling resampling perspective.Am. Statist. 46:84–88 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. D. Ripley.Stochastic Simulation, Wiley, New York, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Mallet. A maximum likelihood estimation method for random coefficient regression models.Biometrika 73:645–656 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Davidian and A. R. Gallant. Smooth nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for population pharmacokinetics, with application to quinidine.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 20:529–556 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. C. Wakefield, A. F. M. Smith, A. Racine-Poon, and A. E. Gelfand. Bayesian analysis of linear and nonlinear population models using the Gibbs sampler.Appl. Statist. 43:201–221 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. E. Bennett and J. C. Wakefield. Comparison of population software using the monoexponential model.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. (submitted).

  17. N. G. Best, K. K. C. Tan, W. R. Gilks, and D. J. Spiegelhalter. Estimation of population pharmacokinetics using the Gibbs sampler.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. (in press).

  18. J. C. Wakefield. The Bayesian analysis of population pharmacokinetic models.J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 91:306–319 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wakefield, J. Bayesian individualization via sampling-based methods. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 24, 103–131 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353512

Key Words

Navigation