Skip to main content
Log in

Incentives and accessibility: A pilot study to promote adherence to TB prophylaxis in a high-risk community

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Setting

A community-based directly observed preventive therapy (DOPT) program for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection among injection drug users (IDUs) in an innercity neighborhood.

Objective

To test adherence to a 6-month course of DOPT using cash incentives and an easily accessible neighborhood location.

Design

Street-recruited IDUs (N=205) were screened forMycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection using the Mantoux test and two controls. Subjects who had a purified protein derivative (PPD) reaction of ≥5 mm, were anergic, or had a history of a positive PPD received clinical evaluation at a community field site, provided in collaboration with the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Clinic. Twenty-eight subjects were considered appropriate candidates for prophylaxis with isoniazid, and 27 enrolled in the pilot study. Participants received twice-weekly DOPT at a community satellite office, with a $10 cash incentive at each visit.

Results

The 6-month (26-week) regimen was completed by 24/27 (89%) participants. The median time to treatment completion was 27 weeks (range 26 to 34 weeks). The median proportion of dosing days attended in 6 months was 96%.

Conclusion

Community-based DOPT using cash incentives resulted in high levels of adherence and treatment completion among drug users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of tuberculosis in US communities with at-risk minorities; and among homeless persons: recommendations of the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis.Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;41(RR5):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The use of preventive therapy for tuberculosis infection in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee for the Elimination of Tuberculosis.Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1990;39(RR-8):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gourevitch MN, Alcabes P, Wasserman WC, Arno PS. Cost-effectiveness of directly observed chemoprophylaxis of tuberculosis among drug users at high risk for tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2(7):531–540.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daly CL, Hahn HA, Moss AR, Hopewell PC, Schecter GF. Incidence of tuberculosis in injection drug users in San Francisco: impact of anergy.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder DC, Paz EA, Mohle-Boetani J, Black R, Fallstad R, Chin DP. Tuberculosis prevention in methadone maintenance clinics: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:178–185.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smirnoff M, Goldberg R, Indyk L, Adler JJ. Directly observed therapy in an inner city hospital.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2(2):134–139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giuffrida A, Torgerson D. Should we pay the patient? Review of financial incentives to enhance patient compliance.BMJ. 1997;315:703–707.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Volmink J, Garner P. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of strategies to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment.BMJ. 1997;315:1403–1406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malotte CK, Rhodes F, Mais K. Tuberculosis screening and compliance with return for skin test reading among active drug users.Am J Public Health. 1998;88:792–796.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pilote L, Tulsky J, Zolopa A, Hahn J, Schecter G, Moss A. Tuberculosis prophylaxis in the homeless: a trial to improve adherence to referral.Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:161–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Malotte CK, Hollingshead JR, Rhodes F. Monetary versus nonmonetary incentives for TB skin test reading among drug users.Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(3):182–188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watters JK. Trends in risk behavior and HIV seroprevalence among injecting drug users in San Francisco, 1986–1992.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994;7:1276–1281.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations.Soc Problems. 1989;36:416–430.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lifson AR, Grant SM, Lorvick J, et al. Two-step tuberculin skin testing of injection drug users recruited from community-based settings.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997;1:128–134.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lifson AR, Thompson S, Grant S, Hilk R, Lorvick J. Skin test anergy among injection drug users recruited from community settings.J Drug Issues. 1998;28(4):891–904.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control. Purified protein derivative (PPD)-tuberculin anergy and HIV infection: guidelines for anergy testing and management of anergic persons at risk of tuberculosis.Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1991;40(RR-5):27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fitzgerald JM, Patrick DM, Strathdee S, et al. Use of incentives to increase compliance for TB screening in a population of intravenous drug users. Vancouver Injection Drug Use Study Group.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3:153–155.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farmer P, Robin S, Ramilus S, Kim JY. Tuberculosis, poverty, and “compliance”: lessons from rural Haiti.Semin Respir Infect. 1991;6(4):254–260.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaulk CP, Moore-Rice K, Rizzo R, Chaisson RE. Eleven years of community-based directly observed therapy for tuberculosis.JAMA. 1995;274:945–951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nazar-Stewart V, Nolan CM. Results of a directly observed intermittent isoniazid preventive therapy program in a shelter for homeless men.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992; 146:57–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alcabes P, Vossenas P, Cohen R, et al. Compliance with isoniazid in jail.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:1194–1197.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moriskey DE, Malotte CK, Choi P, et al. A patient education program to improve adherence rates with antituberculosis drug regimens.Health Ed Q. 1990;17(3):253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaisson RE, Keruly JC, McAvinue S, Gallant JE, Moore RD. Effects of an incentive and education program on return rates for PPD test reading in patients with HIV infection.J Acquir Immune Dis Syndr. 1996;11:455–459.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mangura BT, Passannante L, Reichman B. An incentive in tuberculosis preventive therapy for an inner city population.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997;1:576–578.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schecter G. Supervised therapy in San Francisco.Clin Chest Med. 1997;18(1):165–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Sadr W, Medard F, Barthaud V. Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis: the Harlem Hospital experience, 1993.Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1146–1148.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Lorvick BA.

Additional information

the late Dr. Watters was with the Urban Health Study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorvick, J., Thompson, S., Edlin, B.R. et al. Incentives and accessibility: A pilot study to promote adherence to TB prophylaxis in a high-risk community. J Urban Health 76, 461–467 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351503

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351503

Key Words

Navigation