Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of auditory discrimination in children with ADD and without ADD

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Auditory discrimination abilities of children with and without attention deficits were investigated to measure the variability due to different response modes (verbal [NU-6] and picture pointing [GFW]) and competing messages (GFW). Results showed no differences between response modes in quiet, but significant differences in noise between groups with children having ADD showing poorer speech discrimination. Additionally, differential effects between types of competing messages for the same task were not found in the ADD group. These results are discussed in relation to the clinical use of these tests, the relationships seen between results, and implications for educational management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalebout SD, Nelson NW, Hletko PJ: Selective auditory attention and children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of repeated measurement with and without methylphenidate.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 22: 219–227, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gascon G, Johnson R Burd L: Central auditory processing and attention deficit disorders.J Child Neuro 1: 27–33, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geffner D Lucker J: Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in attention deficit disordered children.ADVANCE for Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists 4 (1): 5 +, 42, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keith R W Rudy J Donahue P A Katbamna B: Comparison of SCAN results with other auditory and language measures in a clinical population.Ear and Hearing 10 (6): 382–386, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keith R W Engineer P: Effects of methylphenidate on the auditory processing abilities of children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder.J Learning Dis 24 (10): 630–636, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Love A J Thompson M G G: Language disorders and attention deficit disorders in young children referred for psychiatric services: Analysis of prevalence and a conceptual synthesis.Am J Orthopsychiat 58: 52–64, 1988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moss W L Sheiffele W A: Can we differentially diagnose an attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity from a central auditory processing problem?Child Psychiat Hum Developm 24: 85–96, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearson D A Lane D M Swanson J M: Auditory attention switching in hyperactive children.J Abnorm Child Psychol 19 (4): 479–492, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zentall S Shaw J: Effects of classroom noise of performance and activity of secondgrade hyperactive and control children.J Ed Psychol 72 (6): 830–840, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Psychiatric Association:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd Ed.), DSM-III Revised, Washington, D.C., 1987.

  11. Goldman R, Fristoe M, Woodcock R:Auditory Selective Attention Test. Minnesota: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Winter R: Improving attention abilities in a learning disabled child through the use of an F.M. auditory trainer. Unpublished Master's Research Project, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Parent and Child Consultation Service

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geffner, D., Lucker, J.R. & Koch, W. Evaluation of auditory discrimination in children with ADD and without ADD. Child Psych Hum Dev 26, 169–180 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353358

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353358

Key Words

Navigation